On 01/04/2011 07:04 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/4 jean-frederic clere:
On 01/04/2011 11:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
Next week
Hi,
I plan to tag TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_21 to release it later, is that OK?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.30 on Monday, please complain if you disagree.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.30/
According to the release process, the 6.0.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_30 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
According to the results 6.0.30 is going to be released as STABLE.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.30 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.29.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache Tomc
On 01/17/2011 03:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to look over the remaining STATUS of 5.5 in hopes of
getting a 5.5.32 out soon... I'll RM.
Comments?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@to
On 01/20/2011 05:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The memory leak in the Tomcat 7 NIO connector [1] got back-ported to
6.0.x and included in 6.0.30. [2]
I have proposed the fix for 6.0.x. Given the severity I think we need to
approve the backport and start a 6.0.31 release asap.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Fred
Hi,
Due the regression in NIO we need a release, I plan to tag on Monday
afternoon my time, comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
On 01/23/2011 09:41 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The only bug remaining that impact the JSTL libraries is #46052 (locale
performance on 1.6). Henri suggested releasing in its current form which sounds
reasonable. Should we release this as 1.2.0? Is this a good version number -
should we use someth
On 01/27/2011 10:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/25 jean-frederic clere:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[x] Beta
That is
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.32 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.32 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All
users of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should upgrade to 6.0.32.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one a
On 03/09/2011 11:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/03/2011 22:36, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 9 22:36:55 2011
New Revision: 1080040
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080040&view=rev
Log:
Fix Async with APR and TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT
Who ever it was that reported async un
Hi,
Later today I will tag and go for the release, make sure all the patches
you want to see in are committed :-)
It will also add binaries for tc-native
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
On 12/21/2009 09:20 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Dec 21 20:20:02 2009
New Revision: 892964
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892964&view=rev
Log:
my vote.
I have commit the corresponding thing. the remaining patch need more
work. I will tag now.
Cheers
Jean-F
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
Meaning:
1. Wrong tcnative
2. Build is not reproducable
I'd say the packaging is bro
On 12/21/2009 11:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.12.2009 22:36, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Dec 21 21:36:07 2009
New Revision: 892991
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892991&view=rev
Log:
Only update the build file that doesn't change the minimum tcnative
version re
On 12/22/2009 10:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binari
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21-try2/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
The differences are only the tcnative windows binary files: tcnative was
broken in the previous try.
On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Servlet TCK passes
JSP TCK passes - 1 failure
This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The
fix for bug 47453 created a regression in that the constraint expressed
in JSP.2.3.4 namely thatA String literal can be provided, as
lo
On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 23.12.2009 00:45, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/22 Mark Thomas:
(...)
Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the
patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before
the tag.
Mark
+1 to re-tag.
And
On 12/23/2009 10:35 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/23:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Dec 23 09:28:08 2009
New Revision: 893443
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893443&view=rev
Log:
my votes.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893375&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893378&
On 12/23/2009 01:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/12/2009 08:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Servlet TCK passes
JSP TCK passes - 1 failure
This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The
fix for bug 47453 created a regressi
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
6.0.21 was too broken to be used. Take your time I won't release before
next week and before enough votes
On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/12/2009 17:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
>> [X
On 01/04/2010 01:25 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I removed the libtcnative-1.dll files of Tomcat Native 1.1.18 from
> www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.18/binaries
>
> Those were the wrong ones, dynamically linked with apr and ssl,
> as already discussed in t
On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/1/4 :
>> Author: rjung
>> Date: Mon Jan 4 16:58:04 2010
>> New Revision: 895700
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895700&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix apr version test i tcnative trunk.
>>
>> Modified:
>>tomcat/native/trunk/native/b
On 01/04/2010 06:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> What is the use of the file
>
>native/srclib/VERSIONS
>
> in tcnative?
>
> Ib the 1.1.x branch it contains the info:
>
> =
> Use the following version of the libraries
>
> - APR 1.2.8, http://apr.apache.or
On 01/06/2010 07:47 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 01:21 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/1/5 Mladen Turk:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Native 1.1.19 is available for testing.
>>> Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building
>>> against
>>> OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me b
On 01/07/2010 01:01 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>> Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
>>
>
> I know it's a pickle season, and you guys
> are all busy digesting Christmas and New Year eve's
> meals, but can I have some votes here :)
Yep, I am still wasted (my stomach at least).
+1 I had some problems
On 01/07/2010 05:50 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 b
On 01/08/2010 11:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>>
>> We need a httpd module (
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.23 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Please complain if that is not ok.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomca
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
On 01/14/2010 04:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> doco stuff you can go right ahead and change without status IIRC
I was about to do it but we have
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions that could replace it.
