To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-taglibs-standard has an issue affecting its community
integration.
2012/10/5 Christopher Schultz :
> Konstantin,
>
> On 10/5/12 7:33 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: kkolinko
>> Date: Fri Oct 5 11:33:22 2012
>> New Revision: 1394452
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394452&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Followup to r1394343: Update javadoc for hasOp meth
2012/10/5 Christopher Schultz :
> Konstantin,
>
> On 10/5/12 8:45 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/10/4 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Thu Oct 4 14:55:59 2012
>>> New Revision: 1394104
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394104&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bu
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52055
--- Comment #17 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to comment #14)
The needCRLFParse fix was backported to 5.5 in r1359748 and will be in 5.5.36.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Oct 6 14:59:04 2012
New Revision: 1395081
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1395081&view=rev
Log:
Add changelog entry for r1359748
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webapps/docs/changel
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Oct 6 15:03:17 2012
New Revision: 1395086
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1395086&view=rev
Log:
Correction. The change for 1359748 was already mentioned, though it did not
have the bug number.
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webapps/docs/changelog.x
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Oct 6 15:44:12 2012
New Revision: 1395100
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1395100&view=rev
Log:
Remove bugtraq: properties that were added in r1388712.
Those properties are managed not here, but at the root of the project.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53960
--- Comment #1 from Brian Burch ---
I wondered whether my refactoring might have broken the logic associated with
processing the response body. I have reviewed my change, renamed an argument to
make it self-explanatory, and fixed a typo in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53960
Brian Burch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29443|0 |1
is obsolete|
On 30/09/12 23:46, Brian Burch wrote:
On 30/09/12 21:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/9/26 Brian Burch :
Thanks for all the help while I was developing the new test case for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53584. The thread
on the
users mailing list is called "Authenticator
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>2012/10/5 Christopher Schultz :
>> RFCs 2616, 2068, and 1945 all agree that method name is
>case-sensitive:
>> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec5.html#sec5.1.1
>>
>
>OK. Agreed.
>
>Looking at Servlet spec 2.5, SRV.3.1.1 says "The HTTP method is POST".
>
2012/10/6 Mark Thomas :
>
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>>2012/10/5 Christopher Schultz :
>
>>> RFCs 2616, 2068, and 1945 all agree that method name is
>>case-sensitive:
>>> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec5.html#sec5.1.1
>>>
>>
>>OK. Agreed.
>>
>>Looking at Servlet spec 2.5, SRV.3.
On 05.10.2012 15:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.5.36/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc5.5.x/tags/TOMCAT_5_5_36/
The proposed
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53977
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: 32bits isapi connector cannot work in wow64 mode
Severity: major
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Wi
14 matches
Mail list logo