DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51116] stopped virtual host replies with 400 Bad Request

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-04-26 03:34:35 EDT --- 1. Isn't it already fixed by bug 50734? - will be in 6.0.33. 2. It is hard to accept patches submitted elsewhere, because of licensing issues. The proper way is to attach

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51117] stopped deployment or virtual host reply with error 503

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50734] 400 Bad Request when there are no web applications deployed on Tomcat 6.0.32

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50734 jfclere changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akostadi...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 fro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51116] stopped virtual host replies with 400 Bad Request

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 jfclere changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51119] New: extras - JmxRemoteLifecycleListener does not support JAAS based authentication and authorisation

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 Summary: extras - JmxRemoteLifecycleListener does not support JAAS based authentication and authorisation Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.32 Platform: All OS/Version: All

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51119] extras - JmxRemoteLifecycleListener does not support JAAS based authentication and authorisation

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Mark

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51120] New: Nullpointer exception in CoyoteAdapter when the Client disconnects the socket abruptly.

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51120 Summary: Nullpointer exception in CoyoteAdapter when the Client disconnects the socket abruptly. Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.12 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51119] extras - JmxRemoteLifecycleListener does not support JAAS based authentication and authorisation

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #2 from Neil laurance 2011-04-26 05:32:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26934) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26934) Diff from tc-trunk - changes JmxRemoteLifecycleListener only -- Configure bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51119] extras - JmxRemoteLifecycleListener does not support JAAS based authentication and authorisation

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #3 from Neil laurance 2011-04-26 05:36:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Enhancement requests with proposed patches tend to get addressed more quickly > than those without. Apologies, didn't have time to add my patch befor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51119] extras - JmxRemoteLifecycleListener does not support JAAS based authentication and authorisation

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #4 from Neil laurance 2011-04-26 05:40:49 EDT --- Properties to verify this is working: -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.login.config=Tomc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48358] JSP-unloading reloaded

2011-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48358 --- Comment #20 from Christian Brandel 2011-04-26 10:22:35 EDT --- Konstantin: there is no typo. At least for Tomcat Version 7.0.12 it's not getStrAsCharArray but genStringAsCharArray. The only occurrence of the string "getStrAsCharArray"

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/4/11 Mladen Turk: Hi, I plan to create a sandbox/connectors/native/iis7 for a native IIS7 C++ connector (since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI) Any objections? I do not mind. Though 1) Do you need th

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-26 Thread Mladen Turk
On 04/26/2011 05:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: +1, but maybe as Konstantin noted just a simple top-level sandbox name like iis7 or connector-iis7 is enough. You can create any needed structure underneath. I think there's no real need to group sandboxes. O

Re: svn commit: r1094069 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/ java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/ java/org/apache/catalina/manager/ java/org/apache/catalina/session/ webapps/docs/

2011-04-26 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 4/21/2011 8:00 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 19/04/2011 16:27, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: On 4/18/2011 4:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 18/04/2011 10:13, Remy Maucherat wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:25 +, ma...@apache.org wrote: Author: markt Date: Sat Apr 16 22:25:28 2011 New Revisio

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? Le 26 avr. 2011 à 17:12, Rainer Jung a écrit : > On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: >> On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> 2011/4/11 Mladen Turk: Hi,