On 08/10/2009 11:17 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 08/10/2009 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Http11Processor.java
inputBuffer.parseRequestLine();
request.setStartTime(System.currentTimeMillis());
keptAlive = true;
if (disableUploadTimeout) {
socket.setSoTime
On 08/13/2009 10:48 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Post discussion between Tomcat PMC and Jakarta PMC (with myself as the
go between), the Jakarta Taglibs subproject is going to move over to
Tomcat land. Chiefly this means:
* The JSTL implementations: 1.0, 1.1 and unreleased 1.2.
* RDC Taglib.
* An in
On 09/16/2009 06:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 16.09.2009 17:24, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 16/09/09 16:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Sep 16 13:24:54 2009
New Revision: 815768
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815768&view=rev
Log:
Sync java parts of tcna
On 10/10/2009 12:24 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you're gonna run into all the same issues we already worked through with
tribes. I'm not sure why you don't just use tribes rather than
reinventing everything from scratch
Well it is not exactly solving the same problem, here we need a prot
On 10/12/2009 03:27 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 10/12/2009 01:06 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 10/10/2009 12:24 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you're gonna run into all the same issues we already worked through with
tribes. I'm not sure why you don't just us
On 10/19/2009 06:42 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Anyone volunteering for 1.1.17 RM?
We have one nasty bug with OpenSSL/Windows that
users are constantly complaining about, and since
the patch is already in the SVN and confirmed to
solve the issue I see no problem we push for a
new release.
If no
On 10/20/2009 05:57 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
j-f-c has through his social networking skills indicated he is working
on it :)
jean-frederic, are you?
Yep I have tagged, prepared tarball. So we will be able to vote on it soon.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
On 10/19/2009 10:42 AM, Mlad
Hi,
Native 1.1.17 is available for testing.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/
Some binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/binarie
Hi everyone,
There is a Tomcat meetup organized at the ApacheCon on Monday 2d of
November at 20h00.
To register
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dEJLcHk3c1ZrRm8tWUNYeXZZckN0Vnc6MA
For more information or add idem you want to present go to
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Tomcat
On 10/20/2009 09:55 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.17 is available for testing.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/
Some binaries will be available at:
http
On 10/26/2009 03:31 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:55 +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
So we +3
On 11/16/2009 02:28 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Nov 16 13:28:11 2009
New Revision: 880742
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=880742&view=rev
Log:
My vote.
Well native is Commit-Then-Review. Mladen please commit.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Modified:
tomcat/nat
On 11/17/2009 08:46 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 16/11/09 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 11/16/2009 02:28 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Well native is Commit-Then-Review. Mladen please commit.
Done.
Do you wish to tag the 1.1.18?
Yes.
If do, don't forget this time to d
Hi,
Native 1.1.18 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.17 It just contains the fix for CVE-2009-3555
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/1.1.18
Some binaries will be available
On 11/18/2009 05:44 PM, sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2009, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Nov 18 14:34:47 2009
New Revision: 881789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881789&view=rev
Log:
Add my new key and remove the old one.
Just the old one will be too short soon
On 11/18/2009 09:43 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
JF, could you provide a new tarball with the configure included.
I couldn't built it under OS/X since buildconf failed about missing :
cp: /usr/bin/build/apr_common.m4: No such file or directory
cp: /usr/bin/build/find_apr.m4: No such file or directory
On 11/19/2009 08:51 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
did you run buildconf ?
jnirelease.sh should have done that...
Investigating...
I'm running SnowLeopard
I still have to update my box
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
2009/11/19 jean-frederic clere:
On 11/18/2009 09:43 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
On 11/19/2009 09:41 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
It works with the update tarball :
The updated tarball is now available at
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/1.1.18/
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsu
Hi,
It seems there is a bunch of KEYS file in the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat and in the web site.
Should we only have one of those?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
On 11/23/2009 03:23 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
It seems there is a bunch of KEYS file in the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat and in the web site.
Should we only have one of those?
