CloudWise-Lukemiao opened a new pull request, #701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/701
Code optimization removed the null eval statement code if os400 is true in
the script
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
rmaucher commented on PR #702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/702#issuecomment-1968755182
I think FilterDef getAsyncSupported can be optimized. But I'm not super
convinced by the rest. Where is the inflection point ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
markt-asf closed pull request #700: Attempt to protect against asynchronous
thread safety violations
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
markt-asf commented on PR #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1969192558
I'm closing this as I have come up with a better plan that makes slightly
better uses of the existing facades to trigger some NPEs when this happens.
--
This is an automated message from
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 835e1be32a Performance tweaks for filter chain
835e1be
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 55ff302cfb Performance tweaks for filter chain
55f
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 6c55aab511 Performance tweaks for filter chain
6c55a
rmaucher commented on PR #702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/702#issuecomment-1969224578
I added some optimizations, still based on the array. If you investigate
something, then fully using a LinkedHashSet would likely be better than HashSet
+ array. Please provide actual micro
rmaucher closed pull request #702: Avoid performance issues that may arise when
the array is large.
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/702
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
> diff --git a/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/FilterDef.java
> b/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/FilterDef.java
> index 3a208964e0..b742d5c19c 100644
> --- a/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/FilterDef.java
> +++ b/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/FilterDe
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 5:10 PM Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/FilterDef.java
> > b/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/FilterDef.java
> > index 3a208964e0..b742d5c19c 100644
> > --- a/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/web/Filte
Build status: BUILD FAILED: Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven snapshot repository
(failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/37/builds/875
Blamelist: remm
Build Text: Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven snapshot repository (failure)
Status Detected: new failure
Build S
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
The typical way to do this is:
1. Remove all inbound HTTP headers you want to set at the proxy
2. Set your specific HTTP headers at the proxy
3. Read your now-trusted HTTP headers from the request in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #5 from dub...@gmail.com ---
Again - I need something integrated w/ Tomcat and a true reverse proxy over
HTTP will never be that. How would things like REMOTE_USER or the client
certificate get propagated to Tomcat? This is somethi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to dub357 from comment #5)
> How would things like REMOTE_USER or the client
> certificate get propagated to Tomcat? This is something your presentation
> fails to discuss and is arguably t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #7 from dub...@gmail.com ---
Im stuck with IIS, hence the request for a mod to the isapi filter connector.
If I could use Apache, I would be able to use the JkEnvVar directive.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
dub...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving th
All,
When using AJP, setting tomcatAuthentication="false" allows mod_jk or
mod_proxy_ajp to transmit authenticated user information across the
connection to Tomcat so that request.getRemoteUser() will return
whatever httpd has for REMOTE_USER.
The same is not true for the HTTP connectors.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
I've proposed making arrangements for REMOTE_USER on the dev list. I realize
that's not quite what you are asking for, here, but I thought I'd mention it
since I really do think we as a community shou
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz ---
Back to your original request...
Could you set HTTP headers (to proxy either using AJP or HTTP) and then have
your application pick those up using a Filter? Something like:
Client -- HTTP --> IIS
II
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
--- Comment #10 from dub...@gmail.com ---
First off, what I'm asking for already exists in mod_jk via the JkEnvVar
directive. I just want the same thing for jk_isapi_plugin (the IIS equivalent
of mod_jk).
This request stemmed from a deep dive
RealTake opened a new pull request, #703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/703
Hello I was checking the code regarding the "Content-length" of the response
and found it.
In my opinion, it is because I decided that it is unnecessary to double
check !coyoteResponse.isCommitted()
22 matches
Mail list logo