Re: svn commit: r895700 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2010/1/4 : >> Author: rjung >> Date: Mon Jan 4 16:58:04 2010 >> New Revision: 895700 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895700&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix apr version test i tcnative trunk. >> >> Modified: >>tomcat/native/trunk/native/b

Re: [tcnative] slight apr and openssl version confusion

2010-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/04/2010 06:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > What is the use of the file > >native/srclib/VERSIONS > > in tcnative? > > Ib the 1.1.x branch it contains the info: > > = > Use the following version of the libraries > > - APR 1.2.8, http://apr.apache.or

Re: [tcnative] slight apr and openssl version confusion

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2010 09:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure and doesn't need to be in repository. This file is more like a README. It says which version is recommended/required for the builds. Regards -- ^TM -

svn commit: r895964 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

2010-01-05 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Jan 5 09:46:35 2010 New Revision: 895964 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895964&view=rev Log: Fix credts for patch. Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

svn propchange: r895731 - svn:log

2010-01-05 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Revision: 895731 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Tue Jan 5 09:49:32 2010 -- --- svn:log (original) +++ svn:log Tue Jan 5 09:49:32 2010 @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ r890720 plus this addition is identi

svn propchange: r895733 - svn:log

2010-01-05 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Revision: 895733 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Tue Jan 5 09:50:10 2010 -- --- svn:log (original) +++ svn:log Tue Jan 5 09:50:10 2010 @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ r890720 plus this addition is identi

Re: svn commit: r894577 - /tomcat/trunk/conf/web.xml

2010-01-05 Thread Mark Thomas
On 05/01/2010 00:17, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > The xsi:schemaLocation attribute above is wrong. It should be a pair of URLs. Fixed. Thanks. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional comm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48129] [PATCH] Fix build with OpenSSL 1.0.0-beta3

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48129 Rainer Jung changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

svn commit: r895967 - in /tomcat/trunk: conf/web.xml webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml webapps/docs/WEB-INF/web.xml webapps/examples/WEB-INF/web.xml webapps/host-manager/WEB-INF/web.xml webapps/manager/WEB

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 09:51:45 2010 New Revision: 895967 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895967&view=rev Log: Fix schema location Modified: tomcat/trunk/conf/web.xml tomcat/trunk/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/WEB-INF/web.xml tomcat/trunk/web

svn commit: r895968 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Jan 5 09:53:36 2010 New Revision: 895968 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895968&view=rev Log: Fix wrong index in APR version number check. Modified: tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4 Modified: tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4 URL: http:/

Re: svn commit: r895700 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.01.2010 08:59, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/1/4: Author: rjung Date: Mon Jan 4 16:58:04 2010 New Revision: 895700 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895700&view=rev Log: Fix apr version test i tcnative trunk. Modified: tomcat/

Re: [tcnative] slight apr and openssl version confusion

2010-01-05 Thread Rainer Jung
On 05.01.2010 10:04, Mladen Turk wrote: On 01/05/2010 09:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure and doesn't need to be in repository. This file is more like a README. It says which version is recommended/required for the builds

Re: [tcnative] slight apr and openssl version confusion

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2010 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 05.01.2010 10:04, Mladen Turk wrote: On 01/05/2010 09:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure and doesn't need to be in repository. This file is more like a README. It says which ve

Re: svn commit: r895700 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/1/5 Rainer Jung : > On 05.01.2010 08:59, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >> On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> >>> 2010/1/4: Author: rjung Date: Mon Jan  4 16:58:04 2010 New Revision: 895700 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895700&view=rev >>

Tomcat Native 1.1.19 pre-release

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, I've build the 1.1.19 pre-release http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/ It is build from 1.1.x branch using the revision 859968 If no one finds any problems with that, I'll tag the 1.1.19 in few hours and create a full release with vote proposal. Regards -- ^TM

Re: svn commit: r895700 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2010 11:23 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/1/5 Rainer Jung: Konstantin: JFC is right, it was meant to also check against the third part of the minimum apr version "1 . 3 . 3". By the way: you should check the third number only if the second one is equal to "3". The simplest wo

svn commit: r895981 - /tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tomcat/

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 10:53:36 2010 New Revision: 895981 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895981&view=rev Log: Remove empty dirs Removed: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tomcat/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

svn commit: r895983 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tomcat/

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 10:54:53 2010 New Revision: 895983 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895983&view=rev Log: When moving cookie test case to correct package, should also have removed empty dirs Removed: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tomcat/ -

svn commit: r895984 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Jan 5 10:57:52 2010 New Revision: 895984 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895984&view=rev Log: Get rid of nested version test by formatting version number as one big decimal. Modified: tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4 Modified: tomcat/native/trunk/na

Re: svn commit: r895984 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2010 11:57 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung Get rid of nested version test by formatting version number as one big decimal. + decimal_apr_version=`printf %02d%02d%03d ${1} ${2} ${3}` + if test "${decimal_apr_version}" -lt "0101003"; then You should not quote the arithmetic

