Author: markt
Date: Fri Dec 10 09:47:05 2010
New Revision: 1044255
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044255&view=rev
Log:
Fix FindBugs / unused code warnings
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/DefaultServlet.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/serv
Author: markt
Date: Fri Dec 10 10:06:44 2010
New Revision: 1044264
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044264&view=rev
Log:
Missed file in r1044255
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/LocalStrings.properties
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/Loc
Author: markt
Date: Fri Dec 10 10:11:38 2010
New Revision: 1044266
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044266&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413
Ensure 304s are not returned when using static files as error pages
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
Summary: Apache Server Dont Start
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.20
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
Assigne
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vaghela_shreya...@yahoo.com
OS/Vers
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
Summary: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Exception filling
buffer with data from underlying input stream: not an
EAGAIN status, so perhaps disconnected client?
Product: Tomcat 5
Author: markt
Date: Fri Dec 10 13:54:16 2010
New Revision: 1044359
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044359&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50448
Regression caused by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1036281
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/j
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50448
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Thiébaud
2010-12-10 09:03:24 EST ---
I confirm the patch works for me as well.
thanks
Christophe
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
Summary: Multiple X-Forwarded-For headers not handled by
RemoteIP valve
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.29
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
brett.dellegra...@intact-is.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brett.dellegra...@
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
--- Comment #1 from Jim Riggs 2010-12-10 09:39:04 EST ---
This is due to RemoteIpValve's use of request.getHeader() rather than the
enumeration from request.getHeaders(). I'll try to whip up a patch...
--
Configure bugmail: https://issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung 2010-12-10 10:19:00
EST ---
I think there is no given standard concerning whether the first or the last
header is the "right" one (coming from the closest proxy). The same for a
comma-separated multi-valued
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas 2010-12-10 10:46:07 EST ---
RFC2616 is clear on how headers should be combined so order is retained. In
short
...
X-Forwarded-For : A, B
...
X-Forwarded-For : C
...
X-Forwarded-For : D, E
must be treated exa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Preißer 2010-12-10 10:57:33 EST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the report. This has been fixed in 7.0.x and will be included in
> 7.0.6 onwards.
Thanks :)
I would like to note that the same behav
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
Summary: Jasper don't detects changes in jsp file if we load de
jsp and after we modify the jsp in the same second
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.5
Platform: All
OS/Versi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
--- Comment #1 from Alejandro Anadon 2010-12-10 13:22:51 EST
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> If we have a jsp file (not in a war file; just directly in the file system)
> then we first call the jsp; then it is compiled and executed.
> But i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz
2010-12-10 14:40:29 EST ---
So, should the RemoteIPValve/Filter should be looking at the first
X-Forwarded-For (A) or the last X-Forwarded-For (E) address?
It sounds like the reporter was expecting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
--- Comment #5 from William A. Rowe Jr. 2010-12-10 15:24:59
EST ---
Rainer, the spec is absolutely clear about precidence, the last (rightmost)
value is added by the nearest adjacent proxy to the server agent. Ergo, the
first (leftmost) v
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50453
--- Comment #6 from Jim Riggs 2010-12-10 16:48:05 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> So, should the RemoteIPValve/Filter should be looking at the first
> X-Forwarded-For (A) or the last X-Forwarded-For (E) address?
Chris -
It should be lo
23 matches
Mail list logo