https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #1 from Mladen Turk 2010-02-27 08:26:44 UTC ---
Right I can confirm the regression.
We'll withdraw 1.2.29 and immediately release 1.2.30
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 08:42:34 2010
New Revision: 916928
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916928&view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ48826. We did not set Content-Lenght header name, only value which causes
core caused by unset pointer
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c
Hi,
We have a bug with IIS/1.2.29 which makes it unusable and it
crashes the IIS.
I'll tag the 1.2.30 and make immediate vote/release because
it's a serious regression.
I suppose we would need to withdraw 1.2.29 as well
Regards
--
^TM
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #2 from Mladen Turk 2010-02-27 08:51:59 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=25064)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25064)
1.2.30-dev for x64
Could you confirm this version is OK before I tag 1.2.30
I ha
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 09:04:31 2010
New Revision: 916931
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916931&view=rev
Log:
Prepare for a tag
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_version.h
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_version.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/j
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 09:42:19 2010
New Revision: 916933
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916933&view=rev
Log:
Remove references to the bogus 1.2.29
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/news/20100101.xml
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
U
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 09:51:52 2010
New Revision: 916934
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916934&view=rev
Log:
Add a withdrawn notice
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/news/20100101.xml
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/news/20100101.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/jk
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
New Revision: 916938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938&view=rev
Log:
Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/news/20100101.xml
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xd
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 10:36:05 2010
New Revision: 916939
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916939&view=rev
Log:
Tag 1.2.30
Added:
tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_30/
- copied from r916938, tomcat/jk/trunk/
-
To uns
Hi,
We have one serious bug with 1.2.29 that causes IIS to
crash on POST request.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
Other web connectors are not affected by that bug
Please test the provided release so we can replace the
existing 1.2.29 ASAP.
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/
On 24/02/2010 10:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
PGP signatures all match
Key in web of trust
.exe instal
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
2010/2/27 :
> Author: mturk
> Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
> New Revision: 916938
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938&view=rev
> Log:
> Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
>
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
--
+1
On 02/27/2010 01:02 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
New Revision: 916938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938&view=rev
Log:
Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
It
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #3 from Mladen Turk 2010-02-27 12:15:58 UTC ---
Use the version from
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win64/jk-1.2.30/
That contains a fixed version
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.or
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48827
Summary: Error validating empty tag that contains jsp:attribute
in JSP documents in XML syntax
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.24
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48827
--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-02-27
13:11:12 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=25066)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25066)
emptyTagWithAttribute_Jsp.jsp
The same page in plain JSP syntax. It work
On 27.02.2010 13:02, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
New Revision: 916938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938&view=rev
Log:
Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
+1
--
2010/2/24 jean-frederic clere :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
> [x] Broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48827
Showstopper.
By the way: I have not a
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 13:25:58 2010
New Revision: 916952
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916952&view=rev
Log:
Add 1.2.29 IIS notice
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
URL:
http://svn.ap
2010/2/27 Mladen Turk :
> +1
>
>>
>> If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
>>
> It does. Same as for release.
> It's been only a day since announced, so as soon
> we remove it and release 1.2.30 with fix we'll
> make less users angry.
Announcement can be sent faster than any testing for RC c
On 02/27/2010 02:28 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27 Mladen Turk:
+1
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
It does. Same as for release.
It's been only a day since announced, so as soon
we remove it and release 1.2.30 with fix we'll
make less users angry.
Announcement can be
On 27.02.2010 15:16, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/27/2010 02:28 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27 Mladen Turk:
+1
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
It does. Same as for release.
It's been only a day since announced, so as soon
we remove it and release 1.2.30 with fix we'll
make
On 02/27/2010 03:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just made an notice on tomcat index.html
Should be enough thought.
I'll also add the same notice to README.html files
inside binaries/
Shouldn't we also remove the 29 files form dist and archive?
Once when the vote is done.
I'd rather see it repl
On 27.02.2010 15:54, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just made an notice on tomcat index.html
Should be enough thought.
I'll also add the same notice to README.html files
inside binaries/
Shouldn't we also remove the 29 files form dist and archive?
Once when
On 02/27/2010 04:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 27.02.2010 15:54, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just made an notice on tomcat index.html
Should be enough thought.
I'll also add the same notice to README.html files
inside binaries/
Shouldn't we also remove the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48813
Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25055|0 |1
is obsolete
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #4 from Bruce G. Stewart 2010-02-27 21:21:30
UTC ---
This one works for all the cases I had available to throw at it, with any of
the three tomcat apr processors.
Thanks so much for fixing this so quickly.
The only oddity I
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 is:
>
> [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
> [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
> [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
I don't test with II
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Jung 2010-02-27 22:21:26
UTC ---
I assume there are not other info, warn or error log messages directly around
those cited. In this case I only found two possible reasons, both detected in
ajp_process_callback():
30 matches
Mail list logo
