https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60161
--- Comment #6 from Santhana Preethi ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> The switch from the container's logger to a dedicated Rewrite logger is
> problematic too.
I don't think writing all rewrite logs to container's logger is a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60161
Santhana Preethi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34287|0 |1
is obsolete|
ump/public/workspace/objenesis/main/target/objenesis-2.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Dexamples.sources.skip=true
-Dcommons-daemon.jar=/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/daemon/dist/commons-daemon-20160922.jar
-Dtest.openssl.path=/srv/gump/public/workspace/openssl-master/dest-20160922/bin/openssl
-Dex
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60161
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Santhana Preethi from comment #6)
> > Now so? I would think this might be the one good part of this proposed
> > patch, because it makes it easier to adjust the log level of *only* the
> > Rew
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60164
Bug ID: 60164
Summary: Add log4j-web*.jar to
tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanFilter.jarsToScan
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.5
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Giovacchini ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #2)
Hi, the request were coming from valid clients, I was doing them with one of
our applications and no one else was calling, it's a test environment in a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
Andrea Giovacchini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas
Author: markt
Date: Thu Sep 22 11:02:43 2016
New Revision: 1761893
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1761893&view=rev
Log:
Update the minimum recommended OpenSSL version due to known issues with 1.0.2h
Modified:
tomcat/native/trunk/native/srclib/VERSIONS
tomcat/native/trunk/xdocs/misc
Author: markt
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:56:22 2016
New Revision: 1761953
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1761953&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Apache: Propagate errors reading the request body from the client to mod_jk so
Tomcat sees an error rather than a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Philippe Mouawad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #31 from Philippe Mouawad ---
Hello Mark,
What's the expected release date for mod_jk 1.2.42 ?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
Bug ID: 60166
Summary: According to RFC 6455 the server should reply on a a
handshake with "HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols"
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.5
Hardware: P
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Philippe Mouawad changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47714
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
OS|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
Philippe Mouawad changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||57485
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #32 from Mark Thomas ---
Possibly as early as next week. Very likely within the next month. Exact timing
will depend on other demands on my time. Watch the dev list for more info.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
--- Comment #2 from hen...@websolver.dk ---
Hi Remy,
Thanks for the fast answer. I have done some further readings on the RFC 2616
(the HTTP protocol RFC), that is referred to by the RFC 6455.
In section 6.1 it says:
The first line of a Respon
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
hen...@websolver.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat ---
Right, I'll let you have fun with your BZ then :) Hopefully you're not
expecting a fix, ever.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
Hi,
2016-09-14 14:37 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> On 13/09/2016 19:07, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> > 2016-08-30 15:35 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
>
>
> >> I introduced CoyoteOutputStream.write(ByteBuffer) it uses new methods
> >> with ByteBuffer instead of ByteChunk.
> >> Next step is to replac
Hi,
2016-09-14 20:43 GMT+03:00 Rémy Maucherat :
>
> 2016-09-13 20:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> > I would like to back port these changes to Tomcat 8.5 if you do not have
> > any concerns.
> >
> > -0.1. I think this is ok, but not certain yet.
> - Performance is ok for the "common" unencryp
2016-09-22 17:13 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> Hi,
>
> 2016-09-14 20:43 GMT+03:00 Rémy Maucherat :
> >
> > 2016-09-13 20:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> >
> > > I would like to back port these changes to Tomcat 8.5 if you do not
> have
> > > any concerns.
> > >
> > > -0.1. I think this is ok,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60161
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34290|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
--- Comment #5 from hen...@websolver.dk ---
Mark and Remy
Thanks for your answers.
I will request the library developer for a change.
Keep up the good Work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Gavin,
On 9/22/16 1:03 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Please find attached 3 patches for tweaks to the rat-excludes file in trunk
> and the 8.0 and 8.5 branches.
>
> RAT tests are currently producing invalid xml reports due to files that
> should be excluded
> (and therefore xml parser cant convert
2016-09-22 18:29 GMT+03:00 Rémy Maucherat :
>
> 2016-09-22 17:13 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2016-09-14 20:43 GMT+03:00 Rémy Maucherat :
> > >
> > > 2016-09-13 20:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> > >
> > > > I would like to back port these changes to Tomcat 8.5 if you do not
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 3:25 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] - rat-output.xml tweaks for tc8.0.x tc8.5.x trunk
>
> Gavin,
>
> On 9/22/16 1:03 AM, Gavin McDonald wrot
Hi Gavin,
Please file the patch to trunk, and it will be backported to 8.5.x, 8.x if
possible.
--
From:Gavin McDonald
Time:2016 Sep 23 (Fri) 07:17
To:Tomcat Developers List
Subject:RE: [PATCH] - rat-output.xml tweaks for tc8.0.x t
32 matches
Mail list logo
