Author: violetagg
Date: Tue May 30 07:51:15 2017
New Revision: 1796754
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796754&view=rev
Log:
Introduce new API - WsSession#suspend/WsSession#resume that can be used to
suspend/resume reading of the incoming messages.
Added:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/test/org
Author: violetagg
Date: Tue May 30 07:59:12 2017
New Revision: 1796761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796761&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Propchange: tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:27:23 2017
New Revision: 1796787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796787&view=rev
Log:
Refactor - simplify
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Localizer.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Localizer.java
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:31:32 2017
New Revision: 1796789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796789&view=rev
Log:
Simplify with varargs
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Localizer.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Localizer.java
URL
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:35:03 2017
New Revision: 1796795
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796795&view=rev
Log:
Refactor - reduce duplication
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspCompilationContext.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspCompilationCo
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:44:11 2017
New Revision: 1796806
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796806&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787
Improve error message when JSP compiler configuration options are not valid.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:47:31 2017
New Revision: 1796810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796810&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787
Improve error message when JSP compiler configuration options are not valid.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:49:00 2017
New Revision: 1796815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796815&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787
Improve error message when JSP compiler configuration options are not valid.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:51:33 2017
New Revision: 1796816
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796816&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787
Improve error message when JSP compiler configuration options are not valid.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44787
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 08:53:08 2017
New Revision: 1796818
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796818&view=rev
Log:
Remove unused i18n string
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/resources/LocalStrings.properties
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/re
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-8-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/1016
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61134
Bug ID: 61134
Summary: Unexpected [ ] in public text on default error pages
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.15
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Pr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61134
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Konstanti
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61134
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
That's indeed weird. This has been introduced in r1792132 for 8.5.x.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 11:42:16 2017
New Revision: 1796836
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796836&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832
Add HTTP DIGEST support
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ant/AbstractCatalinaTask.java
tom
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 11:43:16 2017
New Revision: 1796837
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796837&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832
Add HTTP DIGEST support
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/java/org/a
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 11:44:49 2017
New Revision: 1796838
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796838&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832
Add HTTP DIGEST support
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/java/org/a
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 11:46:31 2017
New Revision: 1796839
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796839&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832
Add HTTP DIGEST support
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-8-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/1017
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
Hello,
Looking at javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagLibraryInfo, uri and prefix fields
are declared final while according to the spec and tomcat documentation
they should not be.
Is that intentionally done?
Thank you,
Katya
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/tagext/
TagL
Author: violetagg
Date: Tue May 30 14:30:56 2017
New Revision: 1796873
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796873&view=rev
Log:
Correct typo in Jar Scan Filter Configuration Reference. Issue reported via
comments.apache.org.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
tomcat/tru
On 30/05/17 13:55, Katya Todorova wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking at javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagLibraryInfo, uri and prefix fields
> are declared final while according to the spec and tomcat documentation
> they should not be.
>
> Is that intentionally done?
No. It is a bug. Please open a Bugzilla i
Author: violetagg
Date: Tue May 30 14:39:07 2017
New Revision: 1796875
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796875&view=rev
Log:
Correct typo in Jar Scan Filter Configuration Reference. Issue reported via
comments.apache.org.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8
Author: violetagg
Date: Tue May 30 14:40:59 2017
New Revision: 1796876
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796876&view=rev
Log:
Correct typo in Jar Scan Filter Configuration Reference. Issue reported via
comments.apache.org.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 15:15:19 2017
New Revision: 1796878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796878&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Add the RELEASE-NOTES file to the root of the installation created by the
Tomcat installer for Windows to make it
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 15:16:33 2017
New Revision: 1796879
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796879&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Add the RELEASE-NOTES file to the root of the installation created by the
Tomcat installer for Windows to make it
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 15:18:18 2017
New Revision: 1796881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796881&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Add the RELEASE-NOTES file to the root of the installation created by the
Tomcat installer for Windows to make it
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 30 15:22:07 2017
New Revision: 1796882
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796882&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Add the RELEASE-NOTES file to the root of the installation created by the
Tomcat installer for Windows to make it
Hi Igal @ Lucee.org,
Thanks for getting in touch with us.
Hello,
Please contact Premier PC Support by calling 844-814-5544 or you can visit
http://mydeviceadvice.com/supportmefirst/ and select the "Request Support" icon
in the top right corner to enter an online session with a representative.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/05/17 21:46, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I thought there was a BZ keyword for this, but there isn't. I've just
>> created an enhancement in BZ[1] that should be left for someone looking
>> to submit a small patch, and I'd lik
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46173
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Is the below a common thing on the Tomcat Dev list or is this just spam?
On 5/30/2017 8:24 AM, PCT Customer Service wrote:
Hi Igal @ Lucee.org,
Thanks for getting in touch with us.
Hello,
Please contact Premier PC Support by calling 844-814-5544 or you can visit
http://mydeviceadvice.com/sup
> From: Igal @ Lucee.org [mailto:i...@lucee.org]
> Subject: Re: [251E0E7D839A] PC Treasures - Running Tomcat in an IDE
> Is the below a common thing on the Tomcat Dev list or is this just spam?
It's not common and also not acceptable.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR
On 30/05/2017 17:19, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Igal @ Lucee.org [mailto:i...@lucee.org]
>> Subject: Re: [251E0E7D839A] PC Treasures - Running Tomcat in an IDE
>
>> Is the below a common thing on the Tomcat Dev list or is this just spam?
>
> It's not common and also not acceptable.
I'm
On 5/30/2017 10:16 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/05/2017 17:19, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
It's not common and also not acceptable.
I'm on it. I'll make sure they are unsubscribed from all ASF lists and
banned from this one.
Thank you!
Author: fschumacher
Date: Tue May 30 17:46:59 2017
New Revision: 1796906
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796906&view=rev
Log:
Spellcheck (merge r1796698 from /tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/globalresou
Author: fschumacher
Date: Tue May 30 17:55:25 2017
New Revision: 1796907
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1796907&view=rev
Log:
Spellcheck (merge r1796906 from /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk)
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/globalreso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/26/17 7:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could
>> be removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of
>> connectors came
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-8-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/1020
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61134
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
I thought this was intentional. Mark added [...] around all dynamic elements to
make it clear without using e.g. quotes, etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to
> have a wrapper for it.
Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented with this yet?
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To un
On 05/26/2017 01:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> It feels a bit late to do this for 9.0.x although we code if we wanted
> to. It is more of an option for 10.0.x.
Tomcat 9 is still in an alpha stage and not widely deployed yet. I
wouldn't be shocked if APR was dropped in this release.
Emmanuel Bourg
On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to
>> have a wrapper for it.
>
> Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented with this yet?
I've looked at it, but not worked with
2017-05-30 15:57 GMT-05:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >
> >> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to
> >> have a wrapper for it.
> >
> > Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented wi
Hi all,
I've been thinking about things that we could do for Tomcat to help
bring in new contributors and to be more appealing to new developers.
Right now we have http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html which has
a few bullet points and links to documentation, which is a bit verbose,
about how
48 matches
Mail list logo
