DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51260] ALLOW_HTTP_SEPARATORS_IN_V0 not 100% reliable

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51240] maxConnections not honors config when acceptorThreadCount > 1

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2011-05-25 07:30:50 UTC --- I agree with Filip's comment re forcing acceptorThreadCount to 1 but I'd still like to get to the bottom of why the maxConnections limit isn't being enforced. I'll try and look at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43968] [patch] support ipv6 with mod_jk

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43968 --- Comment #3 from Eiji Takahashi 2011-05-25 09:01:07 UTC --- Created attachment 27058 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27058 patch for 1.2.30 Patch for 1.2.30. I did only an easy connection test. <> worker.ajp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43968] [patch] support ipv6 with mod_jk

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43968 --- Comment #4 from Eiji Takahashi 2011-05-25 09:01:43 UTC --- Created attachment 27059 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27059 patch for trunk Patch for trunk. I did only an easy connection test. <> worker.ajp1.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51240] maxConnections not honors config when acceptorThreadCount > 1

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240 --- Comment #3 from Tim Whittington 2011-05-25 10:37:48 UTC --- It looks like there's a race condition between the acceptor thread being permitted to accept a connection and updating the connection counter. Two acceptor threads can pass t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51264] New: Context/Manager/Store configuration proposal

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 Bug #: 51264 Summary: Context/Manager/Store configuration proposal Product: Tomcat 7 Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW S

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51264] Context/Manager/Store configuration proposal

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Mark

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51260] ALLOW_HTTP_SEPARATORS_IN_V0 not 100% reliable

2011-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260 --- Comment #3 from Dan Checkoway 2011-05-25 12:47:17 UTC --- Mark, from an efficiency standpoint alone, I still think those logical conditions should be reordered in the code (i.e. don't bother invoking isHttpToken if separators are allow