https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57472
Bug ID: 57472
Summary: performance (classloader?) problems with signed jars
in WEB-INF/lib
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.17
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 10:08:15 2015
New Revision: 1653471
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653471
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57455
Add a note that " may not appear in a path value and throw an IAE if once does.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/conf/catalina.propert
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 10:12:27 2015
New Revision: 1653472
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653472
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57455
Add a note that " may not appear in a path value and throw an IAE if once does.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props cha
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57455
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 10:39:59 2015
New Revision: 1653475
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653475
Log:
Remove use of java.endorsed.dirs since causes errors when starting with Java 9.
Users that need to can still use this via setenv.sh
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
tomcat/trun
On 21/01/2015 10:40, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Jan 21 10:39:59 2015
> New Revision: 1653475
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653475
> Log:
> Remove use of java.endorsed.dirs since causes errors when starting with
> Java 9. Users that need to can still use this via setenv.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Bug ID: 57473
Summary: WarWatcher does not throw any warning if permissions
are broken
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Théo Chamley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||theo...@mley.fr
--
You are receivi
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 13:08:06 2015
New Revision: 1653531
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653531
Log:
Java8 Javadoc fixes
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/collections/ManagedConcurrentWeakHashMap.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/collections/Synchroniz
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
--- Comment #11 from Violeta Georgieva ---
(In reply to Felix Schumacher from comment #9)
> Created attachment 32382 [details]
> Make UEncoder a local variable and introduce a default safe charset enum
>
> This patch uses a local variable
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
--- Comment #10 from Violeta Georgieva ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #7)
> (In reply to Violeta Georgieva from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #4)
> >
> > > UEncoder is used in list(). While
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 13:31:30 2015
New Revision: 1653535
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653535
Log:
Add a test case I have been using to explore possible performance gains in the
EL parser. This is in preparation for the fix for BZ 57441.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/el/par
2015-01-20 23:52 GMT+03:00 :
> Author: fschumacher
> Date: Tue Jan 20 20:52:18 2015
> New Revision: 1653367
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653367
> Log:
> Fix formatting:
> - ':' after
> - max width 80 chars
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
>
> Modified: tom
Am 21. Januar 2015 14:34:41 MEZ, schrieb Konstantin Kolinko
:
>2015-01-20 23:52 GMT+03:00 :
>> Author: fschumacher
>> Date: Tue Jan 20 20:52:18 2015
>> New Revision: 1653367
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653367
>> Log:
>> Fix formatting:
>> - ':' after
>> - max width 80 chars
>>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57108
Unlogic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unlo...@unlogic.se
--
You are receiving
Hi,
I would like to start preparing Tomcat 7.0.58.
If you want to add something to this release please reply here.
Thanks,
Violeta
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 14:49:25 2015
New Revision: 1653546
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653546
Log:
Add an ELParser cache to the ExpressionBuilder. Re-using ELParser instances is
measureably more efficient.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/ExpressionBuilder.java
Modifi
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 15:07:12 2015
New Revision: 1653550
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653550
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Add more logging to WarWatcher, specifically checking for odd states like
non-existent files that were just listed by the file
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 15:13:18 2015
New Revision: 1653552
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653552
Log:
Back-port r1653550 to fix
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Add more logging to WarWatcher, specifically checking for odd states like
non-existent files that were
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 15:31:15 2015
New Revision: 1653558
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653558
Log:
Moved bugfix to correct subsection.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/vi
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 15:32:08 2015
New Revision: 1653559
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653559
Log:
Back-port r1653550 to fix
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Add more logging to WarWatcher, specifically checking for odd states like
non-existent files that were
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
Bug ID: 57476
Summary: Incomplete html pages
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.17
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
On 21/01/2015 15:07, schu...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: schultz
> Date: Wed Jan 21 15:07:12 2015
> New Revision: 1653550
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653550
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
> Add more logging to WarWatcher, specifically checking for odd st
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 21 15:45:06 2015
New Revision: 1653562
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653562
Log:
Fix compilation error
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/deploy/WarWatcher.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/deploy/WarWatcher.java
URL:
http://s
Author: kkolinko
Date: Wed Jan 21 15:45:32 2015
New Revision: 1653564
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653564
Log:
Fix broken XML markup
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/t
Mark,
On 1/21/15 10:45 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Jan 21 15:45:06 2015
> New Revision: 1653562
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653562
> Log:
> Fix compilation error
Just curious: this compiled fine for me. Why the change?
-chris
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/java
Mark,
On 1/21/15 10:37 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/01/2015 15:07, schu...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: schultz
>> Date: Wed Jan 21 15:07:12 2015
>> New Revision: 1653550
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653550
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
>> Add more
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 16:15:56 2015
New Revision: 1653574
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653574
Log:
Prefer CamelCase for localized log strings.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/deploy/LocalStrings.properties
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/deploy/WarWa
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 16:16:40 2015
New Revision: 1653575
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653575
Log:
Prefer CamelCase for log string keys.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/deploy/LocalStrings.properties
tomcat
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 16:18:22 2015
New Revision: 1653576
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653576
Log:
Prefer CamelCase in log string keys.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/deploy/LocalStrings.properties
tomcat/
Am 21. Januar 2015 15:07:50 MEZ, schrieb Violeta Georgieva
:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to start preparing Tomcat 7.0.58.
