Anyone interested in adding PRELU (id 54) to tflite frontend?
I have custom tflite model which uses it.
http://tracking.discuss.tvm.ai/tracking/click?d=O5itvT09mHlu_F8ZIICX09Depp-8XgNXxc6Hc2IknD8bmKSO9aybJj4w1XPzynxo4H4xTrmXLS1MKf92oZ8x6nwnys-xR7-T48a5LHvHuMmXdmHm8KiDT-GfCVL-uCHTOZFQME2tcH9ehUr
Yes, we can do that
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4259#issuecomment-552038806
@tqchen Shall we print warning message when ppl use nnvm?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4259#issuecomment-552027579
wrt to nnvm. Our original proposal is to keep nnvm until v0.6 release. Which
means nnvm will appear in v0.6 with limited support(the legacy api still passes
test cases). Then we will remove nnvm compiler support after v0.6 release
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thr
I updated the issue, please let us know if anything's missing.
(I didn't include "Build and Test" and "Bug fixes" section as the entire
content happens to be long enough that github prevents me from posting it.)
One thing we need to discuss is whether NNVM needs to be deprecated in v0.6
release
previous discussions here
https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-use-object-protocol-for-module-ndarray/4583
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4286#issuecomment-55200154
The [unified object protocol](https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/4116) is now
used by almost all of our runtime objects. However, there are still two
exceptions: Module and NDArray. This RFC tries to discuss the possibility to
unify them to the object protocol.
The advantage for unification is
Though C++ RPC haven't been reviewed, but personally, I wish C++ RPC
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4281 could enter into 0.6, which
is a very useful feature in embedded devices, we almost use it in our
production development every day.
--
You are receiving this because you are
That's a great idea. It would be a great advance to include support for 3D
models.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4009#issuecomment-551604526
I am interested in running 3D networks!
Thank you
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4009#issuecomment-551452672
10 matches
Mail list logo
