And what about some sort of OSGI glue and Maven as build tool ?
2009/11/6 Costin Manolache :
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
>
>> I am intrigued by the idea and have similar constraints (kids+job).
>>
>> My longer term interest in lite was a simpler deployment and moving config
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157
Summary: describe how to disable X-Header trick to attack
client cert auth
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48158
Summary: warn that "per directory client certificate
authentication" is harmful
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Hauser 2009-11-07 08:09:41 UTC ---
see also Bug 48158
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Hauser 2009-11-07 08:09:50 UTC ---
see also Bug 48157 and Bug 48158
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are th
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> And what about some sort of OSGI glue
Thanks for volunteering :-).
Note that my goal is to _remove_ any framework feature from tomcat-lite -
leave just http and
services, no config file or class loading.
The current 'integration' interface se
All,
I was thinking about this on my way back from ApacheCon and we probably
need to get some advice out to users early next week.
My current understanding is that the MITM attack is triggered by a
renegotiation.
On this basis I suggest something along the following lines:
SSL using JSSE (BIO a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48158
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2009-11-07 09:10:34 GMT ---
Agreed the warning needs to go out although the docs aren't the best place for
it. Please join the discussion on the dev list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bug
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> I was thinking about this on my way back from ApacheCon and we probably
> need to get some advice out to users early next week.
>
> My current understanding is that the MITM attack is triggered by a
> renegotiation.
>
> On this basis I
"Mark Thomas" wrote in message
news:4af5a776.70...@apache.org...
> All,
>
> I was thinking about this on my way back from ApacheCon and we probably
> need to get some advice out to users early next week.
>
> My current understanding is that the MITM attack is triggered by a
> renegotiation.
>
>
Author: billbarker
Date: Sun Nov 8 01:50:41 2009
New Revision: 833800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=833800&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=83
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> I was thinking about this on my way back from ApacheCon and we probably
> need to get some advice out to users early next week.
>
> My current understanding is that the MITM attack is triggered by a
> renegotiation.
>
> On this basis I
13 matches
Mail list logo
