Re: [tomcat] 03/03: Add support for coercing LambdaExpression to any functional interface

пт, 9 июл. 2021 г. в 00:07, Mark Thomas : > > On 08/07/2021 22:05, ma...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > markt pushed a commit to branch main > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git > > > > commit 2fcb104294b

Re: [tomcat] 03/03: Add support for coercing LambdaExpression to any functional interface

On 09/07/2021 09:58, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: Thanks Konstantin. This is good feedback. пт, 9 июл. 2021 г. в 00:07, Mark Thomas : Add support for coercing LambdaExpression to any functional interface The implementation for this turned out to be a lot simpler than I initially thoug

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 in tomcat

Hi, I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something? If we need it I will work on it next week ;-) -- Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 in tomcat

On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something? If we need it I will work on it next week ;-) To clarify, you mean checking Tomcat can (and implementing if it can't) the ability to configure supported SSL protocols per virtual

Re: [tomcat] 03/03: Add support for coercing LambdaExpression to any functional interface

пт, 9 июл. 2021 г. в 12:19, Mark Thomas : > > On 09/07/2021 09:58, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > Thanks Konstantin. This is good feedback. > > [...] > > > I wonder how Java itself (a java compiler) deals with coercion of > > lambdas to interfaces. Either it generates calls to some helper API, > > o

Re: [tomcat] 03/03: Add support for coercing LambdaExpression to any functional interface

On 09/07/2021 11:40, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: пт, 9 июл. 2021 г. в 12:19, Mark Thomas : On 09/07/2021 09:58, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: Thanks Konstantin. This is good feedback. [...] I wonder how Java itself (a java compiler) deals with coercion of lambdas to interfaces. Either it generate

[GitHub] [tomcat] cklein05 commented on pull request #428: Enhancement: Additional user attributes queried by (some) realms

cklein05 commented on pull request #428: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/428#issuecomment-877095921 Okay, let's make some decisions (Bob Ross? _Here's a class, and it has a friend..._) Since there's no public `setFoo()` method in `GenericPrincipal` (attributes are only se

[GitHub] [tomcat] michael-o commented on pull request #428: Enhancement: Additional user attributes queried by (some) realms

michael-o commented on pull request #428: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/428#issuecomment-877097848 > Sun's standard LDAP provider returns Strings only) ...no. I use byte arrays with this all the time. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To res

[GitHub] [tomcat] cklein05 commented on pull request #428: Enhancement: Additional user attributes queried by (some) realms

cklein05 commented on pull request #428: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/428#issuecomment-877110440 In its default configuration it does. You can configure it for byte array as well, I know. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

[GitHub] [tomcat] cklein05 edited a comment on pull request #428: Enhancement: Additional user attributes queried by (some) realms

cklein05 edited a comment on pull request #428: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/428#issuecomment-877095921 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To uns

Re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 in tomcat

On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote: On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something? If we need it I will work on it next week ;-) To clarify, you mean checking Tomcat can (and implementing if it can't) the ability to conf

[tomcat] branch main updated (cd6be41 -> 0827d1c)

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a change to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git. from cd6be41 Slightly more interesting test case new 1b72878 Remove the completed TODO (it was for an i18n string in t

[tomcat] 02/02: Check requirements of functional interface rather than annotation

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git commit 0827d1ce4200ad030a9c3496349b240fefeb53a7 Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Fri Jul 9 13:07:14 2021 +0100 Check requireme

[tomcat] 01/02: Remove the completed TODO (it was for an i18n string in the exception)

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git commit 1b728785484e2baf9c42b2efdb882547f90fde88 Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Fri Jul 9 12:02:46 2021 +0100 Remove the comp

[GitHub] [tomcat] markt-asf commented on pull request #428: Enhancement: Additional user attributes queried by (some) realms

markt-asf commented on pull request #428: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/428#issuecomment-877146000 Security concerns only arise with untrusted apps. Untrusted apps have to run under a SecurityManager else they have access to reflection and can do pretty much whatever they like

Re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 in tomcat

Jean-Ferderic, On 7/9/21 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote: On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something? If we need it I will work on it next week ;-) To clarify, you mean checking T

[tomcat] branch main updated: Fix Ant download for Travis build

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 4c53b97 Fix Ant download for Travis build 4c53b97 is

[tomcat] branch 10.0.x updated: Fix Ant download for Travis build

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push: new 59fca08 Fix Ant download for Travis build 59fca0

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fix Ant download for Travis build

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 6f01c78 Fix Ant download for Travis build 6f01c78

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Fix Ant download for Travis build

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 1903946 Fix Ant download for Travis build 1903946

Re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 in tomcat

On 09/07/2021 15:15, Christopher Schultz wrote: Jean-Ferderic, On 7/9/21 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote: On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something? If we need it I will work on i

buildbot failure in on tomcat-10.0.x

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-10.0.x while building tomcat. Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-10.0.x/builds/90 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc

[tomcat] branch 10.0.x updated: Possible fix for intermittent unit test failure

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push: new d36f85b Possible fix for intermittent unit test

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Possible fix for intermittent unit test failure

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new eb87e9d Possible fix for intermittent unit test fa

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Possible fix for intermittent unit test failure

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 47653e6 Possible fix for intermittent unit test fa

Re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 in tomcat

Hi Jean-Frederic, how do you make sure, that your tests actually land in the correct SSLHost? You are using the same server certificate, so a check on the client side might not be easy. I would find a test more convincing, if the three TLS hosts would use three different certificates and you c

buildbot success in on tomcat-10.0.x

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-10.0.x while building tomcat. Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-10.0.x/builds/91 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

[Bug 65443] New: Allow subclassing CorsFilter

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443 Bug ID: 65443 Summary: Allow subclassing CorsFilter Product: Tomcat 9 Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Bug 65443] Allow subclassing CorsFilter

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz --- Sounds like a perfect opportunity for you to supply a patch (attached here) or a pull-request via GitHub. I would support its inclusion into Tomcat. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are t

[GitHub] [tomcat] ekkelenkamp opened a new pull request #432: Allow subclassing CorsFilter getAllowedOrigins() and isAnyOriginAllow…

ekkelenkamp opened a new pull request #432: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/432 I would like to be able to subclass the CorsFilter clases to be able to provide a custom list of allowed origins, instead of configure them from the init parameters. This will allow providing the all

[Bug 65443] Allow subclassing CorsFilter

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443 --- Comment #2 from ekkelenk...@gmail.com --- Just created a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/432 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.