On 27/07/09 22:20, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/
According to the release process, the 5.5.28 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Regards
--
^TM
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
brett.prucha@scrb.navy.mil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |1.2.28
OS
Hi,
JK connector uses the request.secret attribute for setting the
AJP secret property. However APR connector and Ajp connector
use the requiredSecret instead. This of course (first problem is
that it's nowhere documented) makes problems cause it requires to
have separate directives depending on
Hi to all,
I'm working right now on the V6R1 port (very needed for our company update).
the unixd.h didn't exist under i5/OS.
In mod_jk.c I could see :
/* Yes; sorta sucks - with luck we will clean this up before httpd-2.2
* ships, leaving AP_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS def'd as 1 or 0 on all platfor
On 07/27/2009 02:20 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/
According to the release process, the 5.5.28 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Filip
-
On 07/27/2009 02:21 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The candidates source and binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.7/
According to the release process, the 1.0.7 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
no major bugs found, open bugs are ok for
Hi, anyone working on the @Filter, @Servlet annotation scanner for
tomcat-trunk ?
If I'm understanding it correctly, tomcat will have to read all files in
classes and lib and look for the
annotation - and I would guess the only reasonable option is looking at
bytecode.
I checked BCEL - seems reason
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #3 from brett.prucha@scrb.navy.mil 2009-08-04 12:34:56 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=24100)
Patch to fix deadlock when using isapi_redirect as an extension
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/user
We use xbean-finder for this in geronimo/openejb/etc.
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xbean/xbean-finder/3.5/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/trunk/xbean-finder
We also have a servlet 3.0 spec jar I've been trying to keep up to
date with the glassfish javadocs.
http
does it load all the classes?
I think byte code check might make more sense if that is the case
Filip
On 08/04/2009 01:50 PM, David Jencks wrote:
We use xbean-finder for this in geronimo/openejb/etc.
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xbean/xbean-finder/3.5/
https://svn.apache.org/repos
Thanks - so objectweb instead of BCEL.
I'll try it out - it's a bit different from what I had in mind, it looks
like xbean-finder first finds all classes and
than reads the files using the class loader ( but not Class.forName, which
is good ) and keeps track of all annotations.
I was thinking of a
On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
does it load all the classes?
IIUC no, it uses asm for byte-code inspection without loading classes.
thanks
david jencks
I think byte code check might make more sense if that is the case
Filip
On 08/04/2009 01:50 PM, David Jencks
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42996
--- Comment #30 from Filip Hanik 2009-08-04 13:34:18 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=24101)
Wireshark output for a request that went wrong
Jerome, I ran your load test. I'm not very familiar with what the app does, so
maybe you can hel
No, it scans via ASM for security reasons and only loads classes (with
no initialization) once you ask for classes that have a specific
annotation.
Sample code:
ClassFinder finder = new ClassFinder(webapp.getClassLoader(),
webappLibUrls);
for (Class servlet : finder.findAnnotatedClas
On 04/08/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 07/27/2009 02:21 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
> > The candidates source and binaries are available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.7/
> >
> > According to the release process, the 1.0.7 tag is:
> > [ ] Broken
> >
On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Thanks - so objectweb instead of BCEL.
I'll try it out - it's a bit different from what I had in mind, it
looks
like xbean-finder first finds all classes and
than reads the files using the class loader ( but not Class.forName,
which
is g
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378
tho...@gtsquare.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tho...@gtsquare.com
--
Con
Author: markt
Date: Tue Aug 4 22:49:46 2009
New Revision: 801009
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=801009&view=rev
Log:
Fix the typo Costin spotted
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/ServletRegistration.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/ServletRegistration.java
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Aug 4 22:54:25 2009
New Revision: 801011
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=801011&view=rev
Log:
Having fixed the typo, fix all the places it was referenced
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationContext.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apach
Costin Manolache wrote:
> Hi, anyone working on the @Filter, @Servlet annotation scanner for
> tomcat-trunk ?
> If I'm understanding it correctly, tomcat will have to read all files in
> classes and lib and look for the
> annotation - and I would guess the only reasonable option is looking at
> byt
The question here is :
Why did we use unixd_set_global_mutex_perms/ap_unixd_set_global_mutex_perms
since both call didn't exist in i5/OS V6R1 and I had to set
JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS to 0 to have them excluded.
I'll commit the patches for i5/OS after I some testing on the mod_jk
1.2.28 built on t
Henri Gomez wrote:
> The question here is :
>
> Why did we use unixd_set_global_mutex_perms/ap_unixd_set_global_mutex_perms
> since both call didn't exist in i5/OS V6R1 and I had to set
> JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS to 0 to have them excluded.
Because otherwise, root created file locking objects are
22 matches
Mail list logo
