Author: markt
Date: Thu Dec 3 09:42:56 2015
New Revision: 1717731
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717731&view=rev
Log:
Authentication names should be in upper case.
This doesn't affect this test now, but it does when porting to JASPIC.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57324
--- Comment #13 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
Any ambitions to port this back to 6.0.x?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
2015-12-02 0:02 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> The proposed 8.0.30 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.30
>
> Rémy
Author: remm
Date: Thu Dec 3 12:03:22 2015
New Revision: 1717740
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717740&view=rev
Log:
Forgot to replicate the root redirect in the jaspic form code.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/jaspic/provider/modules/FormAuthModule.ja
+1 for non-binding.
Testing environment:
RHEL 6.2, JDK 1.7.0_67, tcnative 1.2.2, apr 1.5.2
Test results:
All the test cases of BIO/NIO/NIO2/APR has successfully passed.
Best,
Huxing Zhang
--
From:Rémy Maucherat
Time:2015 Dec 3 (Th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58686
Bug ID: 58686
Summary: javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: java.io.IOException:
Error writing to server JAX-WS request with a payload
over 2MB
Product: Tomcat 8
V
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58686
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: remm
Date: Thu Dec 3 14:25:35 2015
New Revision: 1717771
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717771&view=rev
Log:
Expose SSL_renegotiate (the version in SSLSocket needs a socket associated with
it).
Modified:
tomcat/native/trunk/native/src/ssl.c
Modified: tomcat/native/trunk/nat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57324
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Schultz ---
I don't intend for this to sound confrontational, but would you care to submit
a patch?
Tomcat 7 and higher differ substantially from Tomcat 6 and so a back-port might
not be trivial. If you are mot
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57489
--- Comment #18 from Barry Coughlan ---
Created attachment 33321
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33321&action=edit
Test cases for closing websockets
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57489
--- Comment #19 from Barry Coughlan ---
Created attachment 33322
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33322&action=edit
Websocket client for testing TCP behaviour
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57489
--- Comment #20 from Barry Coughlan ---
Test cases attached - there are a few TODO comments in the attached files that
could do with a pair of eyes. It's a bit messier than I had hoped but the test
results match up with my manual testing.
Also
Author: remm
Date: Thu Dec 3 17:05:59 2015
New Revision: 1717806
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717806&view=rev
Log:
Add matching renegotiate method. Note that this will cause an exception without
a new native, but however using it in the SSL engine right now will already
cause an excep
Author: remm
Date: Thu Dec 3 17:14:57 2015
New Revision: 1717808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717808&view=rev
Log:
- Add some renegotiation code to the OpenSSL SSLEngine. It seems to do
something, but certificate extraction doesn't work (returns null).
- Allow using the OpenSSL engine
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57324
--- Comment #15 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #14)
> I don't intend for this to sound confrontational, but would you care to
> submit a patch?
>
> Tomcat 7 and higher differ substantia
Am 30.11.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
Felix,
On 11/24/15 3:47 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Am 23.11.2015 um 03:19 schrieb Huxing Zhang:
Hi fschumacher,
Just a friendly reminder that I had a discussion with kkolinko about
this before.
I seems that it is better to explicitly define
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58433
--- Comment #4 from Karl von Randow ---
We have encountered a similar issue. We have used the RemoteIpValve in our
Context, which works well in our use cases (we didn't encounter your issue).
However it does not work for error pages. It appears
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-nio2 has an issue affecting its community
integration
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.30 release is now available for voting.
>
> The main changes since 8.0.29 are:
>
> - Location headers for redirects now use relative URIs. This can
> be controlled by Context with the useRelativeRedirects attrib
19 matches
Mail list logo
