DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47495] New: provide meaningful error message also to stdout if server.xml is not readable

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 Summary: provide meaningful error message also to stdout if server.xml is not readable Product: Tomcat 6 Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux S

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44017] if an inesting host is mentioned in server.xml, warn!

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44017 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 02:21:16 PST --- see also bug 47495 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47495] provide meaningful error message also to stdout if server.xml is not readable

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 02:30:33 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23940) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23940) tc_bug_47495_patch.txt some basic ideas to make the problem easier solvable

svn commit: r792120 - /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml

2009-07-08 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Jul 8 12:49:12 2009 New Revision: 792120 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792120&view=rev Log: Document a missing option Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org

svn commit: r792122 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml

2009-07-08 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Jul 8 12:50:03 2009 New Revision: 792122 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792122&view=rev Log: Document a missing option Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/listeners.xml URL: http:

jdbc pool - shoot for another release

2009-07-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I think we got everything worked out, thanks Sebb for pointing out some of the stuff and being persistent. anything you can think of that would not make the release pass before I tag? thanks Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev

svn commit: r792205 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2009-07-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Jul 8 16:07:42 2009 New Revision: 792205 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792205&view=rev Log: votes Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt?rev

svn commit: r792216 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/resources: ./ MANIFEST.MF

2009-07-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Jul 8 16:31:20 2009 New Revision: 792216 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792216&view=rev Log: Add a manifest template for an osgi bundle Added: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/resources/ tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/resources/MANIFEST.MF (with props) Ad

5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag on Monday. Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag > on Monday. +1. Note there is a POOL 1.5.2 release with a couple more fixes in it happening now and it would be good to get that into 5.5.28 if possible. Mark

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47292] Attributes are lost in newly created DeltaSession

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 Casey Lucas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clu...@e-miles.com -- Configure

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag on Monday. +1 I was hoping to backport the windows packaging, but it's not that straightforward, so can wait for a next release. Regards -- ^(TM)

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 07/08/2009 12:38 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag on Monday. +1 I was hoping to backport the windows packaging, but it's not that straightforward, so can wait for a next release. no worries, we d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47292] Attributes are lost in newly created DeltaSession

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 Filip Hanik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #4 from Fil

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.07.2009 18:32, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag > on Monday. I second Mark's and Mladen's remarks, but I think we all agree that there were lots of changes to 5.5 and a release is somehow overdue. So we should try to not

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 07/08/2009 01:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 08.07.2009 18:32, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag on Monday. I second Mark's and Mladen's remarks, but I think we all agree that there were lots of changes to 5.5 and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47292] Attributes are lost in newly created DeltaSession

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sulak 2009-07-08 13:56:55 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23945) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23945) Zipped configuration files Here are requested configuration files from to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47292] Attributes are lost in newly created DeltaSession

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 Martin Sulak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #6 from Martin

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

2009-07-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.07.2009 22:53, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > On 07/08/2009 01:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> On 08.07.2009 18:32, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> >>> Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag >>> on Monday. ... >> Filip: how tight is your time budget. Can

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47292] Attributes are lost in newly created DeltaSession

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 Filip Hanik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #7 from Fil

svn commit: r792340 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool: ./ doc/ java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/ java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/interceptor/ resources/ test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/

2009-07-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Jul 8 22:34:40 2009 New Revision: 792340 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=792340&view=rev Log: remove dependency on the modeler so that the pool can run outside of tomcat and still have jmx query notifications. Added: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47499] New: provide better insight on BindException: Cannot assign requested address

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499 Summary: provide better insight on BindException: Cannot assign requested address Product: Tomcat 6 Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47499] provide better insight on BindException: Cannot assign requested address

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 22:06:49 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23946) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23946) tomcat_rfe_47499patch.txt an idea how to improve the error reported -- Co

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47292] Attributes are lost in newly created DeltaSession

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 Martin Sulak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #8 from Martin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47499] provide better insight on BindException: Cannot assign requested address

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Hauser 2009-07-08 23:30:52 PST --- reported also to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536328. Some discussion that may end in fingerpointing between debian and tomcat is here http://marc.info/?