vote.
> It will be closed in about 72 hours
> (or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
>
>
> Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is:
>
> [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
Builds/Tests on all plaforms I am able to test.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>
+1 on my side :-)
Cheers
J
On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were
ng SPDY implementation in tomcat,
> inter-operable
> with chrome/mod_spdy/google. If we start with this we'll probably make
> more progress than by discussing protocols :-)
Yep, I have noted that people are preparing an implementation for httpd
so at some point it will just "porting" that code to TC.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
is all that is needed thought.
> Some of those are even displayed on status page
> when it's loaded in inside the Tomcat.
Additionally JAVA6 provide stats information on the JVM.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
enough votes is the fix for
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48627
I have voted for this one.
I will wait a while and then go for the release.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tom
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
On 02/23/2010 04:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
Looks ok in all my builds.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
On 02/25/2010 01:07 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
> So far all looks OK - but due to the version issue - I vote:
> [X] Broken
>
> I believe rebuilding with an updated properties (no retag needed) should
> fix the issue.
Yep it is just a packaging problem.
Cheers
che.org/viewvc?rev=881179&view=rev ?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 03/02/2010 05:47 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 05:43 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
>>> New Revision: 917921
>>>
>>> URL: ht
On 03/02/2010 08:54 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Time for another one folks? Should I tag end of this week?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On 03/04/2010 04:04 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency on it..
There is still a regression to vote (and test): bug 48827.
If no other problems the release should happen early next week.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Thanks
>
>
Hi,
Just that JIRA stuff has been created for the GSoC. Should we move our
entries there?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314021
-
To unsubscribe, e-
related to the actual change proposed here?
Oops that should just fix the examples. Mark already fixed the part that
broke all the application.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
>
>
> -
&g
yDirectory
SEVERE: Erreur lors du d?ploiement du r?pertoire erablex de
l'application web
Throwable occurred: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org.apache.catalina.session.StandardManager (initialization failure)
at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:140)
On 03/05/2010 09:24 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I sent some patches to Jean-Fred about the LocalString_fr.properties.
I have noticed it is in fact fix in trunk but not in tc6.0.x I have
submitted a new proposal. Please double check... It is not my day today :-/
Cheers
Jean
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
Monday.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
>> Monday.
>> Comments?
>
> +1. Do you really mean release on Monday?
hm... Star
On 03/08/2010 09:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sund
On 03/08/2010 12:01 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/3/8 jean-frederic clere :
>> On 03/08/2010 09:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 06/03/201
e manner, RTC has
> worked well for that
That is also what I am thinking, more eyes to spot errors warrants a
more stable tomcat.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional c
On 03/09/2010 04:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/3/9 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> Do not forget to update both
>> version.minor
>> version.suffix
>
> I meant
> version.build
> version.suffix
Yep. I will double check that.
-
T
On 03/09/2010 04:59 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> And to include french translations fixes :)
those are r920841
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.26/
According to the release process, the 6.0.26 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
er mpm.
>
> That was on of the reasons we kill JK2.
> JNI inproc connector simply didn't work.
One of the big problem is that the prefork and worker models may use
several process for the same session and you can't fix a session to a
JVM process... At the end you needed a flat clu
JSPs in production are something we need to handle
> then we could make this dependent on the setting of the development mode.
>
> Thoughts?
Or have an additional switch for that.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Stable [6]
So I will go on with the release process.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
e I was modifying the files in people.apache.org. The download is
also broken and there the permissions are ok.
>
> cd tomcat-6.0-doc
> chmod -R g+w *
> would fix that
Done
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
On 03/11/2010 05:27 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> More important one is to use the web server connectors directly.
> It's not about speed, but about eliminating connector as a
> point of failure.
>
hm You still have to move the data for httpd (in C) to Tomcat (in JAVA)
so you still have a connector, n
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.26 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.24.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache Tomca
The JIRA are needed just for http://tinyurl.com/asfgsoc
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
l
> 0: Filip
>
> RESULT: Passes
>
>> 6. Require some indication in the commit message for code that usually is
>> covered by RTC, that this commit was done using C-T-R rule.
>
> +1: Mladen, Rainer, Bi
Note we have until the Sunday, March 21st to collect that information.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 03/18/2010 05:05 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:00 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>> Note we have until the Sunday, March 21st to collect that information.
>>
>
> I'm always amazed with the fact that each conference
> planner need your prop
On 03/18/2010 05:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:19 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm always amazed with the fact that each conference
>>> planner need your proposals by yesterday.
>>
>> Well they were asking that the 16th,
e org/apache/coyote/spdy (like we
already have the org/apache/coyote/http11 and org/apache/coyote/ajp).
There is already mod_spdy for httpd in
http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/wiki/Design so you can have a look
there to see how a SPDY server should work.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
; mentor in above links.
> I like the 'SPDY connector' idea too...but because it's still draft
> version, will it become a problem to qualify?
No.
> I mean will it get approved when i make a proposal?
>
I hope it will.
