This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 0940c56 Fix backport for Java 7
0940c56 is describ
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #2 from Patrick ---
Thank you for quick reply! Yes, familiar with RFC and just spent a few days
tracking this down. I understand where you guys are coming from. Suggestions
for improvement because I would hate someone else to have
Greetings!
JDK 18 has been released (General Availability) on March 22nd as
planned, the release cadence is working like clockwork! As a small token
of gratitude, some of you have been specifically acknowledged in the
"The Arrival of Java 18" announcement [1]. On behalf of the entire team,
le
All,
Did the Apache Tomcat project ever officially announce an EOL date for
Tomcat 5.0 and 4.x? Or for 3.x for that matter?
I was looking at the Wikipedia page for Tomcat and they didn't have EOL
dates for anything before 6.0, so I filled-in the date for 5.5 but I
can't find older EOL announ
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Schultz ---
Wireshark
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tom
David,
On 3/26/22 14:13, David Blevins wrote:
I've never had the bravery to ask
Why the heck not?
but would there be some willingness to consider adding a mention of
TomEE on the Tomcat website?
I'm up for it. I can't imagine anyone on the Tomcat PMC would have any
problem with this. Anyon
пн, 28 мар. 2022 г. в 19:36, Christopher Schultz :
>
> All,
>
> Did the Apache Tomcat project ever officially announce an EOL date for
> Tomcat 5.0 and 4.x? Or for 3.x for that matter?
>
> I was looking at the Wikipedia page for Tomcat and they didn't have EOL
> dates for anything before 6.0, so I
If nobody else does, I dub thee
"The Librarian"!!!
Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
Jon McAlexander
Infrastructure Engineer
Asst Vice President
He/His
Middleware Product Engineering
Enterprise CIO | EAS | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions
8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
MAC: F44
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #14 from Martin Stangl ---
Created attachment 38233
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38233&action=edit
Wireshark capture of authentication with Let's Encrypt OSCP certificate
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #15 from Martin Stangl ---
Created attachment 38234
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38234&action=edit
Wireshark capture of authentication with Active Directory issued certificate
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #16 from Martin Stangl ---
Created attachment 38235
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38235&action=edit
Wireshark capture of authentication with Self Signed certificate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #17 from Martin Stangl ---
Hi Christopher,
I captured the traffic from when the client certificate is submitted to the
server until the authentication completed. So basically the full 60 seconds of
delay.
Wireshark could not captu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Patrick from comment #2)
> Thank you for quick reply! Yes, familiar with RFC and just spent a few days
> tracking this down. I understand where you guys are coming from. Suggestions
> fo
David,
On 3/28/22 08:13, David Delabassee wrote:
JDK 18 has been released (General Availability) on March 22nd as
>
> [...]
>
- JEP 408: Simple Web Server
Let's hope it no longer has that crippling memory leak from the "good
old" (aka not-good) com.sun.net.httpserver simple web server.
/s
Jon,
On 3/28/22 16:24, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
If nobody else does, I dub thee
"The Librarian"!!!
Stack Overflow rewards this kind of work with a badge called "Necromancer".
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 3:10 P
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #18 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Martin Stangl from comment #17)
> I captured the traffic from when the client certificate is submitted to the
> server until the authentication completed. So basically the full 60 second
Chris,
Yeah, but, this is Tomcat, not Stack Overflow. :-)
Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
Jon McAlexander
Infrastructure Engineer
Asst Vice President
He/His
Middleware Product Engineering
Enterprise CIO | EAS | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions
8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
MA
вт, 29 мар. 2022 г. в 00:47, Christopher Schultz :
>
> Jon,
>
> On 3/28/22 16:24, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> > If nobody else does, I dub thee
> >
> > "The Librarian"!!!
>
> Stack Overflow rewards this kind of work with a badge called "Necromancer".
I happen to have 3 of those,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #19 from Martin Stangl ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #18)
> I think you misunderstood what I was suggesting: using Wireshark to monitor
> *outbound* traffic during your testing.
This is exactly what I captured.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #20 from Martin Stangl ---
I verified that the 6 milliseconds delay are the timeout configured by the
connectionTimeout parameter of the connector.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
20 matches
Mail list logo
