https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59879
Bug ID: 59879
Summary: StatementCache interceptor returns ResultSet objects
that throw exception on toString()
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59879
Julian Reschke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|StatementCache interceptor |StatementCache interceptor
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59876
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Remy Mau
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59824
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #1)
> There is no provision to be able to set properties on the fomatters, so it
> is more difficult to add this support. Adding your own format
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
I do not understand why you are unwilling to add two sentences to the docs
about this. This is not rocket science.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #1)
> There is no provision to be able to set properties on the fomatters,
That is not true.
It is not documented, but formatters can be configured. It is the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
--- Comment #4 from Remy Maucherat ---
Ok, I really don't understand how this works looking at the FileHandler code,
but nice to know.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
All,
Michael Deiner found a buffer overflow in the call to FD_SET macro on
line 291 of jk_connect.c:
280> do {
281>rc = connect(sd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr->sa.sin,
addr->salen);
282>} while (rc == -1 && errno == EINTR);
283>
284>if ((rc == -1) && (errno == EINPROGRESS ||
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONT
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59862
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
Why is this necessary? J2EE doesn't support jars-within-jars, does it? Scanning
jars-within-jars would be non-spec-compliant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
On 16/07/2016 02:43, jayani sumudini wrote:
> hello,
> I am a beginner to bug fixing.I hope to built tomcat.Please
> help me to select easy bug.
Welcome to the Apache Tomcat developer community.
Take a look at the open bugs in Bugzilla (I suggest you start with the
most recent and work backwards)
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59862
--- Comment #5 from Terence Bandoian ---
Does J2EE specifically prohibit scanning nested JARs? If not, then there would
be nothing "non-spec-compliant" about doing so.
Tomcat already scans nested JARS. The proposed modification allows users to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115
Marco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #4)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #0)
> > I have configured my Connector to listen to address="127.0.0.1" only. Single
> > hos
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59866
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Anybody who c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #6 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #4)
> Instead, it asks the OS what the hostname of the current machine is, then
> uses that. So if your hostname is "erasmus", then InetAddress.getLocalHost
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #7 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #6)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #4)
> > Instead, it asks the OS what the hostname of the current machine is, then
> > uses t
Hi Chris,
thanks for picking this topic.
Am 18.07.2016 um 17:02 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
All,
Michael Deiner found a buffer overflow in the call to FD_SET macro on
line 291 of jk_connect.c:
280> do {
281>rc = connect(sd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr->sa.sin,
addr->salen);
282>
Rainer,
On 7/18/16 5:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> thanks for picking this topic.
>
> Am 18.07.2016 um 17:02 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>> All,
>>
>> Michael Deiner found a buffer overflow in the call to FD_SET macro on
>> line 291 of jk_connect.c:
>>
>> 280> do {
>> 281>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59868
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #6)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #4)
> > Instead, it asks the OS what the hostname of the current machine is, then
> > uses that. So if your
25 matches
Mail list logo
