https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61164
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
The updated patch looks good. Thanks. I noticed that the import order has
changed. If you could undo that it would be good but it isn't a big deal to fix
when the patch is applied.
Regarding tracking contain
Hi,
This was noted yesterday in #tomcat:
the tomcat85 repo has a tag TOMCAT_8_0_14 which has a
message "Tag 8.5.14" ...
but git diff TOMCAT_8_5_14 TOMCAT_8_0_14 shows no output
I took a look at SVN and the tags seem right, but maybe they were
broken and later fixed post replication? The co
2017-07-25 2:22 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.19 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.16 release are:
>
> - Enable TLS connectors to use Java key stores that contain multiple
> keys where each key has a separate password. Based
Hello everyone.
My name is João Paulo, I am a graduate student the Federal University of
Uberlandia, Brazil.
I was analyzing the modularization of some classes of Tomcat, and I
identified some opportunities for cohesion improvement in the following
classes:
DataSourceProxy
ConnectionPool
BasicD
On 25/07/17 12:49, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2017-07-25 2:22 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.19 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> The major changes compared to the 8.5.16 release are:
>>
>> - Enable TLS connectors to use Java key stores that contain multiple
>>
On 25/07/17 13:55, João Paulo Lemes Machado wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> My name is João Paulo, I am a graduate student the Federal University of
> Uberlandia, Brazil.
>
> I was analyzing the modularization of some classes of Tomcat, and I
> identified some opportunities for cohesion improvement
On 25/07/17 12:34, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This was noted yesterday in #tomcat:
>
> the tomcat85 repo has a tag TOMCAT_8_0_14 which has a
> message "Tag 8.5.14" ...
> but git diff TOMCAT_8_5_14 TOMCAT_8_0_14 shows no output
>
> I took a look at SVN and the tags seem right, but may
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/07/17 12:34, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This was noted yesterday in #tomcat:
>>
>> the tomcat85 repo has a tag TOMCAT_8_0_14 which has a
>> message "Tag 8.5.14" ...
>> but git diff TOMCAT_8_5_14 TOMCAT_8_0_14 shows no outp
Hi Mark, tanks for the comment.
Let me take the DataSourceProxy as example.
This class has 142 methods of which 112 are get () and set () methods.
We could mark these methods as deprecated and copy them to a new class:
DataSourceProxyConfig, but we would leave them in the DataSourceProxy class,
ump/public/workspace/objenesis/main/target/objenesis-2.7-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Dexamples.sources.skip=true
-Dcommons-daemon.jar=/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/daemon/dist/commons-daemon-20170725.jar
-Dtest.openssl.path=/srv/gump/public/workspace/openssl-1.0.2/dest-20170725/bin/openssl
-Dex
The proposed 9.0.0.M25 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M25
Unit test passed.
Our test web application runs fine.
--
From:Mark Thomas
Time:2017 Jul 25 (Tue) 07:19
To:Tomcat Develope
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61164
--- Comment #7 from Zemian Deng ---
Mark, thanks for all the tips. No problem, I can re-fix the imports for better
merge experience.
Yes, I agree that we should support just '%X' for now until users demands the
finer abort types, then we can a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61164
--- Comment #8 from Zemian Deng ---
I have added the isIoAllowed with action code check to the PR now. Please
review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
