On 06/30/2010 05:20 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/6/29 jean-frederic clere :
>> Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
>> release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
>> are cheap we would like to abandon 6.0.27 and propose the vote for 6.0
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 30 08:46:50 2010
New Revision: 959233
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959233&view=rev
Log:
Re-factor to make upcoming changes easier to understand
Added:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/el/TesterBeanBB.java
- copied, changed from r959061,
tomcat/trunk/tes
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49511
--- Comment #1 from Attila Király 2010-06-30
05:51:56 EDT ---
The problem could be reproduced with IIS 6.0 too (32 bit).
The workaround, disabling keep-alive, solves the logging problem on both
versions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49528
Pieter Libin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pie...@emweb.be
--
Configure bugma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49528
Summary: HttpServletRequest.isAsyncStarted() returns false when
a Runnable is started
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49523
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Jung 2010-06-30 07:03:47
EDT ---
The application list in the manager webapp simply lists all known contexts. The
link provided for each context is a convenience link for an admin to jump into
the respective conte
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49530
Summary: Context is not correctly stopped at shutdown
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49530
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Frey 2010-06-30
10:10:24 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25670)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25670)
Source code of the test servlet
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.or
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49530
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Frey 2010-06-30
10:12:25 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25671)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25671)
Log file with LifecycleBase logger on FINE level
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Hi guys, sorry for the bother. I do have a question related to how a certain
feature was implemented in Tomcat (6.0, probably
all of them), that's why I address the question to the dev-list and the
user-list.
I do have a fairly complicated case, in which I have a filter for jsp's, and I
use a
Hi,
What you write means that the freshly release Tomcat 7 doesn't fully
implement Servlet API 3.0, isn't it?
Interesting to see that nobody reacts :-(
Cheers,
Marc.
Peter Roßbach wrote:
Hi!
I detected some Todo's at AsyncContext
- AsyncContext.createListener
We don't make a resourc
On 30/06/2010 15:23, Ranjix R wrote:
Cross posting to both lists isn't usually a good idea.
p
> Hi guys, sorry for the bother. I do have a question related to how a certain
> feature was implemented in Tomcat (6.0, probably
> all of them), that's why I address the question to the dev-list and
2010/6/30 Marc Guillemot :
> Hi,
>
> What you write means that the freshly release Tomcat 7 doesn't fully
> implement Servlet API 3.0, isn't it?
>
1. It was released as Beta
2. It passes TCK
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To
Author: jim
Date: Wed Jun 30 16:44:43 2010
New Revision: 959371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959371&view=rev
Log:
Unix rev's... mostly for pre and post efforts. Still
need Windoze to build the releases.
Added:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/build/sign.sh (with props)
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk
Author: jim
Date: Wed Jun 30 16:46:43 2010
New Revision: 959372
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959372&view=rev
Log:
some votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=959
On 30/06/2010 17:01, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi,
What you write means that the freshly release Tomcat 7 doesn't fully
implement Servlet API 3.0, isn't it?
Interesting to see that nobody reacts :-(
If you were following the dev list you would have seen that
Jean-Frederic has already vetoed the
Hi Marc,
Am 30.06.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 30/06/2010 17:01, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi,
What you write means that the freshly release Tomcat 7 doesn't fully
implement Servlet API 3.0, isn't it?
Interesting to see that nobody reacts :-(
If you were following the dev list you wo
On 30/06/2010 21:23, Peter Roßbach wrote:
Hi Marc,
Am 30.06.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 30/06/2010 17:01, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi,
What you write means that the freshly release Tomcat 7 doesn't fully
implement Servlet API 3.0, isn't it?
Interesting to see that nobody reacts :-(
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Jun 30 20:43:36 2010
New Revision: 959428
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959428&view=rev
Log:
Arrange filter logic. Back port of r958911.
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Ht
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49531
Summary: singlesignon failover not working on
DeltaManager/cluster upon shutdown
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.26
Platform: HP
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37449
--- Comment #4 from Bruno Braga 2010-06-30 17:53:45 EDT ---
>From 2005 to now, is there any plan to implement it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37449
--- Comment #6 from Chuck Caldarale 2010-06-30
18:25:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> From 2005 to now, is there any plan to implement it?
Looks like it's already implemented, if you'd care to move up:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37449
Bruno Braga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bgbr...@gmail.com
Summary
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49534
Summary: ForEachSupport handles unsupported items
inconsistently
Product: Taglibs
Version: 1.2.0
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49534
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Boynes 2010-07-01 01:04:26 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=25674)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25674)
Patch to throw exception on invalid items in deferred expression
This patch a
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> In bug 45197 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45197 Henri
> wrote:
> * Look at questions in the length method in ForEachSupport.java
> * Look at commented out code in prepre in ForEachSupport.java
>
> By "in the length met
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49534
Henri Yandell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: bayard
Date: Thu Jul 1 06:15:44 2010
New Revision: 959527
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959527&view=rev
Log:
Adding an exception when the type is not recognized in determineLengthAndType;
and removing some unused variables/commented out lines in the prepare method.
Thanks to Jer
I am highly interessed why does my fix is wrong :-)
Is my fix really wrong, you can revert my checkin. Today I present the
new Tomcat 7 release at Java User Forum Stuttgart (Germany).
Many thanks,
Peter
Am 01.07.2010 um 08:20 schrieb jean-frederic clere:
On 06/30/2010 09:15 PM, Peter Roßb
29 matches
Mail list logo
