he
professor, we're not really doing this as a course requirement but rather
out of our personal interest in contributing to open source. The scope of
the class project is 2-3 weeks but that of course doesn't mean we'll
abandon the code after that :)
Thanks,
Petr Praus
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 03:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 02:23, Jonathan Drake wrote:
> > I'm one the three CS grad students working on WebSocket (along with Petr
> > Praus).
> >
> > Just wanted to give an update on our progress, to let you know what we&#
Hi, sorry for the delay, we got stalled a little bit, I'll post the patch
today (US central time) after I manage to merge it (oh the cursed newlines).
Thanks,
Petr
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 14:18, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> On 2/10/12 12:08 PM, Jeremy B
cketConnection since it's
bidirectional. Also I gave the upgrade processors close() methods.
Fixed a number of bugs, including a switch statement with accidentally
cascading cases, and a problem with in Conversions.byteArrayToLong()."
Thanks,
Petr
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 17:17, Petr Praus
Thanks Johno Crawford for pointing out that attachments are stripped, I
uploaded the patch here: https://gist.github.com/1844837
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 22:01, Petr Praus wrote:
> Hello, attached is our patch. It applies cleanly on top of current trunk
> rev. 1244719. It has rudimentary s
gmentation
testing.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 14:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/02/2012 04:01, Petr Praus wrote:
> > Hello, attached is our patch. It applies cleanly on top of current trunk
> > rev. 1244719. It has rudimentary support for fragmentation (callback
> > after last fram
github apache/tomcat mirror).
Petr
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 14:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/02/2012 10:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 20/02/2012 02:55, Petr Praus wrote:
> >> but I wanted to ask - have you considered using Autobahn for
> >> testing? It's rather ext
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 16:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/02/2012 21:28, Petr Praus wrote:
> > I'm glad to hear that.
> >
> > BTW, Jonathan quite significantly overhauled our implementation over the
> > weekend. The WebSocketFrame no longer buffers data bu