Should I use the link to the wiki?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 01/14/2010 04:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/01/2010 14:23, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
>> [
lease some things which
is not TCK compliant.
Rollback r899138 should fix those TCK issues, no?
Cheeers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Filip
>
> On 01/14/2010 07:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/t
On 01/14/2010 11:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The subject says it all really. Still no sign of the TCK so there are
> probably some bugs in my understanding/interpretation of the spec.
According to my tests:
EL : 11 failures. (They looks similar I will have a closer look later).
JSP : 1 failures. (
On 01/15/2010 10:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> According to my tests:
> EL : 11 failures. (They looks similar I will have a closer look later).
java/javax/el/ArrayELResolver.java setValue exceptions are missing (Look
in http://java.sun.com/javaee/6/docs/api/javax/el/ArrayELResolver.
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.24 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Please complain if that is not ok.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomca
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
On 01/19/2010 01:59 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/ generated from /native/trunk,
> or from /native/branches/1.1.x/ ?
>
> Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
> for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.
>
> There are two errors:
>
Hi,
We have 6 binding Stable votes.
I'll proceed with copying the files to
dist, updating the web pages and make an Announcement.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional c
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.24 stable. This release includes many bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.20.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache
On 01/22/2010 07:01 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/1/21 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2010/1/21 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 21/01/2010 04:33, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have 6 binding Stable votes.
>>>> I'll
On 01/22/2010 07:37 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> With r902006 and r902008 applied, the changelog.xml of trunk is now
> rendered as HTML by certain browsers. It works for me in Firefox 3.6
> and in IE 7.0. You can try it yourselves by the following link:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tom
ks!
> --
> Jason Brittain
> MuleSoft http://www.mulesoft.com
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:47 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
>> Tomcat 6.0.24 stable. This release includes many bug-fixes o
On 01/29/2010 03:29 AM, Jason Brittain wrote:
> Maybe you have a conflicting jsch jar file that ends up getting loaded in
> front of the
> correct/newer version. Look for all jsch jars on your machine and see what
> versions
> they are, and maybe temporarily (re)move older ones.
It seems I have o
On 02/08/2010 08:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a nasty bug that crashes the JVM on shutdown cause
> by Library.terminate call while we are inside Socket.accept
>
> The reason for crash is that we reference later in code the
> memory that was already destroyed with apr_pool_terminate
On 02/10/2010 09:32 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jfclere
> Date: Wed Feb 10 08:32:11 2010
> New Revision: 908386
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908386&view=rev
> Log:
> Just a ref to Not a vulnerability in Tomcat.
>
Should I put the work-around in the "Not a vulnerability i
On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Native 1.1.20 is available for testing.
> Compared with 1.1.19 and earlier versions it has a bug fix that
> prevents crashing JVM on shutdown.
>
> If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
> downloaded from:
> http://tomc
On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>
+1 on my side :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were
On 02/17/2010 10:46 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and supp
On 02/19/2010 05:19 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/19/2010 05:06 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Not a mod_proxy guru, but filtering X-header from responses should be
>>> near
>>> trivial based on past experience with the proxy code.
>>
>>
>> There is the GPL licence 'problem' of the Hyperic lib which s
On 02/24/2010 01:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> As I'm sure you've seen from the slew of commit messages, I've been
> through the 6.0.x status file and applied all the eligible patches.
>
> The only patch I think we need to have for 6.0.25 that doesn't have
> enough votes is the fix for
> https://iss
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
On 02/23/2010 04:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
Looks ok in all my builds.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
On 02/25/2010 01:07 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
> So far all looks OK - but due to the version issue - I vote:
> [X] Broken
>
> I believe rebuilding with an updated properties (no retag needed) should
> fix the issue.
Yep it is just a packaging problem.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
> New Revision: 917921
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917921&view=rev
> Log:
> Add unafe legacy renegotiation support
How does that interacts with
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881179&vi
On 03/02/2010 05:47 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 05:43 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
>>> New Revision: 917921
>>>
>>> URL: ht
On 03/02/2010 08:54 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Time for another one folks? Should I tag end of this week?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomc
-Rex
>
> 2010/3/3 Mladen Turk
>
>> On 03/03/2010 08:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>>> Stable [3]
>>> Broken [2]
>>>
>>> So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
>>>
>>>
>> And few
Hi,
Just that JIRA stuff has been created for the GSoC. Should we move our
entries there?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314021
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
On 03/05/2010 06:28 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Fri Mar 5 17:28:00 2010
> New Revision: 919515
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919515&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote and comment.
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
>
> Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STAT
On 03/05/2010 06:28 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Fri Mar 5 17:28:00 2010
> New Revision: 919515
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919515&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote and comment.
