- copied from r1727998, tomcat/trunk/
We are using tomcat/tags for tomcat9 and tomcat/tcn.0.x/tags for the
others, are we going to keep that?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
> Modified:
> tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_0_M3/build.properties.default
> tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_0_M3/webapps
On 02/03/2016 09:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 07:53, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 02/01/2016 09:51 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Mon Feb 1 20:51:24 2016
>>> New Revision: 1728005
>>>
>>> URL: htt
On 02/03/2016 02:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 18:52, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 6.0.45 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.45/
&
On 02/03/2016 05:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Jean-Frederic,
>
> On 11/8/15 5:34 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jfclere Date: Sun Nov 8 10:34:31 2015 New Revision:
>> 1713220
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1713220&view=rev Log:
.txt
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.TestOpenSSLCipherConfigurationParser.NIO2.txt
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.TestOpenSSLCipherConfigurationParser.NIO.txt
+++
I have build my own openssl so I think it is OK, any hints?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On 02/03/2016 07:08 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 16:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 02/02/2016 01:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The proposed 9.0.0.M3 release is:
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.
On 02/04/2016 02:38 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> That looks like something different in the openssl configuration, if
> someone has an hint I can try to find the problem.
Release first and I will look after the release ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Fr
On 02/01/2016 07:52 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 6.0.45 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.45/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.
The following votes were cast:
Binding:
+1: markt, remm, violetagg, jfclere
This vote therefore passes.
Thanks to every one who tested and/or voted.
I'll start the final release steps shortly.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.45.
Apache Tomcat is an open source software implementation of the Java
Servlet, JavaServer Pages and Java Expression Language technologies.
This release contains a number of bug fixes and improvements compared to
ve
ing a cipher that allow HTTP/2 to work with the standard browsers
(like firefox and chrome) make sense otherwise we would be benching an
old "unsafe" cipher.
I can't rerun my apache con tests right now but that time
AES128-GCM-SHA256 was the cipher I used.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
Yes. Do we have a plan when everyone wants to do a push ? (I'm really not a
> fan of it ...)
Through a "private" API until we do 9?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
>
>> - make any necessary changes to work with Java 7
>>
>> - Release 8.0.x and 8.5.x in parallel
On 02/25/2016 02:52 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> b) A more radical option is to use 9 as 8.x but remove the Servlet API
> changes. This would force Java 8 and many incompatible changes.
That looks the best for me, tomcat-8.5.x
Cheers
Jean-Fr
---
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 18/10/2018 00:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Stable, go ahead and release
tested with nio/apr on rhel7 (apr: 1.5.2 openssl: 1.0.2k-fips), fedora28
(apr: 1.6.3 openssl: 1.1.0i-fips).
scripts in https://github.com/jfclere/tomcat-native-tests.git
--
Cheers
Jean-Frede
On 29/11/2018 11:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/11/2018 09:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 29/11/2018 10:46, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Thu Nov 29 09:46:49 2018
>>> New Revision: 1847704
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.a
On 29/11/2018 18:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Jean-Frederic,
>
> On 11/29/18 08:06, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jfclere Date: Thu Nov 29 13:06:21 2018 New Revision:
>> 1847714
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1847714&view=rev Log: Allow
&g
On 29/11/2018 18:25, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Jean-Frederic,
>
> On 11/29/18 12:18, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 29/11/2018 18:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Jean-Frederic,
>>>
>>> On 11/29/18 08:06, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
>>>&
On 30/11/2018 21:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Stable, go ahead and release
tested on fedora29 with tomcat-9.0.13.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
ng fixing master...
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 06/04/2015 03:13 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I think we can safely drop NPN as it seems to be a dead end
The Netty people are using it in SPDY it would be better to keep it if
possible.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
R_SUCCESS;
}
+++
Should I just put or have a flag in configure for it?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 06/15/2015 08:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/06/2015 06:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
The netty-tcnative is based on the 1.1.x so the porting taking more than
excepted.
Are you going to be able to commit this in multiple commits or is it
going to be one big commit?
A big commit it
Hi,
We have empty stubs in tc-native when openssl isn't detected, are those
still needed?
With NIO and NIO2 connectors we don't need native when we aren't using SSL.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
On 06/15/2015 01:32 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/06/2015 12:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
We have empty stubs in tc-native when openssl isn't detected, are those
still needed?
Yes, if we want to be able to support the APR/native connector without
OpenSSL.