Che
On 04/05/2010 06:11 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> next protocol negotiation
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-00.html
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
oken - do not release
> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
> [X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
The APR gives some errors for example Address already in use :8080
on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
Cheers
Jean-
On 04/14/2010 03:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on
On 04/14/2010 04:13 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> The APR gives some errors for example Address already in use:8080
>> on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
>
to work on
java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java ... The missing
code is already in the Bio connector some how it is a kind of copy +
paste + fix.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 04/28/2010 05:14 AM, Karl San Gabriel wrote:
> Is this valid for non-US citizens?
There is a list j...@apache.org for ASF related jobs, please use that
one for this topic.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
out the contents once upgraded). So
adding upgrade to AJP won't help much.
Additionally I think websockets via upgrade is dead, there won't be new
developments there.
I would just let AJP dying in peace.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
demo from the ApacheCon now the status of
http/2 is:
FF : apr OK, nio NOTOK and nio2 NOTOK.
Chrome: apr OK nio OK and nio2 NOTOK (chrome still gives an error with
nio2, something like a timeout).
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
list.
Cool but note it requires a quite new openssl I would like to see how it
can work without APR.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
opportunity to test
>> the tcnative binaries) and I see what looks to be the same problem with
>> Chrome + NIO2 in that no images are displayed. Even a simple HTTP/2 page
>> fails.
>>
>
> That's what I get. Nice test since I had never tried the OpenSSL engin
.
Cool. My demo is now working for all connectors.
>
> I have put in a work-around but I'm not sure it is in the right place.
> This feels like something that should be fixed at a lower level
> (tcnative?) so a call to unwrap unwarps as much as possible.
Well the
The Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 is
> [X] Stable, go ahead and release
We need to get more people using it ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 10/22/2015 12:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> how do folks feel about dropping the Itanium build from
> the binary packages for tcnative 1.2.x and Tomcat 9.0.x?
DROP IT!!!
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 10/28/2015 11:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
Basically there are so few fixes in 6.0.x that the RTC blocks any move
in 6.0.x
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.60-14.b27.fc22.x86_64
--with-ssl=$HOME/OPENSSL-1.0.2c
make clean
make
Well I tested the tag as I am rebuild always from svn repo.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Regards
>
> 2015-10-28 3:33 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> The following votes were
he day.
I am trying some small changes to allow to use the keystore with the
openssl engine, I need a few days more, do you want to wait or should we
add that later.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Mark
>
> -
> T
threw
exception
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService setContainer
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.IntrospectionUtils.callMethod1(IntrospectionUtils.java:360)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.SetNextRule.end(SetNextRule.java:145)
+++
Cheers
Jean-Fr
On 11/22/2015 01:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22 November 2015 10:40:07 GMT+00:00, jean-frederic clere
> wrote:
>> On 11/20/2015 09:28 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> -public void setContainer(Container container) {
>>> -setContainer((Engine) con
On 11/22/2015 05:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I've fixed the digester rules in trunk so you shouldn't need your patch
> any more.
Thanks
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.or
ill fix the code later today.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 11/23/2015 03:35 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-11-23 15:31 GMT+01:00 jean-frederic clere :
>
>> On 11/23/2015 01:56 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> TW, a changelog, documentation =?
>>
>> Here I have a small question. In fact it possible to mix ope
On 12/22/2015 10:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> It has been over 6 months since the last 6.0.x release. The changelog
> for 6.0.x is reasonably long so it is looks like time for a release.
>
> Jean-Frederic or I have done the last few releases. Are there any
> volun
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.2.17 stable.
The key features of this release are:
- Windows binaries built with APR 1.6.3 and OpenSSL 1.0.2o.
- Fix Certificate verification using CRL.
- Arrange OCSP response processing.
Note that users shoul
CVE-2018-8019 Apache Tomcat Native Connector - Mishandled OCSP invalid response
Severity: Moderate
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.23 to 1.1.34
Description:
When using an OCSP responder Tomcat Native did not
CVE-2018-8020 Apache Tomcat Native Connector - Mishandled OCSP responses can
allow clients to authenticate with revoked certificates
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.23 to 1.1.34
Descript
CVE-2018-1336 Apache Tomcat - Denial of Service
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M9 to 9.0.7
Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.30
Apache Tomcat 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.51
Apache Tomcat 7.0.28 to 7.0.86
Description:
An improper handing of overf
CVE-2018-8037 Apache Tomcat - Information Disclosure
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M9 to 9.0.9
Apache Tomcat 8.5.5 to 8.5.31
Description:
A bug in the tracking of connection closures can lead to
reuse of user sessions in a new
CVE-2018-8034 Apache Tomcat - Security Constraint Bypass
Severity: Low
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9
Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.31
Apache Tomcat 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.52
Apache Tomcat 7.0.35 to 7.0.88
Description:
The host name verification
Hi,
I have a question about using those snapshots: How are they produced?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 06/08/18 16:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/08/18 15:26, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question about using those snapshots: How are they produced?
