JKStatus Bug?

2006-05-16 Thread dhay
Hi, We're using 3 load-balancers to seperate our requests up (client and admin etc.) and numerous tomcat servers (we're running Apache in front). We need to be able to disable servers on a load-balancer level - so I need to disable 2 of the 3 load balancers on a particular server, say. We can do

Re: JKStatus Bug?

2006-05-16 Thread dhay
Hi Rainer, Thanks for the reply. As far as configuration change suggestions, how about making things more fine-grained, so you can specify the worker within the balancer - eg: worker.adminloadbalancer.BLUFF.disabled=1 Presumably something like that is happening within jkstatus? cheers, Da

Re: JKStatus Bug?

2006-05-16 Thread dhay
Actually that's the other way my colleague and I came up with. It seems a little clumsier, but will work for us. > I'll see, what I can do ... Thanks. What kind of timeframe are we looking at? cheers, David |-+> | | Rainer Jung | |

JKStatus bug - disabled=true with only one Tomcat?

2006-05-23 Thread dhay
Hi, It seems that if there is only one tomcat server connected via mod_jk and disabled is set to true (ie disabled=1) for that server that this is ignored and requests still make it through. Is this a bug, or a feature?! cheers, David --

Re: mod_jk 1.2.19 release candidate: ready to test

2006-09-19 Thread dhay
Just a quick question - does this REQUIRE Apache 2.0.58 or is verified it works with it? We're using Apache 2.0.54 but want to upgrade our mod_jk only. cheers, David x54680 |-+> | | Jim Jagielski| | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED