Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]

2011-05-28 Thread Tim Whittington
> > There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhows, so I would propose we > start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. > > OK? +1 I could give RM a go if that works for ya'll - I've done a dry run already to find where everything goes. cheers tim

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51278] New: Unable to override default servlet other than in main web.xml

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51278 Bug #: 51278 Summary: Unable to override default servlet other than in main web.xml Product: Tomcat 7 Version: unspecified Platform: PC Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51278] Unable to override default servlet other than in main web.xml

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51278 Chris Beams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbe...@gmail.com OS/Version|

svn commit: r1128570 - in /tomcat/jk/trunk/tools: jkrelease.sh signfile.sh

2011-05-28 Thread timw
Author: timw Date: Sat May 28 08:46:59 2011 New Revision: 1128570 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1128570&view=rev Log: Adding ability to specify code signing key in release script, and failing release when tar fails (default BSD tar on OS X borks) Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/tools/jkrel

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51278] Unable to override default servlet other than in main web.xml

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51278 --- Comment #2 from Chris Beams 2011-05-28 09:56:11 UTC --- update: I've just tried this same ServletContainerInitializer scenario under Glassfish 3.1 and the override works as desired. This is especially interesting given that the catalin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51283] New: Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51283 Bug #: 51283 Summary: Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.12 Platform: All OS/Versi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51284] New: Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51284 Bug #: 51284 Summary: Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.29 Platform: All OS/Versi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51264] Context/Manager/Store configuration proposal

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #2 from Felix Schumacher 2011-05-28 14:34:24 UTC --- Created attachment 27084 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27084 Implements configuration option for jndi based DataSource. Implements configuration

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51283] Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51283 --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2011-05-28 15:14:09 UTC --- *** Bug 51284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51284] Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51284 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51283] Session Fixation is solved without an invalidating of an existing HTTP session

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51283 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2011-05-28 18:29:11 UTC --- Users can't place objects into the session. Only the application can do that. If the application is doing something that is security sensitive before authentication, I would class

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51274] Missing messages in PersistentManagerBase

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27074|0 |1 is patch|

svn commit: r1128752 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/session/LocalStrings.properties webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2011-05-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sat May 28 18:45:51 2011 New Revision: 1128752 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1128752&view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274 Add missing i18n strings in PersistentManagerBase. Patch provided by Eiji Takahashi. Modified: tomcat/tru

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51274] Missing messages in PersistentManagerBase

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33453] Jasper should recompile JSP files whose datestamps change in either direction (not just newer)

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 --- Comment #68 from Mark Thomas 2011-05-28 18:55:51 UTC --- Feedback on proposed TC7 patch: http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/mbjdpr4bvw6gzx62 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51240] maxConnections not honors config when acceptorThreadCount > 1

2011-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2011-05-28 19:25:54 UTC --- On reflection I decided to leave the acceptorThreadCount configuration option. It already defaults to one and since the acceptor thread does more the just call socket.accept() if t