https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65780
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Remy Mau
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for finding this. It isn't something I have seen in my testing. I
think this is something that needs to be fixed before the January set of
releases.
From the stack trace, it looks like the root cause is locks being
obtained in an inconsistent order - a classic deadlock.
I
It seems JDT 4.22 contains Java 11 compiled classes:
compile:
...
[javac]
/shared/build/dev/tomcat/git/10.0.x/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JDTCompiler.java:40:
error: cannot access IProblem
[javac] import org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.IProblem;
[javac]
For reference: this is probably the ticket about moving JDT (and ECJ) to
Java 11:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=572389
And this is the parallel mail discussion:
https://www.eclipse.org/lists/eclipse-dev/msg11703.html
If we roll back the change for TC 10.0 and 9, there is also
On 03/01/2022 09:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for finding this. It isn't something I have seen in my testing. I
think this is something that needs to be fixed before the January set of
releases.
From the stack trace, it looks like the root cause is locks being
obtained in an in
Thanks Marc.
In the meantime, I can also say, that it happens for TC 8.5 using JSSE
or OpenSSL and NIO or NIO2. I did not try APR.
Unfortunately I can still reproduce on TC 8.5 even without the sync
patch you mentioned below. The code curretly under test has:
diff --git a/java/org/apache/co
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a change to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
from d039b4c Version updates
new 37cc27f Revert ECJ update as 4.22 requires Java 11.
new 9e3fc44 Fix Java 17 c
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 9e3fc447ab73303c1b65dfc7f11e8e2f76956441
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 3 11:18:47 2022 +
Fix Java 17 c
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 37cc27f1e8ceaeb298f07cc20722a99f5dd58a81
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 3 11:11:53 2022 +
Revert ECJ up
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:53 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> For reference: this is probably the ticket about moving JDT (and ECJ) to
> Java 11:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=572389
>
> And this is the parallel mail discussion:
>
> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/eclipse-dev/msg11703.h
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a change to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
from 4da1ceb Version updates
new 0017e33 Revert ECJ update as 4.22 requires Java 11.
new ea57ae9 Fix Java 17 co
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit ea57ae94edfd12319a4bf8f88d38bb0f469a7d07
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 3 11:23:34 2022 +
Fix Java 17 co
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 0017e3331636773418083a98767a7259e22394a0
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 3 11:20:52 2022 +
Revert ECJ upd
On 03/01/2022 11:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:53 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
For reference: this is probably the ticket about moving JDT (and ECJ) to
Java 11:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=572389
And this is the parallel mail discussion:
https://www.eclipse.
On 03/01/2022 11:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks Marc.
In the meantime, I can also say, that it happens for TC 8.5 using JSSE
or OpenSSL and NIO or NIO2. I did not try APR.
Unfortunately I can still reproduce on TC 8.5 even without the sync
patch you mentioned below.
Drat. Can you post the s
Am 03.01.2022 um 12:33 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 03/01/2022 11:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks Marc.
In the meantime, I can also say, that it happens for TC 8.5 using JSSE
or OpenSSL and NIO or NIO2. I did not try APR.
Unfortunately I can still reproduce on TC 8.5 even without the sync
patch
On 03/01/2022 13:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 03.01.2022 um 12:33 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 03/01/2022 11:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks Marc.
In the meantime, I can also say, that it happens for TC 8.5 using
JSSE or OpenSSL and NIO or NIO2. I did not try APR.
Unfortunately I can still reproduce
Am 03.01.2022 um 15:00 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 03/01/2022 13:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 03.01.2022 um 12:33 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 03/01/2022 11:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks Marc.
In the meantime, I can also say, that it happens for TC 8.5 using
JSSE or OpenSSL and NIO or NIO2. I did not t
On 03/01/2022 14:20, Rainer Jung wrote:
Unfortunately it seems the deadlock has just moved:
Thanks for the quick turn-around.
I'll continue looking for a fix for this.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.ap
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new e2c2d39 BZ65757: Fix forgotten test case
e2c2d39 is d
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new d34f930 Changelog for 65757
d34f930 is described belo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65770
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #4)
> Why is it not possible to use the background process to
> detect mtime change of cert/private key and initiate a connector reload?
It is possible. It's
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push:
new 2269c82 BZ65757: Fix forgotten test case
2269c82
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push:
new bbd7ebf Changelog for 65757
bbd7ebf is described
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 915c2d9 BZ65757: Fix forgotten test case
915c2d9 is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65780
--- Comment #2 from Dapeng Zhang ---
A stacktrace is the following:
SEVERE: Exception while executing runnable
io.grpc.internal.ServerImpl$JumpToApplicationThreadServerStreamListener$1HalfClosed@77087c61
java.lang.NullPointerException
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 2bfbbef BZ65757: Fix forgotten test case
2bfbbef is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65770
--- Comment #6 from Anders Rundgren ---
> The OP recommends using a package that is limited (APR only), fragile
> (custom non-daemon watcher thread, suspicious call behavior, and (IMHO)
> unnecessary.
I'm merely proposing adding this kind of f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65780
Dapeng Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail bec
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 6285e75 Improve fix to avoid deadlock reported on
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 6fa3fd2 Improve fix to avoid deadlock reported on
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push:
new 8ba16e0 Improve fix to avoid deadlock reported o
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ca4f298 Improve fix to avoid deadlock reported on so
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push:
new 4957254 Fix build. Use new sendResetLock in asyn
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new bd0657c Fix build. Use new sendResetLock in async ha
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 16847e1 Fix build. Use new sendResetLock in async
Unfortunately I can still reproduce a deadlock on 8.5. I saw the non-8.5
update a few minutes ago, so maybe more changes are coming. Just wanted
to let you know. jstack output attached. Reproduction based on
6285e750e2b640fa9c59c11c09a753a36a5396b8.
Am 03.01.2022 um 18:25 schrieb ma...@apache.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 12:32 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2022 11:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:53 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
> >>
> >> For reference: this is probably the ticket about moving JDT (and ECJ) to
> >> Java 11:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65773
Arshiya changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
Am 2022-01-03 um 12:20 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:53 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
For reference: this is probably the ticket about moving JDT (and ECJ) to
Java 11:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=572389
And this is the parallel mail discussion:
https://www.ecli
40 matches
Mail list logo
