https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65773
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
*** Bug 65773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65755
--- Comment #2 from dimitrios.psymar...@atos.net ---
Hi,
We have already checked if there are any possible "leaked" references to the
request/response/session objects outside of their normal scope, but this
doesn't seem to be the case.
Just to
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 10:07 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 01/01/2022 20:05, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 8:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Probably questions for Rémy but any input welcome.
> >>
> >> I'm looking at SpotBugs and it has a few warning for thi
4 Jan 2022 13:03:57 Rémy Maucherat :
Thanks for the sync improvements.
As for the problematic scenarios, sequences like create/remove/create
seem confusing when reading the code but do work.
Agreed. I think I was getting confused by the possible ways to break it
with concurrent requests.
Thanks for the additional trace. That looks like a different issue. This
is next on my TODO list so hopefully I'll have something for you to test
later today.
Mark
On 03/01/2022 19:11, Rainer Jung wrote:
Unfortunately I can still reproduce a deadlock on 8.5. I saw the non-8.5
update a few min
On 03/01/2022 21:19, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 12:32 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
Sort of related, I am wondering about the build environment. We have
seen an issue with downstream building with Java 11 and there are
difficulties building 8.5.x particularly with a clean install
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:09 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2022 21:19, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 12:32 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Sort of related, I am wondering about the build environment. We have
> >> seen an issue with downstream building with Java 11 and the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 1b2d056 Fix potential deadlock with concurrent new
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 39e4c4e Fix potential deadlock with concurrent new
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push:
new d77177d Fix potential deadlock with concurrent n
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new aa48dd9 Fix potential deadlock with concurrent new f
Hi Rainer,
I think I have this additional issue fixed. If you could test and let me
know how you get on that would be great.
Thanks,
Mark
On 04/01/2022 13:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the additional trace. That looks like a different issue. This
is next on my TODO list so hopefully I'
Hi Mark,
Am 04.01.2022 um 16:29 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi Rainer,
I think I have this additional issue fixed. If you could test and let me
know how you get on that would be great.
Great! LGTM, more than 200 iterations without deadlock. Before it neded
about 3-10 iterations.
Thanks a bunch,
squarewav opened a new issue #24:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-jakartaee-migration/issues/24
Can you provide a statement in the README.md that describes the changes made
by this tool?
It is customary for software EULAs to include language like the following:
`5. You m
ebourg commented on issue #24:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat-jakartaee-migration/issues/24#issuecomment-1005121746
> Can it be said that the only changes this tool makes are to package names?
Yes
> Does it change method signatures, parameter types
Yes and yes, i
17 matches
Mail list logo