> find . -name KEYS
./tomcat-4/KEYS
./tomcat-5/v5.5.28/KEYS
./tomcat-5/KEYS
./tomcat-5/v5.5
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.18 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.16 and fixes the client initiated part of
cve-2009-3555, note that the server initiated renegociation was added in
1.1.17 (and is
On 06/22/2011 03:56 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 22 13:56:05 2011
New Revision: 1138468
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138468&view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.o
On 06/22/2011 08:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2011 17:43, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/22/2011 03:56 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 22 13:56:05 2011
New Revision: 1138468
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138468&view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modi
On 07/20/2011 11:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.07.2011 17:28, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Jul 20 15:28:05 2011
New Revision: 1148815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148815&view=rev
Log:
Improve fix for PR50394 Requires native 1.1.21
Does it require it uncondit
On 07/21/2011 01:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/7/19:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Jul 19 08:06:46 2011
New Revision: 1148216
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148216&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR49595
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.java
--- tomca
On 07/21/2011 03:55 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Why is this change needed? Look around current line 139, which already
handles that case. All the options are set there and the code before
your change mimics the code in httpd. I tested it recently and thought
it's correct for all protocol settings.
O
Hi,
I plan to tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/native/tags/TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_21/
tomorrow.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
On 07/25/2011 11:21 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
nope, let's go for release.
BTW, what's the main changes ?
Just bug fixes. I will update the changelog now.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.ap
On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Servlet EG is starting to discuss changes to the Servlet API for
3.1. It would be useful if the option existed to implement some of these
changes in Tomcat trunk. The benefits of this are:
- we can see how feasible the API changes are to implement
-
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and earlier versions it fixes some bugs.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/source
(Will be visible after the server s
On 07/27/2011 02:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/
Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for.
You should have
On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi guys,
We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
Did there is any date for 6.0.33 release ?
Any committer can roll a release. Last time I checked
On 07/27/2011 06:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 16:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
1. Should tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk be RTC or CTR?
CTR
2. With tomcat/trunk becoming the basis for Tomcat 8, I would like to
see earlier and more frequent alpha/beta r
On 07/27/2011 02:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/
Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for.
You should have
On 07/28/2011 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 10:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and earlier versions it fixes some bugs.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http
On 07/28/2011 01:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/07/2011 10:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/07/2011 10:04, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/28/2011 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 10:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and
On 07/28/2011 11:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 28.07.2011 21:23, Henri Gomez wrote:
So here's the vote.
It will be closed in about 72 hours
(or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
There is no configure available into jni/native this time ?
I mention that because buildconf require APR sour
On 07/28/2011 09:23 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
So here's the vote.
It will be closed in about 72 hours
(or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
There is no configure available into jni/native this time ?
I mention that because buildconf require APR source directory whereas
I used to build it (
On 07/29/2011 01:09 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Yep I will retagged and reroll the release tomorrow morning, my tests now
looks ok :D
I get the source from the tags and tried to build them on OS/X 10.7 Lion.
Does the JVM there supports the -d32 now?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 07/29/2011 11:41 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Does the JVM there supports the -d32 now?
Yes, Apple JVM support both 32 and 64bits (-d32 / -d64) :
xmac:~ henri$ java -d64 -version
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-384-10M3425)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Serve
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging script.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.22/source
Win32/Win64 binaries ar
On 08/04/2011 10:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:06, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging script.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from
On 08/05/2011 04:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/08/2011 23:32, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 08/04/2011 10:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:06, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging
On 08/01/2011 03:06 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/8/1 Rainer Jung:
- Binaries build against old APR 1.3.12 (recent ist 1.4.5)
and OpenSSL 0.9.8r (recent ist 1.0.1d).
Is that intentional?
(I think you meant 1.0.0d. That is what the latest version is [1]. )
1. Both other products I use
On 07/31/2011 11:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
It is unclear to me, what the current state is. It looks like we support
the unsafe legacy reneg whenever the OpenSSL used during build time
supports it. There is no configuration option to switch it off during
runtime. Right?
Yep it needs a patch in T
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.22 stable.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
Thank you,
--
The
On 08/12/2011 03:23 PM, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote:
On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi guys,
We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
Did there i
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.33/
According to the release process, the 6.0.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_33 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.33 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.33 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All
users of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should upgrade to 6.0.33.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one a
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 09/08/2011 11:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/9/9 Christopher Schultz:
On 9/8/2011 11:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/09/2011 16:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All, https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698
Mark's official report to the users' list indicates that setti
On 10/01/2011 03:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.22
It seems the maven repo doesn't have it yet, is that normal?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscrib
Hi,
Do we want to "organize" a Tomcat meetup during the ApacheCon?
