https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51953
--- Comment #16 from Francis Galiegue 2011-10-07 13:53:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 27726
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27726
Tests for the NetMask class
Here are the first tests for this class. Only errors a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #1 from Nicholas Sushkin 2011-10-07
17:06:46 UTC ---
Regarding "Re: Should Form Authentication Valve restore request body on a
PUT?",
on Friday, October 07, 2011 10:13:00,
Christopher Schultz wrote to Tomcat Users List
> Nic
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #2 from Nicholas Sushkin 2011-10-07
17:40:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 27729
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27729
Patch fixing PUT handling with form authentication
Implemented Charles's suggestion
Author: markt
Date: Fri Oct 7 22:00:06 2011
New Revision: 1180261
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180261&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51952
Make inclusion of a response body for redirects optional as it may cause
issues and is only SHOULD in RFC2616.
Author: markt
Date: Fri Oct 7 22:08:28 2011
New Revision: 1180263
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180263&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51952
Make inclusion of a response body for redirects optional as it may cause issues
and is only SHOULD in RFC2616
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51952
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2011-10-07 22:31:07 UTC ---
Discussion on this topic within the Servlet EG can be followed here:
http://java.net/jira/browse/SERVLET_SPEC-27
Given that I am in favour of supporting protocol relative URLs, I