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
>
> Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STAT
On 03/05/2010 09:24 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I sent some patches to Jean-Fred about the LocalString_fr.properties.
I have noticed it is in fact fix in trunk but not in tc6.0.x I have
submitted a new proposal. Please double check... It is not my day today :-/
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
Monday.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apac
On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
>> Monday.
>> Comments?
>
> +1. Do you really mean release on Monday?
hm... Star
On 03/08/2010 09:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sund
On 03/08/2010 12:01 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/3/8 jean-frederic clere :
>> On 03/08/2010 09:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 06/03/201
On 03/09/2010 01:47 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Overall, We'd be better off leaving everything as it is.
> 6.0.24 had a huge amount of changes, and also a series of rapid
> regressions, and probably more to follow.
> To keep the branch stable, we should work in a stable manner, RTC has
> w
On 03/09/2010 04:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/3/9 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> Do not forget to update both
>> version.minor
>> version.suffix
>
> I meant
> version.build
> version.suffix
Yep. I will double check that.
-
T
On 03/09/2010 04:59 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> And to include french translations fixes :)
those are r920841
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.26/
According to the release process, the 6.0.26 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
On 03/11/2010 08:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 07:52 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/10/2010 11:10 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>
You want to have each webapp served by a different process ?
Or even different v
On 03/10/2010 06:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/03/2010 17:46, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:35 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Wed Mar 10 17:35:43 2010
>>> New Revision: 921464
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921464&view=rev
>>> Log:
Stable [6]
So I will go on with the release process.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 03/11/2010 03:44 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Somehow http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/ as of now displays a
> set of empty folders.
>
> Maybe that will fix itself in few minutes (e.g. if replication is
> still in progress)??
>
> I looked at file permissions at p.a.o, and do not see
On 03/11/2010 05:27 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> More important one is to use the web server connectors directly.
> It's not about speed, but about eliminating connector as a
> point of failure.
>
hm You still have to move the data for httpd (in C) to Tomcat (in JAVA)
so you still have a connector, n
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.26 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.24.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache Tomca
The JIRA are needed just for http://tinyurl.com/asfgsoc
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
l
> 0: Filip
>
> RESULT: Passes
>
>> 6. Require some indication in the commit message for code that usually is
>> covered by RTC, that this commit was done using C-T-R rule.
>
> +1: Mladen, Rainer, Bi
Hi,
We all want to see a Tomcat track at the ApacheConNA2010, don't we?
I have created a wiki page to collect the presentation proposals.
Fell free to add the stuff you would like to present at the ApacheCon.
The tomcat PMC will review it and then propose it to the planners of
conference.
Note w
On 03/18/2010 05:05 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:00 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>> Note we have until the Sunday, March 21st to collect that information.
>>
>
> I'm always amazed with the fact that each conference
> planner need your prop
On 03/18/2010 05:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:19 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm always amazed with the fact that each conference
>>> planner need your proposals by yesterday.
>>
>> Well they were asking that the 16th,
On 03/22/2010 05:40 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote:
> Thanks Mark for your reply.
>
> Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be useful, then I'll continue
> working on it and prepare a proposal.
>
> The other idea which seemed to be interesting is the one on implementing a
> connector to support S
On 04/01/2010 06:30 AM, Mahesh Fernando wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 28/03/2010 17:16, Mahesh Fernando wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I'm interested about JSR 196 implementation idea. I have some questions.
>>> is there anyone to mentor this project?
>> [1]
On 04/05/2010 06:11 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> next protocol negotiation
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-00.html
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For addi
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
> alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
> expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
>
> The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready
On 04/14/2010 03:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on
On 04/14/2010 04:13 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> The APR gives some errors for example Address already in use:8080
>> on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
>
On 04/14/2010 07:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
>> [X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
>> [ ] Stable - go ahea
On 04/28/2010 05:14 AM, Karl San Gabriel wrote:
> Is this valid for non-US citizens?
There is a list j...@apache.org for ASF related jobs, please use that
one for this topic.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
On 09/25/2015 10:51 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2015-09-25 9:29 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
I'm not so sure. HTTP/2 explicitly doesn't support HTTP upgrade. The
HTTP/2 spec expects protocols like WebSocket to use ALPN. Despite this,
there has been work to try and layer WebSocket on top of HTTP/2.
At
On 10/05/2015 05:47 PM, r...@apache.org wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Mon Oct 5 15:47:21 2015
New Revision: 1706858
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1706858&view=rev
Log:
A flush seems to be missing when writing a window update [for consistency at
least].
It seems it helps: with my demo fro
401 - 500 of 764 matches
Mail list logo
