Re: [PR] [fix] service.bat JvmOptions9 - FollowUp on Improve CVE-2024-56337 protection [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
mhoffrog commented on code in PR #858: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/858#discussion_r2099684597 ## bin/catalina.bat: ## @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ if not "%LOGGING_MANAGER%" == "" goto noJuliManager set LOGGING_MANAGER=-Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoa

Re: [PR] [fix] service.bat JvmOptions9 - FollowUp on Improve CVE-2024-56337 protection [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
michael-o commented on code in PR #858: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/858#discussion_r2099821491 ## bin/catalina.bat: ## @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ if not "%LOGGING_MANAGER%" == "" goto noJuliManager set LOGGING_MANAGER=-Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLo

Re: [PR] [fix] service.bat JvmOptions9 - FollowUp on Improve CVE-2024-56337 protection [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
mhoffrog commented on code in PR #858: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/858#discussion_r2099778013 ## bin/catalina.bat: ## @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ if not "%LOGGING_MANAGER%" == "" goto noJuliManager set LOGGING_MANAGER=-Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoa

Re: [PR] [fix] ensure that when acceptor is stopped it doesn't log an error for nothing [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
rmannibucau commented on PR #857: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/857#issuecomment-2897398231 > Apart from exceptional circumstances, Tomcat does not attempt to work around bugs in other components or OS configuration issues. This is a design decision to avoid bloat. well

Re: [PR] [fix] ensure that when acceptor is stopped it doesn't log an error for nothing [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
rmannibucau commented on PR #857: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/857#issuecomment-2896993852 @markt-asf you nailed it, after way deeper investigation I realized ipv6 was bound but only ipv4 (all) were working. It led me to checking some conf os. gai.conf was plain default so not

Re: [PR] [fix] service.bat JvmOptions9 - FollowUp on Improve CVE-2024-56337 protection [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
michael-o commented on code in PR #858: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/858#discussion_r2099737527 ## bin/catalina.bat: ## @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ if not "%LOGGING_MANAGER%" == "" goto noJuliManager set LOGGING_MANAGER=-Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLo

Re: [PR] [fix] service.bat JvmOptions9 - FollowUp on Improve CVE-2024-56337 protection [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
mhoffrog commented on code in PR #858: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/858#discussion_r2099932516 ## bin/catalina.bat: ## @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ if not "%LOGGING_MANAGER%" == "" goto noJuliManager set LOGGING_MANAGER=-Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoa

[PR] Acceptor & Poller Thread should print error logs when it crashes now [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
jmilktea opened a new pull request, #859: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/859 As the title says, this is to facilitate troubleshooting -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

Buildbot success in on tomcat-11.0.x

2025-05-21 Thread buildbot
Build status: Build succeeded! Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1675 Blamelist: Mark Thomas , remm Build Text: build successful Status Detected: restored build Build Source Stamp: [branch 11.0.x] 6df278778400ea926f2aeb6050feaa83d1b1ab98 Steps: wo

Re: [PR] Acceptor & Poller Thread should print error logs when it crashes now [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
rmaucher closed pull request #859: Acceptor & Poller Thread should print error logs when it crashes now URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/859 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [PR] Acceptor & Poller Thread should print error logs when it crashes now [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
rmaucher commented on PR #859: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/859#issuecomment-2900085331 I don't understand what this tries to do. If ExceptionUtils.handleThrowable rethrows a fatal error, you will notice it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To res

(tomcat) branch main updated: Align with 10.1.x

2025-05-21 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new b5be6b6363 Align with 10.1.x b5be6b6363 is described

[Bug 69690] allowsto plug in some ProgressListener on multipart file upload processing

2025-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690 --- Comment #4 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro --- Ok. I saw commit... Many thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe,

(tomcat) branch 11.0.x updated: Fix BZ 69690 - getParameter is OK for multipart request and no config

2025-05-21 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push: new d36bd03ed7 Fix BZ 69690 - getParameter is OK for

(tomcat) branch main updated: Fix BZ 69690 - getParameter is OK for multipart request and no config

2025-05-21 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new d42dd73a2e Fix BZ 69690 - getParameter is OK for mult

(tomcat) branch 11.0.x updated: Align with 10.1.x

2025-05-21 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push: new 6df2787784 Align with 10.1.x 6df2787784 is descri

(tomcat) branch 10.1.x updated: Align with 11.0.x / 12.0.x

2025-05-21 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new f99256af68 Align with 11.0.x / 12.0.x f99256af68

Re: [PR] allow users to plug in a ProgressListener via some factory. [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf commented on PR #856: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/856#issuecomment-2898190448 Fixed for 11.0.8 onwards. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comme

(tomcat) branch 9.0.x updated: Align with 11.0.x / 12.0.x

2025-05-21 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new cf30ae6818 Align with 11.0.x / 12.0.x cf30ae6818 is

[Bug 69690] allowsto plug in some ProgressListener on multipart file upload processing

2025-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [PR] allow users to plug in a ProgressListener via some factory. [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf closed pull request #856: allow users to plug in a ProgressListener via some factory. URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/856 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spe

[Bug 69690] allowsto plug in some ProgressListener on multipart file upload processing

2025-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690 --- Comment #3 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro --- Hi How was this fixed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PR] allow users to plug in a ProgressListener via some factory. [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
reiern70 commented on PR #856: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/856#issuecomment-2898290558 > Fixed for 11.0.8 onwards. Saw the commit. Many thanks. Thus now applications can work as before. I will test our application + Latest wicket 10.x against unreleased tomcat and conf

Re: [PR] allow users to plug in a ProgressListener via some factory. [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
reiern70 commented on PR #856: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/856#issuecomment-2898611254 > > Fixed for 11.0.8 onwards. > > Saw the commit. Many thanks. Thus now applications can work as before. I will test our application + Latest wicket 10.x against unreleased tomcat and

OpenSSL 3.5

2025-05-21 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, FYI I just ran all the unit tests for Tomcat 11 on my aarm64 Mac against tcnative and OpenSSL 3.5 and I saw nothing out of the ordinary. I had previously been testing using OpenSSL 3.4.1 and I know that 3.5 is a big change, so I figured I'd report my experience here. -chris -

Re: [PR] [fix] ensure that when acceptor is stopped it doesn't log an error for nothing [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf commented on PR #857: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/857#issuecomment-2897627585 Looks like an OS issue (or more likely a network driver issue) since `ifconfig` is reporting IPv6 addresses for a network adaptor when IPv6 is disabled. I don't see that on my Ubuntu 25.04

Re: [PR] [fix] ensure that when acceptor is stopped it doesn't log an error for nothing [tomcat]

2025-05-21 Thread via GitHub
rmannibucau commented on PR #857: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/857#issuecomment-2897864027 @markt-asf not really, the issue is really on tomcat side and its any handling at a time which is decoralated from the binding time. If using a specific interface there is no issue but w

Buildbot failure in on tomcat-9.0.x

2025-05-21 Thread buildbot
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven snapshot repository (failure) Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/37/builds/1411 Blamelist: Mark Thomas Build Text: failed Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven snapshot repository (failure) Status Detecte