https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Arshiya changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #9 from Arshiya ---
Please
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat ---
Ok, so this NPE will be caught and logged with no major consequences. There is
normally no way it could happen, however (the SocketChannel of the NioChannel
is null, which only happens for the closed chan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #11 from Arshiya ---
Thank you for the swift response Remy.
For a few hours the application accepts requests and processes fine , but
suddenly after this exception is logged , none of the requests are accepted
(tps drops to 0) .
I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #12 from Remy Maucherat ---
I made a mistake, I was not looking at the right call to events(). So this
should be tightened up [although I don't see how it can end up in this
situation].
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 2212a10 Restore try catch around Poller.events
22
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 981a5f2 Restore try catch around Poller.events
981a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #13 from Remy Maucherat ---
A previous refactoring of the Poller.events() could cause this uncaught
exception to occur. This is fixed in 10.0.0-M10 and 9.0.40 where the NPE will
be logged properly and Tomcat should be able to contin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #14 from Arshiya ---
Thanks a ton Remy!
Any update on the tentative release date of 9.0.40 please .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 1c07384 Restore try catch around Poller.events
1c0
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64850
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Mark Tho
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:08 PM wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
> n
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64549
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark Tho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64550
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark Tho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64849
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
The first thing we are going to need to do is fix the JPMS names so they agree
with the names used by the spec APIs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
Konstantin,
On 10/26/20 20:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 00:09, Mark Thomas :
Hi all,
The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of
migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both
for migrating and for sticking with svn.
As
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64850
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
I honestly don't see the point of using UDS in Tomcat, ever. I'm not going to
stop anyone from trying it, but:
1. UDS only works within a single kernel (so no inter-host communication)
2. TCP localho
On 27/10/2020 17:34, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:08 PM wrote:
>
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>
>> markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
>>
>>
>> The following commit(s)
Hi all,
We are starting to get JPMS related bug reports. Resolving the issues is
technically simple but depends on us deciding on the names to use for
the various modules.
The names we choose for our own modules are easy. Generally we are using
the same or derivation from the OSGi module name.
T
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64850
--- Comment #4 from Graham Leggett ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #3)
> If you are that concerned about latency and
> throughput, remove the reverse proxy and go straight to Tomcat.
Performance is largely irrelevant in this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64850
--- Comment #5 from Graham Leggett ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #1)
> This could have happened years ago with
> https://github.com/kohlschutter/junixsocket. Do you plan to use with
> mod_proxy UDS support?
Yes.
Right now given
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Venkat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|RESOLVED
22 matches
Mail list logo
