rmaucher commented on PR #598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/598#issuecomment-1465711314
The thing to look for is to not add any dependencies to the bootstrap, but
it looks ok here (I think).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/596#issuecomment-1466223964
> I have a question that why we don't add a real **primary
key**(auto-increment) to solve the problem that primary key constraint
violation when insert data to database simultaneo
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/596#issuecomment-1466230691
> I would love to see an interface that goes a step further and allows for
NoSQL implementations as well. For example, Redis is an excellent option for a
data store IMO.
Th
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/596#issuecomment-1466235515
> Punt the session update operation to a callback or interface, have one or
two sensible defaults (like for the major databases and specific table
configuration) and have a way fo
isapir commented on PR #596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/596#issuecomment-1466395493
> This does bring up a good point: rather than having a new configuration
option, I could simply have a subclass of DataSourceStore which overrides the
store method to do the SELECT...FOR UPD
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66196
--- Comment #11 from gabriel.holl...@appian.com ---
Looking over the thread here, it sounded like the path forward was to log, and
potentially drop the header for Http1.1
However that same change wasnt done for the AJP Processor, causing invali
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66196
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66524
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Steven Kearns from comment #2)
> The field CachedResource.nextCheck is what is being sorted, it is also a
> proxy for lastUsedTime.
Yup. I got the reversal reversed in my head when readi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66524
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
+1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
F
