[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] [AutoScheduler] Do we have plan to support auto schedule ExternOp?

2021-06-30 Thread Zhuwenxi via Apache TVM Discuss
Thank you, @comaniac . @jroesch @mbrookhart @ritwikdas54 I noticed you've participated in implementing those ops above (by git blame :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:), could you explain a little bit about why use TIR instead of TE? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/autosc

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] Add Project API RFC (#8)

2021-06-30 Thread Andrew Reusch
@mdw-octoml would be great to get your feedback here as well -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/8#issuecomment-871810453

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Meta Schedule (AutoTIR) (#5)

2021-06-30 Thread Junru Shao
Updated according to the comments. Would you guys like to re-review? @tqchen -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/5#issuecomment-871760591

[apache/tvm-rfcs] Add Project API RFC (#8)

2021-06-30 Thread Andrew Reusch
This PR adds an RFC for the Project API ([embryonic discussion](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/tvm-simplifying-the-compiler-interface/8703) - [m2 roadmap item #6](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/tvm-microtvm-m2-roadmap/8821)`). Project API is a plugin-style infrastructure that allows TVM to

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Meta Schedule (AutoTIR) (#5)

2021-06-30 Thread Junru Shao
Sorry for the delay! I am getting back on this RFC and will be working on it in the rest of this week -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/5#issuecomment-871602430

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] [AutoScheduler] Do we have plan to support auto schedule ExternOp?

2021-06-30 Thread Cody H. Yu via Apache TVM Discuss
It's possible that those ops need a finer control to buffers and it is hard to achieve in TE, but I didn't write those ops so I don't know the exact reason. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/autoscheduler-do-we-have-plan-to-support-auto-schedule-externop/10346/5) to respo

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC][TFLite frontend] Create models for frontend testing by directly writing TFLite buffers

2021-06-30 Thread Elen Kalda via Apache TVM Discuss
There's the PR - https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/8368 --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tflite-frontend-create-models-for-frontend-testing-by-directly-writing-tflite-buffers/9811/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsub

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] [AutoScheduler] Do we have plan to support auto schedule ExternOp?

2021-06-30 Thread Zhuwenxi via Apache TVM Discuss
@comaniac By the way, do you know the specific reason why ops like "scatter" choose to implement use TIR instead of TE? According to my quick statistic, there are at least 13 ops in relay uses TIR as their implementation: 1. argwhere 2. non_max_suppression 3. scanop 4. scatter 5. scatter_nd