An alternative approach might be just using an Array to store key-value pairs,
but the problem around is that we need extra effort serializing/deserializing
Map from/to Arrays
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/byoc-runtime-json-runtime-for-byoc/6579/20) to
respond.
You are rece
I thought about array as well. Passing array to initialize is relatively
simple. The more tricky part is packing the data and passing them around using
packedfunc.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/byoc-runtime-json-runtime-for-byoc/6579/19) to
respond.
You are receiving this b
We want to think about alternative ways to pass in the meta data, for example
we could call initialize using array instead of Map. While it is OK to use Map
in runtime, we will face a similar issue in ucontrollers where it is harder to
pass in a Map structure
---
[Visit
Topic](https://di
Thank you for the reply @remotego, I agree with your views. As you mentioned,
using OpenCL is a good way to bootstrap an accelerator design quickly. I myself
did that with VTA when I wrote it in HLS as a grad student, so I see its value!
There are definitely strong pros/cons of HDLs vs. HLS la
cc @junrushao1994 as well
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/byoc-runtime-json-runtime-for-byoc/6579/17) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/e9cc785a0991
Hi,
I think the runtime support here
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/3554) is for uop and instructions
sync via PCIe. However, if we want to run a full network (e.g., Resnet), we're
still missing layer-wise synchronization/device_copy if two adjacent layers are
resident in diff
Considering runtime support, I think the answer is yes, see
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/3554 . However, to run the VTA
tutorials on PCIe based FPGAs, driver-level support is not yet implemented.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-vta-support-for-cloud-devices-
cc @ajtulloch
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5754#issuecomment-642375802
Thanks for the great work! I have some quick question:
1. Have you tested various models arm cpu? (like A53, A72, A55, A75 and so on).
According to fb qnnpack blog, it is not always could get best performance using
`umul` compared with `smlal` instruction (used by now).
(https://engineering.fb.c
Here is the draft PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5770
We may need to use Map to save the variable to constant/NDArray mapping. Should
we move the `ModuleInitWrapper` out of runtime because it otherwise needs to
have map in the runtime namespace?
I used `SourceMetadataModule`
Hi
It seems that there is already runtime support for PCIe based FPGAs
(https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/tvm-monthly-july-2019/3600). Is that right?
@liangfu @thierry @hjiang @remotego
@zhanghaohit
Thank you
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-vta-support-for-cloud-devices-opencl
I am working on a POD-C compliant hash map
[[link](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5740)], which might be
helpful some how. However, representing those stuff in Relay IR is still
challenging.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-topi-hashtable-support/5842/13
Just wanted to add a +1 to A1 as it seems like the best way to gradually move
TVM towards dynamism without breaking things in the meantime.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/dynamic-ops-in-relay/6909/11) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To
Seems we have converged on A1 with the additional clarifications in this thread
:slight_smile:
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/dynamic-ops-in-relay/6909/10) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here]
@lfengad Could we follow up this? Because we have supported String and Array
now.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-topi-hashtable-support/5842/12) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here
Hi,
I'm new to TVM and want to use VTA on our Intel Stratix10 FPGA. I have some
questions regarding that, any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
1- Considering that there is no hard core on our FPGA board, how should we use
the runtime? Should we just keep it on the host side/compile mach
Now I think dynamic rank support should be a separated issue. Maybe we can
discuss that in another thread.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/dynamic-ops-in-relay/6909/9) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [c
17 matches
Mail list logo