With NIO and NIO2 conne
Hi,
We are using SSLSocket.getALPN() but in fact that belongs to SSL
according to the C code, should we move that to SSL and use the
netty-tc-native code there?
SSL.getAlpnSelected() would do the trick,
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 06/15/2015 04:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/06/2015 15:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
We are using SSLSocket.getALPN() but in fact that belongs to SSL
according to the C code, should we move that to SSL and use the
netty-tc-native code there?
I don't understand. ALPN is negot
I am going to merge it today and fix in svn what will be broken after.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 06/18/2015 02:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18 June 2015 13:12:52 BST, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I am going to merge it today and fix in svn what will be broken after.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
ke the latest call tells which
key/cert will be used.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Thanks in advance,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomc
On 06/23/2015 02:11 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2015-06-22 9:06 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
On 06/19/2015 10:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I'm looking at integrating multiple certificate support with APR/native
and the new OpenSSLContext.
I have a query about the following method t
looking like I'm not going to be in a position to do the tc-native
release quickly if one is required.
Should be OK: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
(Affected 1.0.1o, 1.0.1n)
In tc-native log: Use OpenSSL 1.0.1m with Windows binaries. (markt)
Safe :D
Cheers
Jean-Fre
On 07/13/2015 07:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 7/10/15 10:48 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:48:01 2015
New Revision: 1690279
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1690279
Log:
Make sure we don't core the JVM if called wrongly from a destroy
On 07/17/2015 04:03 PM, r...@apache.org wrote:
Find the new better API for ALPN.
Should we remove the old one? Basically it should be use only by tomcat.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
for all the troubles around
CVE-2014-8111.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 09/03/2015 11:16 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Sep 3 09:16:48 2015
New Revision: 1700964
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1700964
Log:
Remove useless code.
Well it reset the pos after the put... I will rollback that might be
used somewhere no?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 09/09/2015 10:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/09/2015 07:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think it is time to tag trunk of native to go forward for native
What tag should I use?
1.2.0 as it still work with the APR connector?
1.2.0 works for me.
I don't think we are finished
related features but without a servlet 4.0 do
we want to do that?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
HTTP/2 seems to be very popular I am +1 making a tomcat 8.1.x or 8.5.x
allowing users to jump in the new technology.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
O2 works as excepted with the same configuration but NIO doesn't use
the CPU available on the box.
Any ideas?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 09/14/2015 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/09/2015 09:16, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted that "sendfile" with the NIO connector doesn't fill the CPU
on a load test I am testing HTTP/1.1 with:
sslImplementationName="org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.O
On 09/14/2015 10:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 09/14/2015 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/09/2015 09:16, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted that "sendfile" with the NIO connector doesn't fill the CPU
on a load test I am testing HTTP/1.1 with:
sslImp
memory I had in
my load tests.
Thanks
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 05/06/2015 12:37 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been about 6 months since the last release, the changelog is
reasonably long so I think it is time for 6.0.44.
I am on it
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_44/
The proposed 6.0.44 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 6.0.44 Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 05/08/2015 04:24 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 6.0.44 Stable
All my tests are OK.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
The following votes were cast:
+1 (binding) : kkolinko, kfujino, jfclere, remm.
+1 (non-binding) : Ognjen Blagojevic
Given the votes above, we have enough votes for the release. I intend to
go ahead with the release.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 4/13/23 10:42, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.74
Tested on fedora 37 with native 1.2.26
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 5/4/23 16:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.75
Tested on fedora 37.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Hi,
The Travis CI build seems to fail on timout regularly should we increase
the timeout? Or investigate the problem?
Smoke Test / JDK8 ubuntu-latest fails on tls3 tests should we make the
test conditional?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 05/08/2020 14:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:22 AM jean-frederic clere <mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
The Travis CI build seems to fail on timout regularly should we
increase
the timeout? Or investigate the problem?
Smoke Te
On 2/14/24 09:53, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.86
Tested on fedora 39 with tc-native 1.3.0.
Reproducible.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
bscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
On 2/14/24 23:43, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.19
Tested on fedora39, build reproduced and TCK passed.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
TCK tests are still running...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 4/16/24 15:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.23
Tested on fedora39 with tc-native 2.0.7 looks OK, TCK passes.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
No idea. You'd need to do a diff to see what didn't match and that will
On 4/23/24 14:44, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples
On 4/23/24 14:47, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples
On 5/3/24 22:37, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.89
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Hi,
I looked to the page, wondering how to get a "new comer" to the cwiki...
