https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57458
--- Comment #2 from Mahmoud Al-Yasein ---
We are not using any of mentioned items, unfortunately I don't have the stack
trace just null pointer exception without stack trace, I'll try to use the
latest version and see
--
You are receiving
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:08:08 2015
New Revision: 1652938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652938
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57446
Ensure that the ServletContext presented to a listener for contextInitialized()
is the same as the one presented when contextDes
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:10:58 2015
New Revision: 1652939
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652939
Log:
Fix formatting:
- ':' after
- max width 80 chars
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:14:29 2015
New Revision: 1652940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652940
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57446
Ensure that the ServletContext presented to a listener for contextInitialized()
is the same as the one presented when contextDes
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:19:44 2015
New Revision: 1652942
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652942
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57446
Ensure that the ServletContext presented to a listener for contextInitialized()
is the same as the one presented when contextDes
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:21:19 2015
New Revision: 1652943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652943
Log: (empty)
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Propchange: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57446
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57441
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Is it at all possible to reliably validate functions at compile time?
Maybe whitelist functions that have name only with no prefix?
BTW, it is possible to use javax.el.ImportHandler.importStatic
it-4.13-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Dobjenesis.jar=/srv/gump/public/workspace/objenesis/main/target/objenesis-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Dtest.reports=output/logs-APR
-Dtomcat-native.tar.gz=/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/daemon/dist/bin/commons-daemon-20150119-native-src.tar.gz
-Dexamples.sources.skip=true
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57460
Bug ID: 57460
Summary: [DB2]Connection broken after few hours but not removed
from the pool?
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57458
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> 7.0.39 is getting on for 2 years old and has a number of known security
> vulnerabilities including one that can result in response mix ups.
>
> Please
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
Bug ID: 57461
Summary: Rename 'JAVA_HOME' message printed by
VersionLoggerListener
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.17
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Se
2015-01-17 2:41 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> The other thought I had (but haven't had time to test for performance
> impact) is that the readPending semaphore is really only useful when the
> previous or current read is non-blocking. A blocking read followed by a
> blocking read doesn't need it.
>
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57446
Birger Zimmermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FI
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57446
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 19/01/2015 10:52, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-01-17 2:41 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> The other thought I had (but haven't had time to test for performance
>> impact) is that the readPending semaphore is really only useful when the
>> previous or current read is non-blocking. A blocking read f
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 11:54:01 2015
New Revision: 1652970
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652970
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
When reporting value of java.home don't make it look like an environment
variable.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/c
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 11:58:26 2015
New Revision: 1652973
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652973
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
When reporting value of java.home don't make it look like an environment
variable.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 12:00:49 2015
New Revision: 1652975
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652975
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
When reporting value of java.home don't make it look like an environment
variable.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Having had a closer look at this, I'm wondering why another configation option
is needed. Why not just add "null" to the list of allowed origins? (This would
still requires a small patch so null is accept
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
--- Comment #3 from Violeta Georgieva ---
Created attachment 32378
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32378&action=edit
Patch
Hi,
What do you think if we switch to UEncoder/UDecoder as regular fields of the
class?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32378|0 |1
is patch|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
1) As far as I see, UDecoder does not have any fields and thus is thread-safe.
The thread safety is not documented, though.
As such, I do not mind creating an instance of UDecoder, as that feels
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57464
Bug ID: 57464
Summary: Please support for TLS Fallback SCSV
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: norma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57464
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57455
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Thanks for the patch. I can confirm that it fixes the issues described. But...
This has the potential to get messy. Neither " nor , is permitted in a file
name in Windows but both are acceptable in unix
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
Bug ID: 57465
Summary: Build TC Native with with latest OpenSSL to address
CVEs
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 1.1.32
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 16:20:27 2015
New Revision: 1653041
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653041
Log:
Simple Javadoc fix (mainly to test the CI system)
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/WebappProperties.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/WebappProperties.java
UR
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #2 from brian.m.pick...@gmail.com ---
Unless I'm somehow mistaken I believe the following CVEs apply to openssl
1.0.1j and I believe tcnative 1.1.31 is built with 1.0.1j.