>
> The buidlbot jobs that run after every commit generate and upload them.
> It is only configu
Hi,
I just want to ask what is the process, we pick all changes after
commons-dbcp releases a version, or could I pick the actual code?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 07/08/18 10:10, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/08/18 08:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just want to ask what is the process, we pick all changes after
>> commons-dbcp releases a version, or could I pick the actual code?
>
> Generally, I keep an e
Hi,
I have problems while building trunk:
/home/jfclere/TMP/tomcat/build.xml:693: javac doesn't support the
"release" attribute
Is that expected I have tried java11 and java8 (openjdk)?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
Hi,
I am working on a jar to laod the libraries in tomcat-native. I have
noted that the examples don't compile and that the test directory is
empty. I am planning to clean that and go for maven build for the new jar.
Comments?
--
Cheers
Jean-Fre
On 03/09/18 12:31, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 03.09.2018 um 11:41 schrieb Mark Thomas:
>> On 03/09/18 09:38, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am working on a jar to laod the libraries in tomcat-native. I have
>>> noted that the examples
On 05/09/18 00:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.12
Tested on fedora 28.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 03/18/2016 03:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/03/2016 14:44, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/17/2016 09:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> [x] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.0
>>
>> I have failure in the following tests:
as openssl might not have the cipher we have in JSSE and I
don't think that should be considered as an issue. I need to have a
closer look but the results seem to depend on openssl version.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubs
SSL
> example/apps code and it could well be, that we should replace a bigger
> part of that code with some pre-cooked cert validation function (call)
> in OpenSSL.
Is mod_ssl also affected by those API changes?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
unning configured as:
+++
+++
thanks
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
be security supported at least until the Debian 9
>>> release (~April/May 2017) it would allow users following the stable
>>> distribution to remain on a supported version of Tomcat (Debian 9 will
>>> include Tomcat 8.5).
>>
>> That is unlikely unless someone
at
> point
> - security fixes will probably be back-ported
> - further releases will depend on circumstances but are unlikely to be
> more frequent that 6 monthly
+1 I will try to find the cycles to be the RM from September on
huge difference in latest tests between the native connector and
the NIO/NIO2 with openssl basically APR looked to have a problem with
tomcat 8.5.x I didn't had to investigate.
I am planning to redo tests soon... And put my slides online :D
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
>>
>> If the
quite where
I excepted it.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
ease artefacts can be found at [1],
> and the build was done using tag [2].
>
> The Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.8 is
> [X] Stable, go ahead and release
According to my tests there is an improvement with the apr connector
(See http://www.slideshare.net/jfclere/n
, I complained and got a patch.
I never had a real hardware accelerator to try so I can't tell, we have
customers using hardware accelerators but that is through tomcat-native
and openssl.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I will try to tag and propose taglibs-standard-1.2.6 for release
tomorrow, any comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Hi,
Anyone knows we have a git mirror of the taglibs? What would be the
process to get it? Ticket to infra?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
hat makes sense since the ApacheCon I have done 2 JUGs on tomcat-8.5,
got a bunch of questions and requests to do more of the same.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> I've started a discussion on the users list.
>
> All help, support, ideas etc. welc
ion at TomcatCon:
>
> [ X ] Yes
> [ ] Maybe
> [ ] No
>
> If you have an idea / some ideas about potential session topics please
> feel free to suggest them. The ideas so far are summarized on the wiki
> [1]. Both new suggestions and amendments to existing ideas
On 01/06/2016 01:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/01/2016 15:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Version 1.2.4 includes the following change:
>>
>> - Renegotiation improvements
>>
>> The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
>> and the build was done using tag [2].
>>
>> The Apache Tomcat Native 1
t across from 1.2.3 if
> people think it is essential.
It is probably better to have it as building on windows is a challenge
for a lot of people.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
Any objections?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 01/08/2016 11:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2016 14:21, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> I'm working on some session stuff that really should
On 01/08/2016 07:27 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2016-01-08 17:21 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
>
> 1) A bug in a new feature:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Hi,
I would like to drop Itanium support in the windows binaries, we have
dropped it in native 1.1.34 so we can't have a complete Itanium in
Tomcat 6.0.45.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On 01/11/2016 03:10 PM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> Jean,
> trying to move to CMake for making portable?
That might be something to look at my previous tries with CMake weren't
successful but feel free to contribute.
Cheers
Je
; So I think we don't *need* a new tcnative. More eyes/thoughts welcome.
>
> Having reviewed the OpenSSL announcement and the tomcta-native code, I
> agree with your assessment.
So I will process with the tomcat6 release process during the week-end
to get a release during next wee
Hi,
I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
Mark has fixed his session stuff and the openssl we use isn't affected
with the latest vulnerability.
Any objections?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubs
On 01/31/2016 07:47 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2016-01-30 15:54 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2016-01-29 18:50 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
>>>
>>> M
/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_45/
The proposed 6.0.45 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 6.0.45 Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
501 - 600 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