That is not documented.
What is the process? Create a Apache JIRA user and user it?
If yes that should be in the wiki ;-)
--
Cheers
Jea
On 08/05/2021 20:14, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.46
Tested on fedora34 looks OK.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
On 08/05/2021 18:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.0.6 (stable)
Tested on fedora34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
On 01/06/2021 11:53, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable, go ahead and release
Tested with fedora34 and tomcat-10.0.6
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
On 10/06/2021 12:19, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.48 (stable)
Tested on fedora 34
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
r return OK where we test
SSL_CVERIFY_OPTIONAL_NO_CA
(https://github.com/apache/tomcat-native/blob/main/native/src/sslutils.c#L337)?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additiona
On 29/06/2021 14:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2021 12:29, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
It seems certificateVerification="optionalNoCA" only works if the OCSP
is disabled.
In
Otherwise the OCSP check forces an error becaus
On 28/06/2021 10:56, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.50 (stable)
Tested on fedora fc34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 26/06/2021 00:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M2 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
On 29/06/2021 18:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2021 15:19, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 29/06/2021 14:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2021 12:29, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
It seems certificateVerification="optionalNoCA" only works if the
OCSP i
Hi,
I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something?
If we need it I will work on it next week ;-)
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something?
If we need it I will work on it next week ;-)
To clarify, you mean checking Tomcat can (and implementing if it can't)
the abili
On 09/07/2021 15:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Ferderic,
On 7/9/21 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something?
If we need it I will work on
On 09/07/2021 18:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
how do you make sure, that your tests actually land in the correct
SSLHost? You are using the same server certificate, so a check on the
client side might not be easy. I would find a test more convincing, if
the three TLS hosts would
On 13/07/2021 11:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 09/07/2021 18:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
how do you make sure, that your tests actually land in the correct
SSLHost? You are using the same server certificate, so a check on the
client side might not be easy. I would find a
On 31/07/2021 06:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.52 (stable)
tested on fedora34 with java8 and adoptium jdk8u302-b08
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 03/08/2021 21:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M4 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
TestSSLHostConfigCompat ones look new, is anyone seeing those?
I was trying with openssl/"master".
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On 10/08/2021 14:02, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.NIO.txt
[concat]
TEST
On 10/08/2021 14:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
вт, 10 авг. 2021 г. в 15:02, jean-frederic clere :
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat] TEST
On 10/08/2021 14:02, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.NIO.txt
[concat]
TEST
-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestClientCertTls13.NIO2.txt
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestCustomSsl.NIO.txt
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestCustomSsl.NIO2.txt
+++
But that looks like a configuration problem... invalid certificate...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 06/09/2021 21:21, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.53 (stable)
Tested on fedora34 with openjdk8.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 9/22/22 11:21, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.66 (stable)
Tested on fedora 36 with tc-native 1.2.35
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 9/23/22 11:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.0 (stable)
Tested on fedora36 with tc-native 2.0.1
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 9/23/22 14:03, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.67 (stable)
Testing on fedora36
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
On 10/7/22 11:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
Based on the above I think EOL for 8.5.x should be either 31 March 2024
+1
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
On 11/2/22 13:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1: Acceptable. Go ahead and release.
Tested on fedora using 9.0.67 examples on 10.1.0 tomcat.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 11/9/22 18:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.2
Tested on fedora 36.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional c
On 12/1/22 15:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.70
Test on fedora36 with tc-native-1.2.35
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 12/8/22 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
Ping. Just a reminder we need one more PMC vote for this release.
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.4
Tested of fedora36
Jean-Frederic
Thanks,
Mark
On 05/12/2022 17:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.4 release is
On 12/8/22 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
Ping. Just a reminder we need one more PMC vote for this release.
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.4
Tested of fedora36
Jean-Frederic
Thanks,
Mark
On 05/12/2022 17:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.4 release is now
On 1/9/23 23:53, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.71
Tested on fedora 37
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
On 1/9/23 21:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.5
Tested on fedora 37.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On 10/9/23 23:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.81
tested with tc-native-1.2.39 on fedora 38
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 10/10/23 00:18, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.14
Tested on fedora 37 openjdk 17 with tc-native-2.0.6
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 11/9/23 23:12, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.83
Tested on fedora38...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e
On 11/9/23 20:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1 Alpha - go ahead and release as 11.0.0-M14
Thanks!
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
601 - 700 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
