To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-taglibs-standard has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Author: markt
Date: Thu Sep 20 09:55:04 2012
New Revision: 1387937
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1387937&view=rev
Log:
Correct fix for BZ 53843 that triggered a TCK failure
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/AsyncStateMachine.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coy
Author: markt
Date: Thu Sep 20 09:56:06 2012
New Revision: 1387938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1387938&view=rev
Log:
Correct fix for BZ 53843 that triggered a TCK failure
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/AsyncStateMach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53843
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
Actually, complete() is different (the TCK fails if we treat it the same way).
As soon as complete() is called , isAsyncStarted() must return false.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
Author: markt
Date: Thu Sep 20 10:46:53 2012
New Revision: 1387959
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1387959&view=rev
Log:
Sync with trunk
Modified:
tomcat/sandbox/trunk-resources/ (props changed)
tomcat/sandbox/trunk-resources/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/Tcp
On 18/09/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This thread is for tracking the remaining TODO items.
>>
>> An initial brain dump of to do items:
>>
>> 1. Run Tomcat 7 TCKs
>>a) To check they pass (minus the API tests which will fail)
JSP TCK passes.
Servlet
On 09/09/2012 19:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This is part of issue b) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>
>> The current DirContext implementation supports caching in most but not
>> all circumstances. It would be possible to insert a cache into th
2012/9/20 Mark Thomas :
> On 09/09/2012 19:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 09/09/2012 19:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> This is part of issue b) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>>
>>> The current DirContext implementation supports caching in most but not
>>> all circumstances. It would be pos
Jim,
On 7/25/12 7:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
>>
>> We should to tie up the remaining loose ends before 5.5.x is EOL. No
>> great ru
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>2012/9/20 Mark Thomas :
>> A simple JMeter test requesting the same static file over and over
>again
>> shows that the original DirContext implementation is around 5 times
>> faster than the new Resources implementation.
>>
>> I think the do we need caching question
10 matches
Mail list logo