>If you want to add something to this release please reply here.
Should we include the fix for 57420?
Regards
Felix
>
>Thanks,
>Violeta
-
On 21 January 2015 16:07:21 GMT+00:00, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>On 1/21/15 10:45 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Jan 21 15:45:06 2015
>> New Revision: 1653562
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653562
>> Log:
>> Fix compilation error
>
>Just curious: this co
2015-01-21 18:20 GMT+02:00 Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de>:
>
>
>
> Am 21. Januar 2015 15:07:50 MEZ, schrieb Violeta Georgieva <
violet...@apache.org>:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to start preparing Tomcat 7.0.58.
> >If you want to add something to this release please reply her
Hello
I'm sorry that this mail is not a development issue itself, it is just a
question about Tomcat' exception handling. I was checking some mails at
Tomcat dev list and I found two interesting and contrasting responses
regarding exception handling: one is from Mark Thomas and another is from
Rem
On 21/01/2015 19:14, Felipe Ebert wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm sorry that this mail is not a development issue itself, it is just a
> question about Tomcat' exception handling. I was checking some mails at
> Tomcat dev list and I found two interesting and contrasting responses
> regarding exception hand
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
Bug ID: 57478
Summary: Using non-blocking "Future" instead of blocking
"Future.get" to improve performance?
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
--- Comment #2 from Yu Lin ---
Thanks for the reply.
> Bugzilla is not a discussion for design descisions. This belongs on the dev
> list.
>
I think this is a performance issue, so I posted it here. Or should I send it
to dev@tomcat.apache
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
--- Comment #3 from Chuck Caldarale ---
What part of "belongs on the dev list" was not clear?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change
notification.
The "HowTo" page has been changed by ChristopherSchultz:
https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/HowTo?action=diff&rev1=141&rev2=142
== How to create native launchers for Tomcat ==
See [[
On 21/01/2015 14:07, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start preparing Tomcat 7.0.58.
> If you want to add something to this release please reply here.
I'd recommend holding this off until we get to the bottom of the current
issue (BZ 57476) with 8.0.17 and figure out of the offe
Dear developers, I opened a discussion about the use of blocking
"Future.get()" in Tomcat 8 code on Bugzillar:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
I was suggested to post it in this list. What's your opinion on this issue?
Do you have better suggestions to address this issue?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
--- Comment #2 from Marco ---
Hello,
same problem.
After a last jsp:include in a jsp site the html content is not shown.
No errors in tomcat log. Default Tomcat with port 8080.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
Mark,
On 1/21/15 2:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/01/2015 19:14, Felipe Ebert wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm sorry that this mail is not a development issue itself, it is just a
>> question about Tomcat' exception handling. I was checking some mails at
>> Tomcat dev list and I found two interesting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
I have a single JSP running on 8.0.17 with 4 includes, and the page works just
fine. Can you give more information about your environment? There's also a
thread on the dev list if you want to disc
2015-01-21 23:47 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz :
> To wit:
>
> 1. org.apache.catalina.servlets.DefaultServlet.Range.validate modifies
> the value of the "end" member. That seems ... odd.
>
> 2. copyRange(InputStream, ServletOutputStream) returns IOException
> instead of throwing it. There is one c
2015-01-21 23:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> I'd recommend holding this off until we get to the bottom of the current
> issue (BZ 57476) with 8.0.17 and figure out of the offending code was
> back-ported to 7.0.x.
>
> Good idea. I haven't found anything interesting yet, I looked at the error
page pr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
--- Comment #4 from Marco ---
I make a little test. I add a <%out.flush();%> at the end of the jsp file and
the html content is correct. Without the <%out.flush();%> the html content is
broken.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
--- Comment #6 from Gregor Zurowski ---
That is correct, the only use case would be really just supporting the current
behavior. I would also prefer considering this behavior a bug and handle "null"
as a valid origin (for both the default "
GitHub user gzurowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/16
#57178: Allow CORS requests with Origin header value "null"
See also: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
Signed-off-by: Gregor Zurowski gre...@zurowski.org
You can me
Github user gzurowski closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
Gregor Zurowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32185|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
--- Comment #5 from reibitto ---
I'm seeing similar issues with version 8.0.17 as well. Downgrading back to
8.0.15 made the problems go away for me, so it seems like something introduced
between these versions is causing this.
So far I've
Hi,
I would like to update the coverity scan report.
As the previous one was based on Tomcat 8 (back in the time it was trunk) I
think to base the scan again on Tomcat 8.
Wdyt?
Regards,
Violeta
2015-01-22 0:15 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> On 21/01/2015 14:07, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start preparing Tomcat 7.0.58.
> > If you want to add something to this release please reply here.
>
> I'd recommend holding this off until we get to the bottom of the current
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
--- Comment #6 from Leandro ---
I'm facing exactly the same issue. I've noticed that putting <% out.flush() %>
at the end of the JSP file, everything was OK, but It's not good to assume that
it's the goal to solve that.
--
You are receivi
Am 22. Januar 2015 08:02:47 MEZ, schrieb Violeta Georgieva
:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to update the coverity scan report.
>As the previous one was based on Tomcat 8 (back in the time it was
>trunk) I
>think to base the scan again on Tomcat 8.
>
>Wdyt?
+1
Felix
>
>Regards,
>Violeta
---
59 matches
Mail list logo
