[Bug 54007] New: Improve handling of failed web application deployments

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54007 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 54007 Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org Summary: Improve handling of failed web application deployments Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

[Bug 54007] Improve handling of failed web application deployments

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54007 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko --- Created attachment 29477 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29477&action=edit 2011-11-14_tc6_54007.patch Patch for Tomcat 6 The change in ContainerBase.addChild() is neede

svn commit: r1398228 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: kkolinko Date: Mon Oct 15 09:18:59 2012 New Revision: 1398228 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398228&view=rev Log: Created an issue in bugzilla and uploaded the patch there. The patch is the same as proposed earlier (just combined two patches into one patch file), so no changes in

[Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 zhanqili changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connectors |Servlet & JSP API Version|7.

[Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Servlet & JSP API |Connectors Version|6.0.8

Re: [Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

On 15/10/2012 10:21, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 > > zhanqili changed: This idiot ^ has had their BZ account locked for messing about with this bug. I have restored the original values. Mark > >What|Removed

[Bug 54007] Improve handling of failed web application deployments

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54007 --- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko --- Concerns about the patch 1) Messy. The new methods have to be documented better and to be made protected instead of private. 2) Several concerns about getContextPathFromFileName() method: - It ne

svn commit: r1398251 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: kkolinko Date: Mon Oct 15 11:27:09 2012 New Revision: 1398251 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398251&view=rev Log: Revoke the proposal, due to issues listed in https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54007#c2 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomca

svn commit: r1398256 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Author: kkolinko Date: Mon Oct 15 12:06:28 2012 New Revision: 1398256 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398256&view=rev Log: Vote against WebSockets proposal and move it into the "stalled" section. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-taglibs-standard (in module tomcat-taglibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project tomcat-taglibs-standard has an issue affecting its community integration.

tagging 6.0.36 tomorrow morning

Hi, I have done all tests I plan to tag tomorrow morning (my morning). Comments? Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

[Bug 54010] New: Suggestion for code improvement (avoiding potential bug)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54010 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 54010 Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org Summary: Suggestion for code improvement (avoiding potential bug) Severity: normal Classification: Unclas