https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290
--- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
After further investigation this must be handled in Makefile.in. A simple fix:
Index: Makefile.in
===
--- Makefile.in (R
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60301
Bug ID: 60301
Summary: Cannot exchange libtool bundled with apr with a newer
one
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 1.2.10
Hardware: HP
OS: HP-UX
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60202
--- Comment #15 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Ben from comment #14)
> That looks like a pretty elegant solution. How would it interact with
> third-party realms?
A third party realm would have to implement the new API method.
--
You a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
Created attachment 34401
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34401&action=edit
Tomcat get/setConnector changes
Ok, maybe it's not very intuitive, and I don't see the point of having a
c
Hi Remy,
2016-10-09 22:34 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-10-03 18:21 GMT+03:00 Rémy Maucherat :
> >
> > 2016-10-03 16:58 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> >
> > > Does this means that you are Ok to back port the ByteBuffer
replacement in
> > > Tomcat 8.5?
> > >
> > > I don't want to
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Oct 24 20:22:57 2016
New Revision: 1766439
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1766439&view=rev
Log:
Move changelog entries:
- ResourceLink change to Catalina
- native update to Other
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x
2016-10-24 20:18 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> There are no issues reported for the refactored functionality available in
> 9.0.0.M11.
> I think it is safe to back port the changes for the next 8.5 release.
> Do you see any issues?
>
> Ok, so it probably works. I suppose it's up to me, at some p
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #2 from Axel U ---
The changes made will do the trick in regards to using the supplied connector.
It leaves the second part of my comment open though. So, is there any harm if
the getServer() method always adds an APR LifescyleLi
