@tqchen Thanks. Both ok for us, as long as we can get a release in one or two
month, is that possible?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/4212#issuecomment-548680219
Yes. we are thinking about release 0.6 after the repo migration, but please
share your thoughts
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/4212#issuecomment-548464595
Opened PR #4234 for the re-implementation of our solution based on tensor
intrinsic. Many thanks to @Hzfengsy for his valuable suggestions and close
collaboration with us on this.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on Git
> I have a proposal to minimize the invasion in TVM and also fundamentally
> support TensorCore in TVM. This is in the middle of both methodology of #4052
> and this RFC.
> I suppose the current pain point of supporting TensorCore is the data
> structure provided by NVIDIA, which introduces non-
Are we going to release 0.6 in new repo? @tqchen
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/4212#issuecomment-548286904
