https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62371
--- Comment #24 from ZhiFeng Hu ---
How to remove the validation for host name?
I want to use any string as the host name .
Would you please let us choice ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62371
--- Comment #25 from Mark Thomas ---
The Host validation is not optional. It is a specification requirement.
The changes discussed in comment #14 and comment #15 (using the same rules for
the final segment as the other segments) have been made
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62371
--- Comment #26 from ZhiFeng Hu ---
Though it was a specification. why not gave us an setting or configuration to
disable the check ?
Gave us a switch please. or we can not upgrade our projects to latest tomcat.
or we should have to switch to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62371
--- Comment #27 from Mark Thomas ---
Simply wait (until early next month) for next release round and upgrade then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 14:23:01 2018
New Revision: 1832105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832105&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Add an option, ipv6Canonical, to the AccessLogValve that causes IPv6 addresses
to be output in canonical form def
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51497
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3296
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler schedu
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 14:36:29 2018
New Revision: 1832106
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832106&view=rev
Log:
Fix Javadoc
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/IPv6Utils.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/IPv6Utils.java
URL:
http://
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 14:47:45 2018
New Revision: 1832108
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832108&view=rev
Log:
Fix some Javadoc errors reported by Eclipse.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/filters/CorsFilter.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/filters
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3297
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sch
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51587
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51953
--- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas ---
It has been rather too long since this was last looked at. Apologies for that.
I'm looking at this now.
The good news is that the patch applies cleanly to trunk (9.0.x). There are
some compilation issues to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62391
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz ---
IIRC, java.exe will always open a command-prompt to run the command. That's why
javaw.exe exists.
For a "server install", does that mean that a console needs to be available
because java.exe will run
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62391
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Take a look at the svn history. As far as I can tell, javaw.exe has never been
used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62391
--- Comment #4 from Igal Sapir ---
> IIRC, java.exe will always open a command-prompt to run the command. That's
> why javaw.exe exists.
Right, but that is for Windowed, GUI applications where you don't want a
console window to open with the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62404
Bug ID: 62404
Summary: Visibility issue on field
org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.throwOnFailure
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Sta
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62404
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62404
--- Comment #2 from Laszlo Magyar ---
It seems to me this class was thread safe before this field was added.
I just thought it is a bug to violate this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62391
--- Comment #5 from Igal Sapir ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
>
> 2. Does the Windows installer have a similar problem?
I just ran the Windows Service Installer executable of Tomcat 9.0.8 on Windows
10 and pointed it to the Ser
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 20:33:35 2018
New Revision: 1832124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832124&view=rev
Log:
First part of implementation for BZ 51953
Add a NetMask utility class and some test cases
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/NetMask.java (with props
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51953
--- Comment #25 from Mark Thomas ---
I've just committed the NetMask class and associated test case.
Can I just say "Nice code". An elegant solution and very clearly commented.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
On 23/05/18 21:33, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed May 23 20:33:35 2018
> New Revision: 1832124
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832124&view=rev
> Log:
> First part of implementation for BZ 51953
> Add a NetMask utility class and some test cases
The code looks good t
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 20:46:01 2018
New Revision: 1832125
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832125&view=rev
Log:
Few more test cases
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/util/TestNetMask.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/util/TestNetMask.java
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 20:48:14 2018
New Revision: 1832127
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832127&view=rev
Log:
Fix import
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/NetMask.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/NetMask.java
URL:
http://svn.apach
Author: markt
Date: Wed May 23 20:57:55 2018
New Revision: 1832129
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832129&view=rev
Log:
Additional test cases to get to 100% code coverage of the new utility class.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/util/TestNetMask.java
Modified: tomcat/t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405
Bug ID: 62405
Summary: Add Rereadable Request Filter
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405
George Stanchev changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from George Stanc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405
--- Comment #2 from Igal Sapir ---
(In reply to George Stanchev from comment #1)
> I am just curious, what happens if a bad actor decides to send a 10 gig
> request and the filter is engaged. Obviously you have to read the whole
> thing to memo
28 matches
Mail list logo
