Re: Tomcat 6.0.33 ?

2011-08-12 Thread Petr Sumbera
Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote: > > On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug >>> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189). >>> Did there is any date for 6.0.33 release ?

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.33

2011-08-17 Thread Petr Sumbera
Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote: > > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.33/ > [x] Stable Solaris 11; JVM Version: 1.6.0_26-b03 Sources builds just fine. No issue seen while testing basic functionality compared to version 6.0.32. Thanks,

tomcat-users.xml Unix file permissions and security (possible patch)

2009-02-12 Thread Petr Sumbera
Hi all, >From Tomcat tar archive I get: ls -l apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml -rw--- 1 tomcat staff 1107 Jul 21 2008 apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml But Tomcat itself changes this during its first run: ls -l apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml -rw-r-

tomcat 6.0.20 problem with read only "conf" directory

2009-06-10 Thread Petr Sumbera
Hi, while preparing Tomcat upgrade from 6.0.18 to 6.0.20 for OpenSolaris I realized that I see error in log because "conf" directory is not writable: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /var/tomcat6/conf/Catalina/localhost/host-manager.xml (No such file or directory) at java.io.FileOutputStre

Re: tomcat 6.0.20 problem with read only "conf" directory

2009-06-10 Thread Petr Sumbera
markt-2 wrote: > > I believe read only conf dir should be valid option. >> >> Any comment on this? > > As far as I recall, the conf directory has always needed to be writeable > in 6.0.x. > For what reasons? I only remember tomcat-users.xml needed to be writable. But with read only (now by d

Tomcat 6 with JDK 1.6 (why not use commons-dbcp-1.4)

2010-07-13 Thread Petr Sumbera
Hi, why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4 it seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to choose? Thanks, Petr --- apache-tomcat-6.0.28-src/build.properties.default.orig +++ apache-tomcat-6.0.28-src/build.properties.default -# -

Re: Tomcat 6 with JDK 1.6 (why not use commons-dbcp-1.4)

2010-07-13 Thread Petr Sumbera
markt-2 wrote: > > On 13/07/2010 12:08, Petr Sumbera wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4 >> it >> seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to >> choose? >

UMASK issue after update from tomcat 8.0 to 8.5

2016-07-21 Thread Petr Sumbera
Hi, after update to 8.5 we have ran into an issue where our Jenkins build jobs were failing and complaining that we can't access files. This is caused by following change in 8.5: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1713174 Shouldn't this be mentioned at least at: https://tom