See http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ApacheMeetupsNa11 for space and
already used slots.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomc
Hi,
that looks good, arrange the formatting and create a bugzilla so it is
not forgotten.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apac
On 10/11/2011 04:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Now that JavaOne is over and people are back to their homes, maybe it
is time to roll 6.0.34?
I plan to do that next week.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 10/13/2011 07:26 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Re-reading the security pages I have several notes
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
1) security-6.html and others have the following text:
"Please send comments or corrections for these vuln
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you're other option is to just vote on tcnative separately, and that
way utilize all the ASF mirrors and release sites
But that is exactly what we should *not* do.
Tomcat comes with it's native, so if you upgra
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Still need to figure out what to do with all the other versions in
a.o/dist though - we can't just leave them.
well, someone needs to commit them all to a project's SVN subdir like
'tagged_tarballs' or such;
this way the history would stay available...
Hi
I think t
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat.
tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means they
may not be available for download in the
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat.
tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat.
tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from
tomcat.
tcnative
Hi,
I think that the tcnative releases should be independent from tomcat.
There are several reasons:
- The native code is in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native and it
checked out via links in tc trunk/6.0.x/5.5.x.
- The logic to have tcnative independent is already in the code of trunk
and 6.0
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think that the tcnative releases should be independent from tomcat.
There are several reasons:
- The native code is in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native and it
checked out via links in tc trunk/6.0.x/5.5.x.
- The logic to have tcnative
Yoav Shapira wrote:
I'd vote the same given the new choice. I'm also willing to help with
putting docs up, etc.
On Jan 15, 2008 10:47 AM, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think that the t
Costin Manolache wrote:
Will we have installers for it ?
for the moment a tarball or zip file should be ok, shouldn't it?
Will the installer/release include the
associated libapr ?
Yes.
What about openssl?
I assume both native and java
code will be included ?
I am not sure of that... A
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I stumbled today over DOS line endings in the web.xml file of the
manager contained in TC 6.0.14 tar.gz download.
A little check reveals, that the following files have DOS line endings,
although the tar.gz is supposed to use Unix convention were appropriate:
- RELEAS
Henri Gomez wrote:
Not counting as a guru, but 1.1.12 configure was broken and it was the
problem you observed. See
http://marc.info/?t=11994474831&r=1&w=2
Two fixes in svn applied post 1.1.12:
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=119945392329403&w=2
and
http://marc.info/?t=11994552511&r
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Guy Molinari and myself have completed a Bayuex implementation.
You can find it at:
http://svn.hanik.com/viewvc/tomcat-bayeux/
user: tomcat
password: tomcat
We are now waiting for Guy's CLA to be registered and then we are ready
to contribute it to the Tomcat code
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 AM, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The normal way is to go through the incubator process.
Why? This is not a new project, Guy is not becoming a committer yet.
This is a code contribution from a committer and a volunteer. It
Hi,
I would like to tag tcnative to 1.1.13 to prepare a vote for a release.
A minimal documentation has been prepared to plug in the tomcat-site
pages like tomcat-connectors. The 1.1.12 had a broken configure that is
why we need a 1.1.13.
Any pending fixes/improvements/comments?
Cheers
Jea
Hi,
I have prepared a doc for the tomcat native library.
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tc-native-docs/
The idea is to add it like http://tomcat.apache.org/tc-native-docs
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.13/
According to the release process, the 1.1.13 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscri
, or
TOMCAT_HOME/lib/native (?)
Ok. /usr/local/lib is not so good because it needs root access to install.
and
pre-including it in the startup script ?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Costin
On 2/9/08, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have prepared a doc for the tomcat
Henri Gomez wrote:
Good.
Just a point :
INFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.12.
==>
INFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.13.
I have put x.y ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
:-)
2008/2/9, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I have p
Henri Gomez wrote:
Ok. /usr/local/lib is not so good because it needs root access to install.
Good point.
A system component (part of Tomcat), should be installed by an admin isn't it ?
In this case, should it be installed in the directory of the JVM
installation? I think MINA uses it too.
to the actual fix.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
(Or was I missing something?)
