cc @MJKlaiber
@Mousius thanks for splitting this off into another RFC. I agree implementing a
low-overhead embedded interface is super important. A couple thoughts:
At a high level, it would be great to explicitly spell out the entire interface
we expect to implement here. I think it might b
Not yet actually... still waiting for a response.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/build-failure-in-jvmpkg/9897/3)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/ema
Thanks @zackcquic . I also did a pass over the draft PR and I think the overall
proposal looks great. It would be good to think a bit about API naming and
naming convention in related previous designs.
e.g. how can we choose the argument name to the PassContext constructor
---
[Visit
Top
