https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
Summary: provide meaningful error message also to stdout if
server.xml is not readable
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
S
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44017
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 02:21:16 PST ---
see also bug 47495
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 02:30:33 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23940)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23940)
tc_bug_47495_patch.txt
some basic ideas to make the problem easier solvable
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 8 12:49:12 2009
New Revision: 792120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792120&view=rev
Log:
Document a missing option
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 8 12:50:03 2009
New Revision: 792122
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792122&view=rev
Log:
Document a missing option
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml
URL:
http:
I think we got everything worked out, thanks Sebb for pointing out some
of the stuff and being persistent.
anything you can think of that would not make the release pass before I tag?
thanks
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:07:42 2009
New Revision: 792205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792205&view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt?rev
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:31:20 2009
New Revision: 792216
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792216&view=rev
Log:
Add a manifest template for an osgi bundle
Added:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/resources/
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/resources/MANIFEST.MF (with props)
Ad
Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag
on Monday.
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag
> on Monday.
+1.
Note there is a POOL 1.5.2 release with a couple more fixes in it
happening now and it would be good to get that into 5.5.28 if possible.
Mark
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Casey Lucas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clu...@e-miles.com
--
Configure
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag
on Monday.
+1
I was hoping to backport the windows packaging, but it's
not that straightforward, so can wait for a next release.
Regards
--
^(TM)
On 07/08/2009 12:38 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a
tag on Monday.
+1
I was hoping to backport the windows packaging, but it's
not that straightforward, so can wait for a next release.
no worries, we d
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from Fil
On 08.07.2009 18:32, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag
> on Monday.
I second Mark's and Mladen's remarks, but I think we all agree that
there were lots of changes to 5.5 and a release is somehow overdue. So
we should try to not
On 07/08/2009 01:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 08.07.2009 18:32, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag
on Monday.
I second Mark's and Mladen's remarks, but I think we all agree that
there were lots of changes to 5.5 and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sulak 2009-07-08 13:56:55 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=23945)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23945)
Zipped configuration files
Here are requested configuration files from to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Martin Sulak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Martin
On 08.07.2009 22:53, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 07/08/2009 01:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 08.07.2009 18:32, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>
>>> Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag
>>> on Monday.
...
>> Filip: how tight is your time budget. Can
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from Fil
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Jul 8 22:34:40 2009
New Revision: 792340
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792340&view=rev
Log:
remove dependency on the modeler so that the pool can run outside of tomcat and
still have jmx query notifications.
Added:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
Summary: provide better insight on BindException: Cannot assign
requested address
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 22:06:49 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23946)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23946)
tomcat_rfe_47499patch.txt
an idea how to improve the error reported
--
Co
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Martin Sulak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Martin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 23:30:52 PST ---
reported also to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536328.
Some discussion that may end in fingerpointing between debian and tomcat is
here
http://marc.info/?
25 matches
Mail list logo