I have a question regarding session invalidation in the target context
of a RequestDispatcher.include().
Some background info: The current impl of package
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationHttpRequest.getSession() creates a
session in the target context of a RD.include() as follows:
- Checks if
validated as well, because the session in the origin context and the
sessions in the target (portlet) contexts all share the same id.
With Option 2, neither the session in the origin context nor the
sessions in any of the other portlets would be affected.
Jan
>
> Yoav
>
> --- Jan
Hi Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote On 11/24/05 11:34,:
> All,
>
> I have been looking at bug 13040 and reviewing the current
> getContext() implementation. I saw Remy's comment from some time ago
> when fixing some related bugs
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=106008981803343&w=2)
> t
Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote On 11/29/05 12:46,:
> Jan,
>
> Jan Luehe wrote:
>
>>Hi Mark,
>
>
>
>>I agree the current javadocs of ServletContext.getContext() are
>>ambiguous, and I agree we need to present this case to the
>>Servlet EG. Maybe there is
x27;ll give people a little longer in case they want to add to this
> discussion and then I'll commit them.
Sounds good!
Thanks, Mark!
Jan
>
> Mark
>
> Jan Luehe wrote:
>
>>I've rewritten the javadocs of getContext(), as follows:
>>
>>/**
>
Consider the following code snippet of a servlet's service() method:
public class DispatcherServlet extends HttpServlet {
public void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res)
throws IOException, ServletException {
request.getRequestDispatcher("/target").forwar
Bill Barker wrote On 01/19/06 18:11,:
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-----
>>From: Jan Luehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:57 PM
>>To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
>>Subject: Response not flushed before RD.forward() r
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:08:30 +0100
> From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Jan Luehe wrote:
>
>>Bill Barker wrote On 01/19/06 18:11,:
>>
>>
Bill Barker wrote On 01/21/06 17:45,:
> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Bill Barker wrote:
>>
>>>Yeah, it's pretty much a fatal flaw in the Catalina design. It's
>>>currently impossible for Catalina to satisfy both the requirements for
>>>er
Bill Barker wrote On 02/02/06 11:32,:
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:02 AM
>>To: Tomcat Developers List
>>Subject: Re: svn commit: r371765 -
>>/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/c
Bill Barker wrote On 05/04/06 11:14,:
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:45 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r399545 -
/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
[EMAI
Bill Barker wrote On 05/04/06 17:18,:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r399545 -
/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
Hi Mike,
thanks for your comments, which I have recorded at:
https://servlet-spec-eg.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40
and
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2212
I agree with all the problems you've pointed out, and I agree they need
to be fixed.
I think we've inhe
Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote On 01/24/07 07:59 PM,:
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hi Mike,
thanks for your comments, which I have recorded at:
https://servlet-spec-eg.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Jan - is it possible to get read access to this?
please go to https://servlet-spec
Hi Mike,
> I think there's a bug in javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet, but I'm not
sure where to report it.
> I'm posting this here for the time being (and possibly on the
Glassfish "issue tracker" if and
> when I can jump through the hoops required to do so), but please let
me know if it ought t
Hi Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote On 01/25/07 04:33 PM,:
Jan Luehe wrote:
> please go to https://servlet-spec-eg.dev.java.net/ and request
> observer role.
I tried by I can't access any of the project. My id is medthomas.
Could you forward the request for me?
I'm forwarding th
Hi Bob,
Bob Damato wrote On 06/13/06 07:49,:
Hello, I got no response for this on the tomcat-users list. I think it may be
more appropriate for this list since it's more about the internals of Tomcat:
--
I have a page that renders a very large report using
Hi Dies,
Dies Koper wrote On 08/16/06 05:28,:
>Hello,
>
>I'm looking into an issue we ran into when upgrading from Tomcat 4.1 to
>Tomcat 5.5.
>
>The time returned by the HttpSession.getLastAccessTime method seems to
>have changed.
>We believe it should return the time of the previous request from
but could not find any
discussion about it.
Thank again for the reply,
Dies
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hi Dies,
Dies Koper wrote On 08/16/06 05:28,:
Hello,
I'm looking into an issue we ran into when upgrading from Tomcat 4.1 to
Tomcat 5.5.
The time returned by the HttpSession.getLastAccess
Mark Thomas wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
And if the TCK signature tests pass - that's a bug in the tests :-).
We shouldn't touch the method signatures in servlet API.
Having read everyone's comments and having thought some more about
this during today, my current plan is:
- fix any non-
20 matches
Mail list logo
