@tqchen Will update this soon (sorry for being busy with some other things
recently).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3388#issuecomment-509499452
We have made good progress on the Quantization RFC, achieving clarity and
convergence on many points.
For this PR specifically, @tqchen and @FrozenGene, can you please comment if
this looks in line with our quantization RFC.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
R
Is this ready for review? Have we been converged on the design in the
quantization RFC?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3512#issuecomment-509430172
@tqchen @FrozenGene @ZihengJiang @zhiics @wweic @eqy
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3512#issuecomment-509422639
Rebased to new PR #3512
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3457#issuecomment-509421969
Closed #3457.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3457#event-2467657739
@jianyuh can you add a pre-condition to the test cases so it skips the test
when LLVM8 is not enabled? You can use
https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/blob/9bfdc55c572e03f6cfac6994a9e75f8fd9252850/python/tvm/intrin.py#L193
to lookup the intrinsic to see if it is available.
--
You are receiving this be
