My motivation was indeed for peer collaboration or interactive peer
conversations and an additional use of existing tools in the toolbox.
regards
Ramana
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/tvm-online-meetups/6382/4) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing lis
re: slack. Right now the slack channel is open for every to join. to keep
things simple, we view slack as non-achival, which means design discussions and
RFCs are preferred to be bought into the discuss or github(both of them
archives to ASF mail-list)
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tv
I think this is a good initiative. However it is quite expensive in terms of
logistics and organization.
Additionally it's probably time to think about using the slack channels more
and ensuring that conversations on slack move to the discuss forums or the PRs
once the interactive conversati
We here at [OctoML](https://octoml.ai) are thinking of hosting an online TVM
meetup to give people a way to connect while working from home and interact in
a higher bandwidth medium than here or Github issues. Following the [TVM
meeting guidelines](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/tvm-meetup-guideline
@maheshambule can you followup a bit by commenting a bit aout C0 and C1
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-to-onnx/6101/9) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/emai
Some of the thoughts (wrt to your items)
- A1 backport correctness bugfixes (in the developer guide)
- A2 split out the PR that needs involves regression fix (and tag them as
[BUGFIX]). Add another tag `[BACKPORT-version]` for backporting to a previous
version.
- A5 for now, keep supporting th
That sounds good. @ramana-arm it would be great if you send an RFC with a
particular proposal(since some of the original items are posed as discussions),
some of them can go to the reviewer guide.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/development-process-and-backporting-patches-to-re
ok make sense. if all agree, we could improve our fallback way to make tvm blob
in the rodata section
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-module-based-model-runtime-interface/5025/62)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe
I wasn't proposing that as a solution, that is one of the options. I'm merely
stating that this is still a problem that will hit others most notably anyone
using the C backend .
Ramana
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-module-based-model-runtime-interface/5025/61)
to r
I think I should clarify your question. Do you mean we should generate .rodata
section of `unsighed char __tvm_data_blob[]`?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-module-based-model-runtime-interface/5025/60)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing lis
So, the problem hasn't been fixed : there is a "solution" depending on the
presence of an llvm target.
Ramana
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-module-based-model-runtime-interface/5025/59)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To un
When we don’t have LLVM, we will fallback to our original way (call compiler to
generate)
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-module-based-model-runtime-interface/5025/58)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these
This won't work by default for the C backend where we don't necessarily rely on
the presence of llvm or are we saying that there needs to be an llvm solution
for the backend just to produce this constant data object always, so we do need
a general solution
Ramana
---
[Visit
Topic]
I would start with incorporating these points in the "Development Process" bits
in the TVM documentation. Will put up a pull request since no one has commented
on this in about 2 months.
Ramana
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/development-process-and-backporting-patches-to-rele
As far as I can tell, we'd still need MergeComposite. The main difference would
be that we could replace the custom pattern-matching solution with this generic
and more powerful pattern-matching. However, the creation of the composite
functions will need to remain.
---
[Visit
Topic](http
15 matches
Mail list logo
