[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] 'Cascade' Scheduling

2020-10-11 Thread Matt Barrett via Apache TVM Discuss
The limitation is perhaps more with TE/TIR than it is TOPI, in that currently *all* the scheduling decisions need to happen together. The proposed changes with TensorIR would lift that constraint, but for it to actually be useful the FuseOps pass would have to become a TIR pass rather than a R

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] 'Cascade' Scheduling

2020-10-11 Thread Cody H. Yu via Apache TVM Discuss
>From your response to TQ I feel that the current limitation is mainly from the >TOPI implementation, which fixed the granularity of conv2d schedule. This >limitation, however, can potentially be resolved by auto-scheduler (Ansor). In >fact, we AWS is attempting to use Ansor to perform more a

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [DISCUSS] TVM v0.8 Roadmap

2020-10-11 Thread Cody H. Yu via Apache TVM Discuss
For the pending PRs, we could have TensorRT and Xilinx Vitis-AI as v0.8 experimental features. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/discuss-tvm-v0-8-roadmap/8139/2) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Move to use main as default branch (#6623)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #6623. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6623#event-3864047760

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Move to use main as default branch (#6623)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
All the open PR's base has been updated to main -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6623#issuecomment-706761694

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [DISCUSS] TVM v0.8 Roadmap

2020-10-11 Thread tqchen via Apache TVM Discuss
Thanks for everyone’s effort we have successfully released v0.7. As per Apache way of development, we want broader involvement and inputs from community developers on what we want to push for in the v0.8 release cycle. This is a discussion thread to get everyone's thoughts about directions we

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] v0.7 Release Planning (#6421)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #6421. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6421#event-3863971512

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.7.0.rc0 (#6638)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #6638. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6638#event-3863970916

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] TVM v0.7 Release Note Candidate (#6486)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #6486. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6486#event-3863971157

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Make tflite frontend more data driven / improve errors. (#5519)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
Reopened #5519. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5519#event-3863969024

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Make tflite frontend more data driven / improve errors. (#5519)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #5519. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5519#event-3863965654

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Move to use main as default branch (#6623)

2020-10-11 Thread Tianqi Chen
As of now, the default branch has been changed to main. I have also spend some time to update base branch of the existing PRs, but it would be great to double check for a bit when we merge PR this week. @apache/tvm-committers please check the information when merging a PR ([XXX] want to merge