-Tim
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: funkman
Date: Tue Feb 12 08:27:45 2008
New Revision: 620848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=620848&view=rev
Log:
addition of dupl listener rem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: funkman
Date: Tue Feb 12 08:27:45 2008
New Revision: 620848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=620848&view=rev
Log:
addition of dupl listener removal and a vote
Won't it be possible to prevent the addition in the Digester instead?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Costin Manolache wrote:
Yes, JVM is not so good because it changes, I agree /usr/local/lib ( and the
JVM dir ) are only good for people with root access.
What about having 2 options:
- 'system' installation - /usr/local/lib
- 'local' - TOMCAT_HOME/lib/native ( or TOMCAT_HOME/lib/`arch` if same
i
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp
(CATALINA_BASE vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 -> Tomcat 6, common/lib ->
lib etc) I cam across this page.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/status.html
It is horribly out of date and duplicates information
[X] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.13 stable. This release includes many bugfixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.12 and the first official release of Tomcat Native.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add bz number to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add svn rev number
Sure.
and
automatically link changes to the actual commit
How?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
--
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add bz number to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add svn rev number
Sure.
and automatically link changes to the actual commit
How?
627743
becomes
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add bz number to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add svn rev number
Sure.
and automatically
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I used to get the win32 tcnative at http://tomcat.heanet.ie/native/
but there is only a 1.1.12 there.
Do you know alternate location ?
Nothing I am aware of. That is where they are currently uploaded to.
Also, sho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Mar 24 13:09:15 2008
New Revision: 640551
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=640551&view=rev
Log:
Clean-up unused import
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioOutputBuffer.java
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/ap
Hi,
What is the goal of tomcat-oacc exactly.
1 - Replace the actual tc-trunk cluster.
2 - Port the tc-5.5.x code and have an alternate cluster.
3 - Just a try for the fun.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
While trying to build the latest tcnative on a SLES 10 box I got the
following error :
checking for OpenSSL library... using openssl from /usr/lib and /usr/include
checking OpenSSL library version...
Found OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x0090801f
Require OPENSSL_VERSIO
+++ CUT +++
All in all I feel accused by the above formulation.
the answer to this all lies in the fact, that I didn't see an email on
tomcat-dev about OACC creation, so if I missed it, my apologies, but I
cant recall seeing one.
That is in sandbox. sandbox is supposed to be a play-ground fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:37:22 2008
New Revision: 648682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648682&view=rev
Log:
Add watchdog thread to Apache 2. It creates additional thread in child process
if set for unatended maintenance of the workers
Modified:
tom
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:37:22 2008
New Revision: 648682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648682&view=rev
Log:
Add watchdog thread to Apache 2. It creates additional thread in
child process if set
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:37:22 2008
New Revision: 648682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648682&view=rev
Log:
Add watchdog thread to Apache 2. It cre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon May 26 05:42:11 2008
New Revision: 660175
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=660175&view=rev
Log:
Fix 45071 by updating ttl for signaled but not removed sockets
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/CHANGELOG.txt
Please could you put the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu May 29 11:08:20 2008
New Revision: 661428
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=661428&view=rev
Log:
Move the ttl as well when the socket is removed. Patch provided by Alex Barclay
Cool but could you put the information in
jk/xdocs/miscellaneou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri May 30 04:25:04 2008
New Revision: 661653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=661653&view=rev
Log:
Add note to changelog about BZ45071
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Thanks I missed the file name i
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon May 26 05:42:11 2008
New Revision: 660175
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=660175&view=rev
Log:
Fix 45071 by updating ttl for signaled but not removed sockets
Modified:
tomcat/connec
Hi,
I would like to tag tcnative to 1.1.14 to prepare a vote for a release.
Any pending fixes/improvements/comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Henri Gomez wrote:
+0
What's the updates ?
+++
bug 45071
requires openssl 0.9.8a instead 0.9.8b
optGet always throws exception and optSet doesn't.
+++
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
2008/6/24 jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I would like to tag tcnat
Tim Funk wrote:
Dumb question. (More of a curiosity since I see this a lot)
Is there a reason to use:
java.io.File fd =
new java.io.File(paths[j] +
System.getProperty("file.separator") + name);
Instead of
java.io.File fd = new java.io.File(paths[j], name);
You are right
201 - 300 of 764 matches
Mail list logo
