Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote:
>
> On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
>>> Did there is any date for 6.0.33 release ?
Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote:
>
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.33/
>
[x] Stable
Solaris 11; JVM Version: 1.6.0_26-b03
Sources builds just fine.
No issue seen while testing basic functionality compared to version 6.0.32.
Thanks,
Hi all,
>From Tomcat tar archive I get:
ls -l apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml
-rw--- 1 tomcat staff 1107 Jul 21 2008
apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml
But Tomcat itself changes this during its first run:
ls -l apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml
-rw-r-
Hi,
while preparing Tomcat upgrade from 6.0.18 to 6.0.20 for OpenSolaris I
realized that I see error in log because "conf" directory is not writable:
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
/var/tomcat6/conf/Catalina/localhost/host-manager.xml (No such file or
directory)
at java.io.FileOutputStre
markt-2 wrote:
>
> I believe read only conf dir should be valid option.
>>
>> Any comment on this?
>
> As far as I recall, the conf directory has always needed to be writeable
> in 6.0.x.
>
For what reasons? I only remember tomcat-users.xml needed to be writable.
But with read only (now by d
Hi,
why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4 it
seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to
choose?
Thanks,
Petr
--- apache-tomcat-6.0.28-src/build.properties.default.orig
+++ apache-tomcat-6.0.28-src/build.properties.default
-# -
markt-2 wrote:
>
> On 13/07/2010 12:08, Petr Sumbera wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4
>> it
>> seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to
>> choose?
>
Hi,
after update to 8.5 we have ran into an issue where our Jenkins build
jobs were failing and complaining that we can't access files.
This is caused by following change in 8.5:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1713174
Shouldn't this be mentioned at least at:
https://tom