Re: svn commit: r895700 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 01/05/2010 11:23 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > > 2010/1/5 Rainer Jung: > > > > > > > > Konstantin: JFC is right, it was meant to also check against the third > part > > > of the minimum apr version "1 . 3 . 3". > > > > > > > > > > By the way: you should c

svn commit: r895994 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh

2010-01-05 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 11:36:32 2010 New Revision: 895994 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895994&view=rev Log: Make sure the win32 source dist has all the parts like .tar.gz version (with CRLF and -configure) Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh Modified: tomca

Re: svn commit: r895700 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > > On 01/05/2010 11:23 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > > > > 2010/1/5 Rainer Jung: > > > > > > > > > > > Konstantin: JFC is right, it was meant to also check against the third > > part > > > > of the minimum apr version "1

svn commit: r895998 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh

2010-01-05 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 11:39:27 2010 New Revision: 895998 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895998&view=rev Log: Fix copy/pase typo Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/

Re: svn commit: r895984 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/build/tcnative.m4

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 01/05/2010 11:57 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote: > > > Author: rjung > > Get rid of nested version test by formatting > > version number as one big decimal. > > > > + decimal_apr_version=`printf %02d%02d%03d ${1} ${2} ${3}` > > + if test "${decimal_apr_version}

Re: svn commit: r895998 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh

2010-01-05 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Mladen, I seem to remember that the fix line ends perl script is part of the tcnative repos. Regards, Rainer On 05.01.2010 12:39, mt...@apache.org wrote: Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 11:39:27 2010 New Revision: 895998 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895998&view=rev Log: Fix cop

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48488] New: accepCount does not limit connections

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488 Summary: accepCount does not limit connections Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.20 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] New: Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 Summary: Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes. Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #1 from VickyKak 2010-01-05 05:21:45 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24795) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24795) Proposed Fix. I did try the patch here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trun

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #2 from VickyKak 2010-01-05 05:23:24 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24796) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24796) sample test application. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #3 from VickyKak 2010-01-05 05:29:48 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24797) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24797) Bug48489.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #4 from VickyKak 2010-01-05 05:30:26 UTC --- Bug48489.patch is the required fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are th

Re: svn commit: r895998 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2010 01:34 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, I seem to remember that the fix line ends perl script is part of the tcnative repos. Which requires perl, so chicken and egg problem again. Probably could be used if the unix2dos is not found and perl exists. Regards -- ^TM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #5 from Filip Hanik 2010-01-05 05:54:58 UTC --- couldn't you just use -Dsun.lang.ClassLoader.allowArraySyntax=true -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving thi

svn commit: r896039 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh

2010-01-05 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 13:57:56 2010 New Revision: 896039 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896039&view=rev Log: Use our lineends.pl script instead unix2dos utility Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh URL: htt

Re: svn commit: r895998 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2010 01:34 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, I seem to remember that the fix line ends perl script is part of the tcnative repos. Done. After second thought the perl is more likely to be present then unix2dos. Regards -- ^TM

svn commit: r896052 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native/include/tcn_version.h

2010-01-05 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 14:11:59 2010 New Revision: 896052 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896052&view=rev Log: Prepare for 1.1.19 tag Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native/include/tcn_version.h Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native/include/tcn_version.h URL: ht

svn commit: r896054 - /tomcat/native/tags/TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_19/

2010-01-05 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 14:12:24 2010 New Revision: 896054 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896054&view=rev Log: Tag 1.1.19 Added: tomcat/native/tags/TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_19/ (props changed) - copied from r896053, tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/ Propchange: tomcat/native/tags/

svn commit: r896069 - in /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native: include/tcn_version.h os/win32/libtcnative.rc

2010-01-05 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Jan 5 14:43:18 2010 New Revision: 896069 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896069&view=rev Log: Advance version to 1.1.20-dev Modified: tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native/include/tcn_version.h tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native/os/win32/libtcnative.rc Modif

[VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Native 1.1.19 is available for testing. Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building against OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me before the tag :) If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be downloaded from: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #6 from VickyKak 2010-01-05 08:30:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > couldn't you just use > > -Dsun.lang.ClassLoader.allowArraySyntax=true I don't see it useful, here is the related bug http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #7 from Kris Schneider 2010-01-05 08:41:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6434149 That bug, as well as others, implies that your JSP code is wrong. Instead of this: loader.loadClass(

Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in StandardContext.createWrapper()

2010-01-05 Thread David Jencks
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote: No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed. We've experienced similar issues integrating lots of third party libraries (Tomcat being one of them) into our OSGi runtime. Thanks for your input.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48414] Use of Class.forName may not work well in osgi environment

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414 david jencks changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24737|0 |1 is obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48414] Use of Class.forName may not work well in osgi environment

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414 --- Comment #5 from david jencks 2010-01-05 11:24:12 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24799) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24799) 2nd half of patch to use newSystemInstance for system objects 2nd half of patc

Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in StandardContext.createWrapper()

2010-01-05 Thread David Jencks
I've uploaded a couple patches to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414 with a new newSystemInstance method. I'm not sure why this doesn't need to be in a protected block like much of the code that creates objects for the app, but the original code wasn't in such a block s

Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in StandardContext.createWrapper()

2010-01-05 Thread Mark Thomas
On 05/01/2010 17:41, David Jencks wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> One thing that isn't clear to me is whether the requirement is for an >> extension point for web application related instances (ie things that in >> a J2EE environment would be bundled in the WAR) or for

svn commit: r896193 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina: connector/Connector.java mbeans/MBeanUtils.java

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 19:53:38 2010 New Revision: 896193 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896193&view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424 Based on a patch by Ivan Ensure that the ObjectNames for the Connectors are always generated using the same met

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48424] Keep same logic for creating the objectnames for connector mbeans

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in StandardContext.createWrapper()

2010-01-05 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 01/05/2010 12:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 05/01/2010 17:41, David Jencks wrote: On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: One thing that isn't clear to me is whether the requirement is for an extension point for web application related instances (ie things that in a J2EE envi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48490] New: Changing a node to stopped in uriworkermap.properties not reflected in jkstatus

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48490 Summary: Changing a node to stopped in uriworkermap.properties not reflected in jkstatus Product: Tomcat Connectors Version: 1.2.28 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux

svn commit: r896214 - in /tomcat/trunk: dist.xml extras.xml

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 20:56:14 2010 New Revision: 896214 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896214&view=rev Log: Improve JavaDoc generation Based on the proposed patch for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 Also ensure the clean targets clean up fully Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48299] Add Javadoc target to build file

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47823] Inconsistent naming of boolean getters in StandardContext

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

svn commit: r896227 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/tomcat-lite: java/org/apache/coyote/servlet/ test/org/apache/coyote/servlet/

2010-01-05 Thread costin
Author: costin Date: Tue Jan 5 21:28:13 2010 New Revision: 896227 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896227&view=rev Log: Remove the mini-servlet on top of coyote impl - can be reverted if anyone finds a use for it. Removed: tomcat/trunk/modules/tomcat-lite/java/org/apache/coyote/ser

svn commit: r896228 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/tomcat-lite/java/org/apache/tomcat/util: buf/ http/HttpRequest.java http/HttpResponse.java http/MimeMap.java http/mapper/

2010-01-05 Thread costin
Author: costin Date: Tue Jan 5 21:28:53 2010 New Revision: 896228 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896228&view=rev Log: Not used any more ( were part of the mini-servlet on top of coyote ) Removed: tomcat/trunk/modules/tomcat-lite/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/ tomcat/trunk/modu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

svn commit: r896252 - in /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config: ajp.xml http.xml

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 22:34:17 2010 New Revision: 896252 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896252&view=rev Log: Correct default Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/ajp.xml tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/ajp.xml URL

svn commit: r896253 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 22:35:06 2010 New Revision: 896253 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896253&view=rev Log: Correct default Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/vie

svn commit: r896254 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/ajp.xml

2010-01-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Jan 5 22:36:03 2010 New Revision: 896254 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896254&view=rev Log: Correct default Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/ajp.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/ajp.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48488] accepCount does not limit connections

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19

2010-01-05 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/1/5 Mladen Turk : > Hi, > > Native 1.1.19 is available for testing. > Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building against > OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me before the tag :) > > If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be > downloaded from: > > ht

Tomcat-Lite update

2010-01-05 Thread Costin Manolache
Hi, I'm still working on lite - right now my primary goal is to finish the connector, and have it usable as part of tomcat7, along with nio and apr connectors. The lite connector is based on nio ( could support apr as well ), but is intended to be directly usable by users - it supports both client

[Tomcat Wiki] Trivial Update of "PoweredBy" by Leandro de Oliveira

2010-01-05 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "PoweredBy" page has been changed by Leandro de Oliveira. The comment on this change is: includes a brazilian main webhost. http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy?action=diff&rev1=2

[Tomcat Wiki] Trivial Update of "PoweredBy" by Leandro de Oliveira

2010-01-05 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "PoweredBy" page has been changed by Leandro de Oliveira. The comment on this change is: includes a brazilian main webhost. http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy?action=diff&rev1=2

Re: [PROPOSAL] Log rotation in Tomcat Connector

2010-01-05 Thread Tim Whittington
For consistency (with Apache at least) I've gone down the road of mirroring the functionality of rotatelogs, which was fairly easy. I'm doing some long running tests (I'm seeing some weird DLL unloading/crashing behaviour in IIS 5.1 that I want to replicate and account for), but if that works

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 VickyKak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #9 from VickyKak 201

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 VickyKak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 --- Comment #10 from Kris Schneider 2010-01-05 20:06:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Could you please explain in detail why don't you think it is an issue with the > TomcatCL implementation? I thought I did that in comment 7. Here's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19

2010-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/06/2010 01:21 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/1/5 Mladen Turk: Hi, Native 1.1.19 is available for testing. Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building against OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me before the tag :) If you want to take a look, the final source distr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48489] Tomcat CL doesn't resolve the array classes.

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19

2010-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/06/2010 07:47 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 01/06/2010 01:21 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2010/1/5 Mladen Turk: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Native 1.1.19 is available for testing. >>> Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building >>> against >>> OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me b