On 24.01.2011 22:51, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
- MD5 OK
- si
2011/1/25 jean-frederic clere :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
> tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
> [x] Beta
That is because of issue observed with Nio connector.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50648
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 06:17:20
EST ---
@Mark
Sorry about that. I'll file seperate entries and will try to match the style.
(In reply to comment #2)
> 2.
> What type of exceptions have you seen here?
> Reply faile
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
Summary: Tribes | RpcChannel | Add a callback for cases when an
error occured sending a reply to an RP call
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 06:57:27
EST ---
Reproducing comments from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50648:
Filip Hanik wrote:
> 2.
> What type of exceptions have you seen here?
> Reply failed callb
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50670
Summary: Tribes | RpcChannel | Add option to specify external
class loaders to support custom message classes
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: A
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50670
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 08:46:47
EST ---
Reproducing comments from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50648:
Filip Hanik wrote:
> 3.
> The external loaders IMHO don't belong here.
> For the applicatio
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50670
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 08:47:54
EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26560)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26560)
svn diff
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 08:49:08
EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26561)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26561)
svn diff
CAVEAT: this proposal modifies the RpcCallback interface. RpcCallba
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50648
--- Comment #4 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 08:50:53
EST ---
Filed separe enhancement requests:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667 (replyFailed)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50670 (class loader
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2011-01-27 08:41:35 EST ---
Looking at the KeepAliveCache more closely, the currently solution is the wrong
approach. Because the thread only exists for as long as it is needed and is
re-created as necessary
On 01/27/2011 10:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/25 jean-frederic clere:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[x] Beta
That is be
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673
Summary: Error when stopping Tomcat using services.msc
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.6
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Pac
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
Summary: Some maven pom improvments
Product: Taglibs
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
--- Comment #1 from olamy 2011-01-27 11:06:34 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26562)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26562)
taglibs parent patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userpre
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
--- Comment #2 from olamy 2011-01-27 11:07:10 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26563)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26563)
taglibs standard patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
--- Comment #1 from Konst
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50651
--- Comment #10 from Filip Hanik 2011-01-27 11:24:16 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created an attachment (id=26557)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26557) [details]
> 2011-01-27_tc6_50651_CoyoteAdapter.patch
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from Filip H
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jan 27 16:38:08 2011
New Revision: 1064187
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1064187&view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=106
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from Mark Th
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 27 16:44:32 2011
New Revision: 1064189
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1064189&view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=10641
All,
Today's (duplicate) bug report about held references in JSTL tags has me
thinking. What is the resistance to "fixing" the problem of object
retention in these tags?
JSP 1.8.2 says that all page-scoped objects are released after the
response is written or the request is forwarded to another h
On 27/01/2011 16:54, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> I'd love to hear some comments.
It is a simple trade-off.
Enable pooling, use more memory, have less GC
vs
Disable pooling, use less memory, have more GC
The memory/GC required will vary depending on which tags are used and
how they are used. I t
On 01/22/2011 11:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz
2011-01-27 12:43:04 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26564)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26564)
Servlet that should trigger this thread to be created
It's ugly, but it
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
--- Comment #4 from Olivier Costet 2011-01-27 12:55:27
EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I still don't understand this enhancement. What is the possibly use case for
> implementing replyFailed.
> The callback method replyFailed would get
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
Olivier Costet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
Configure bugmail: https:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> ...
> I'd love to hear some comments.
Some additional background:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33934
I haven't looked at the patch, so I'm not sure exactly how that got solved...
--
Kris Schneider
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-01-27
13:22:23 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26566)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26566)
Alternative implementation of the servlet
Alternative implementation of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
Configure bugmail: ht
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jan 27 18:43:18 2011
New Revision: 1064252
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1064252&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50651
Fix NPE in InternalNioOutputBuffer.recycle().
- Do not throw NPE when recycle() is called more than once.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50651
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jan 27 18:58:55 2011
New Revision: 1064254
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1064254&view=rev
Log:
Followup to r1061433
Be consistent with locks on sessionCreationTiming, sessionExpirationTiming
in DeltaManager.resetStatistics(): use the same lock as elsewhere.
Modi
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jan 27 19:06:19 2011
New Revision: 1064257
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1064257&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
Include context name in reload and stop log statements.
Based on the patch by Marc Guillemot.
Modified:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 27 19:43:23 2011
New Revision: 1064275
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1064275&view=rev
Log:
Typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/jasper-howto.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/jasper-howto.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50631
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
--- Comment #1 from Konst
2011/1/27 jean-frederic clere :
> On 01/27/2011 10:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> 2011/1/25 jean-frederic clere:
>>>
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
>>>
>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build correspondi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664
balusc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change
notification.
The "PoweredBy" page has been changed by andy smith.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy?action=diff&rev1=304&rev2=305
--
=== Dere
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz
2011-01-27 16:44:21 EST ---
I am in favor of using the context's WebappClassLoader when configuring a JNDI
DataSource defined in context.xml.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzill
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
--- Comment #5 from Filip Hanik 2011-01-27 16:49:01 EST ---
Hi Olivier, yes, I see the use case. I do have a different suggestion for the
solution, as there is a significant change.
I'm attaching a patch with the summary of
1. Not breaki
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
--- Comment #6 from Filip Hanik 2011-01-27 16:50:07 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26567)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26567)
Patch to include replyFailed functionality
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664
--- Comment #3 from Filip Hanik 2011-01-27 17:08:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am in favor of using the context's WebappClassLoader when configuring a JNDI
> DataSource defined in context.xml.
Yes, but this can cause problems whe
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-01-27
17:14:01 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am in favor of using the context's WebappClassLoader when configuring a JNDI
> DataSource defined in context.xml.
Note, that context.xml is be
2011/1/22 Jim Jagielski :
> [x] Stable
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Summary: Allow system property variables in catalina.properties
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
--- Comment #1 from Jim Riggs 2011-01-27 20:56:03 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26568)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26568)
Proposal A
Substitute on retrieval.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
--- Comment #2 from Jim Riggs 2011-01-27 20:56:37 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26569)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26569)
Proposal B
Substitute on initialization.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.ap
It also interacts with tag reinitialization as described here:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49589
in that we hang on to the value when the tag is in the pool only to clear it
when we use it.
I think there are other optimizations that could be done to forEach but have
On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Kris Schneider wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>> ...
>> I'd love to hear some comments.
>
> Some additional background:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33934
>
> I haven't looked at the patch, so I'm not
57 matches
Mail list logo
