DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50518] jps.exe and jvisualvm.exe cannot detect tomcat using jdk1.6.0_23

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 Martin Kuba changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50518] jps.exe and jvisualvm.exe cannot detect tomcat using jdk1.6.0_23

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 --- Comment #3 from Jess Holle 2010-12-30 09:06:07 EST --- A very short investigation shows the issue. 1) Tomcat specifies -Djava.io.tmpdir=$CATALINA_BASE/temp in its JVM options. 2) Java 6 Update 23 places the hsperfdata_$USER directory i

Re: svn commit: r1051539 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/CounterLatch.java

2010-12-30 Thread sebb
On 29 December 2010 02:17, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > > > On 12/28/2010 5:02 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 22 December 2010 16:04, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12/21/2010 7:29 PM, sebb wrote: > > -    private long signal; > +    private volatile long signal;

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50518] jps.exe and jvisualvm.exe cannot detect tomcat using jdk1.6.0_23

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 --- Comment #4 from Mark Eggers 2010-12-30 14:51:11 EST --- I briefly tested a temporary work-around. Launch visualvm as follows: visualvm -J-Djava.io.tmpdir=(Tomcat temp directory) There are some caveats. The user running visualvm has t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50518] jps.exe and jvisualvm.exe cannot detect tomcat using jdk1.6.0_23

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 --- Comment #5 from Mark Eggers 2010-12-30 15:04:37 EST --- This looks like fallout from the following: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6938627 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab

Re: svn commit: r1051539 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/CounterLatch.java

2010-12-30 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.12.2010 15:28, sebb wrote: On 29 December 2010 02:17, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: On 12/28/2010 5:02 PM, sebb wrote: On 22 December 2010 16:04, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists On 12/21/2010 7:29 PM, sebb wrote: It would be cheaper to make it final as it's only ever set in the ctor and is im

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50518] jps.exe and jvisualvm.exe cannot detect tomcat using jdk1.6.0_23

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 --- Comment #6 from Pid 2010-12-30 16:23:56 EST --- We can close this issue then, as this is a Java problem and not Tomcat specific? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receivin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50518] jps.exe and jvisualvm.exe cannot detect tomcat using jdk1.6.0_23

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-12-30 16:24:33 EST --- Thank you for your investigation. Looks like something that we cannot fix, but we may mention it in RELEASE-NOTES, or on the FAQ page on the Wiki site (editable by everyon

Re: svn commit: r1051539 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/CounterLatch.java

2010-12-30 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Doug Lea also has information here: http://g.oswego.edu/dl/jmm/cookbook.html and Intel's doc is here: http://download.intel.com/design/processor/manuals/253668.pdf Section 8 has the info on the memory model. However, as the value is immutable and only set in the constructor, IMO fi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27717] very slow in JSTL 1.1

2010-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27717 Jeremy Boynes changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26448|0 |1 is obsolete|

[taglibs] Refactoring XPath support

2010-12-30 Thread Jeremy Boynes
I've added a patch to #27717 that changes the XML tags to use Xalan's low-level API directly. This addresses: 1) Most of the performance issues with iteration from #27717 2) Support for position() and last() from #22765 and others 3) Support for using the same variable twice from #49578 which basi