CVE-2014-3569: 21st October 2014
CVE-2014-8275: 5th Janua
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #3 from brian.m.pick...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to brian.m.pickens from comment #2)
> Unless I'm somehow mistaken I believe the following CVEs apply to openssl
> 1.0.1j and I believe tcnative 1.1.31 is built with 1.0.1j.
>
> CVE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
Again, which of those do you think apply to tc-native? Just because OpenSSL has
a vulnerability that does not mean that tc-native automatically has the
vulnerability.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 19 16:48:14 2015
New Revision: 1653046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653046
Log:
Backport some Javadoc fixes. (Mainly to see if CI for 8.0.x-trunk has been
fixed)
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/Webapp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #5 from brian.m.pick...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4)
> Again, which of those do you think apply to tc-native? Just because OpenSSL
> has a vulnerability that does not mean that tc-native automatically h
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
--- Comment #5 from Felix Schumacher ---
I came up with the same patch as Violeta and it fixes the reported problem
(unpackWARs has to be set to false, if you want to reproduce it and of course
it helps if some sleep statements are inserted
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57467
Bug ID: 57467
Summary: Tomcat 8.0.14 - Using the Wrong Webapp Directory?
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.14
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57467
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57467
--- Comment #2 from Mark Barnes ---
It works for Tomcat 6 and it worked for Tomcat 5. We're upgrading from 6.0.20
to 8.0.14.
The configuration reference does say this:
The Application Base directory for this virtual host. This is the pat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
DTLS is not supported by tc-native.
Neither was the no-ssl3 buidl option used to produce the Windows binaries.
The client issues are also clearly not relevant.
That leaves three issues, all of which ap
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57455
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Stoeckmann ---
Totally fine with that approach!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
--- Comment #4 from Gregor Zurowski ---
No, is not needed, but I initially thought of a separate configuration option
for making the decision of whether to allow the null origin more explicit. This
also allows to control whether the default
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 01:47:08 2015
New Revision: 1653178
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653178
Log:
Clarify the handling of Copy message and Copy nodes.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractReplicatedMap.java
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 01:51:30 2015
New Revision: 1653179
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653179
Log:
Simplify the code.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractReplicatedMap.java
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractRepl
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 01:55:29 2015
New Revision: 1653180
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653180
Log:
Remove duplicated code.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractReplicatedMap.java
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/Abstrac
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 02:07:41 2015
New Revision: 1653181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653181
Log:
Copy node does not need to send the entry data.
It is enough to send only the node information of the entry.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractRepl
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 02:12:31 2015
New Revision: 1653182
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653182
Log:
Add changelog entry.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 02:23:21 2015
New Revision: 1653183
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653183
Log:
ReplicatedMap should send the Copy message when replicating.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractReplicatedMap.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-apr has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test-apr has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:05 2015
New Revision: 1653193
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653193
Log:
Fix behavior of ReplicatedMap when member has disappeared.
If map entry is primary, rebuild the backup members.
If primary node of map entry has disappeared, backup node is promoted to
pr
Am 20. Januar 2015 03:23:22 MEZ, schrieb kfuj...@apache.org:
>Author: kfujino
>Date: Tue Jan 20 02:23:21 2015
>New Revision: 1653183
>
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653183
>Log:
>ReplicatedMap should send the Copy message when replicating.
>
>Modified:
>tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribe
Author: kfujino
Date: Tue Jan 20 05:58:32 2015
New Revision: 1653198
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653198
Log:
Fix typos.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/AbstractReplicatedMap.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/tipis/LazyReplicatedMap.java
t
2015-01-20 14:39 GMT+09:00 Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de>:
>
>
> Am 20. Januar 2015 03:23:22 MEZ, schrieb kfuj...@apache.org:
> >Author: kfujino
> >Date: Tue Jan 20 02:23:21 2015
> >New Revision: 1653183
> >
> >URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653183
> >Log:
> >ReplicatedMap sho
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57420
--- Comment #6 from Violeta Georgieva ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #4)
> 1) As far as I see, UDecoder does not have any fields and thus is
> thread-safe.
>
> The thread safety is not documented, though.
>
> As such, I
55 matches
Mail list logo
