https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69137
Bug ID: 69137
Summary: https://paryasfoundation.com/nasha-mukti-kendra-in-cha
ndigarh/
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Window
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69137
--- Comment #1 from paryasfoundation ---
Created attachment 39775
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39775&action=edit
Nasha Mukti Kendras in Chandigarh play a crucial role in combating substance
abuse and addiction in the r
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:19 PM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.25 release is now available for
> voting.
>
> All committers and PMC members are kindly requested to provide a vote if
> possible. ANY TOMCAT USER MAY VOTE, though only PMC members votes are
> binding.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:06 PM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.90 release is now available for voting.
>
> The notable changes compared to 9.0.89 are:
>
> - Ensure that static resources deployed via a JAR file remain accessible
>when the context is configured to use a
On 14/06/2024 22:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Please reply with a +1 for release or +0/-0/-1 with an explanation.
+1
Unit tests pass on Linux, Windows, MacOS M1 and MacOS Intel.
Build is reproducible.
Mark
-
To unsubscrib
On 14/06/2024 18:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/06/2024 16:06, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The proposed 9.0.90 release is:
[ ] -1, Broken - do not release
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.90
Tests pass on Linux, Windows, MacOS Intel and MacOS M1 with one caveat.
Update: Build is reprodu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69138
Bug ID: 69138
Summary: http://pmegploan.org.in
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 2.0.6
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69138
--- Comment #1 from lokesh ---
Created attachment 39776
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39776&action=edit
http://pmegploan.org.in
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69135
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
My reading of the JSP specification is that both examples are currently not
specification compliant.
The references are a little circular but the key ones seem to be:
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/pages
Igal,
On 6/14/24 18:05, Igal Sapir wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 2:19 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.25 release is now available for
voting.
All committers and PMC members are kindly requested to provide a vote if
possible. ANY T
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/706#issuecomment-2173636514
> > The constructor captures its arguments and then ignores them forever
after that. Why bother capturing them in the first place?
>
> Well actually it is using the KeyManag
Hakky54 commented on PR #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/706#issuecomment-2173747924
The wrapper class is package protected, so no one can access it. It can only
be created using the sslutil which returns the interface. I am not sure whether
sslutil is the right place and w
All,
On 6/14/24 5:19 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.25 release is now available for
voting.
All committers and PMC members are kindly requested to provide a vote if
possible. ANY TOMCAT USER MAY VOTE, though only PMC members votes are
binding. We welcome non-co
13 matches
Mail list logo
